Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.247253
References
Brennan, N. M., C. Daly, & C. Harrington
(2010) Rhetoric, Argument and Impression Management in Hostile Takeover Defence Documents. British Accounting Review 42(4), 253–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
(Ed.) (2009) Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & B. J. Garssen
(Eds.) (2012) Exploring argumentative contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2015) Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. New York/Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & R. Grootendorst
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, S.
(2016) Book review of “Eemeren, F. H. van & B. J. Garssen (Eds.) (2015), op. cit.”. Argumentation 311, 213–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, S. E.
(2004) A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muller-Mirza & A. N. Perret-Clermont
(Eds.) (2009) Argumentation and Education. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, E. & S. Greco Morasso
(2010) Comparing the Argumentum-Model of Topics with other contemporary approaches to argument schemes; the procedural and the material components. Argumentation 24(4), 489–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar