Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in ContextVol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.271–275
Book review
Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority
Reviewed by
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References
Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R.
(2002) Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Genetic Counseling 111, 399–418. 
Eemeren, F. H. van
(2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P.
(2002a) Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 131–159.
(2002b) Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Advances in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. Newport New: Vale Press, pp. 13–28.
Green, N. L.
(2012) Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1(1), 113–129.
Green, N., Dwight, R., Navoraphan, K., & Stadler, B.
(2011) Natural language generation of transparent arguments for lay audiences. Argument and Computation 21, 23–50.
Green, N. & Stadler, B.
(2013) Adding coping-related strategies to biomedical argumentation in computer-generated genetic counseling patient letters. Patient Education and Counseling 92(2), 149–152.