Cover not available
Article published In:
Vagueness and Elasticity of 'Sort of' in TV Discussion Discourse in the Asian Pacific
Edited by Vahid Parvaresh and Grace Zhang
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1] 2019
► pp. 111–132

‘Sort of’ in Indonesian television discourse

| University of Riau, Indonesia

Expressing vagueness is a common phenomenon especially in spoken discourse. The present paper examines vague language ‘sort of’ (e.g., kayak gitu) realised in spoken discourse in Indonesian. It accounts for the pragmatic functions of ‘sort of’ examined in their discourse context. The data under investigation include a 24-hour corpus of a television talk-show discussing various social issues. A pragmatic qualitative data analysis is predominantly employed directed towards a functional analysis of the use of ‘sort of’. Descriptive statistics accompany the qualitative analysis to reinforce the investigation. The quantitative analysis shows that ‘sort of’ was infrequently used in the context of Indonesian television discourse. The corpus displays various forms of lexical devices for ‘sort of’ in Indonesian. The pragmatic analysis shows that ‘sort of’ was employed as a politeness strategy to tone down strong linguistic expressions and to save the speaker’s positive face. The infrequent use of ‘sort of’ in the discourse type under investigation in this study reinforces the notion that ‘sort of’ is a feature of informal interaction.

Keywords: hedges, vagueness, politeness, discourse, Indonesian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.‘Sort of’ in Indonesian
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Distribution
    • 5.2Functions
  • 6.Discussion
    • Function of ‘sort of’ for mitigating face threats
    • Infrequent use of ‘sort of’ in Indonesian
  • 7.Conclusions and implications
  • Notation guide
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00023.pur
References
Aijmer, K.
(1984) ‘Sort of’ and ‘kind of’ in English conversation. Studia Linguistica, 38(2), 118–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alkhatnai, M.
(2017) Vague language and its social role. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(2), 122–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G.
(2000) Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic approach to the language of adolescents (Vol. 841). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Beeching, K.
(2016) Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Channell, J.
(1994) Vague language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crompton, P.
(1997) Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D., & Davy, D.
(1975) Advanced conversational English. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A.
(2010) Hedges in context: Form and function of ‘sort of’ and ‘kind of’. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds), New approaches to hedging (pp. 49–71). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
(2010) Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15–34). Bingley: UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, L., & Carter, R.
(2007) Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. M.
(1998) The function of discourse particles: a study with special reference to spoken standard French (Vol. 531). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1985) Sexdifferences and miscommunication: Some data from New Zealand. In J. B. Pride (Ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: communication and miscommunication (pp. 24–43). Melbourne, Australia: River Seine.Google Scholar
(1986) Functions of ‘you know’ in women’s and men’s speech. Language in Society 151, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) ‘Sort of’ in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech. Studia Linguistica, 42(2), 85–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 20(2), 91–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Indonesia, T. R. K. B.
(2008) Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., Smith, S. W., & Lüdge, T.
(2003) Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737–1769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P.
(1984) The kind of/sort of construction. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 101, pp. 157–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khalil, H. H.
(2017) A pragmatic analysis of vague language in the news articles on the Iraqi Security Crisis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(5), 327–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1975) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In D. J. Hockney, W. L. Harper, & B. Freed (Eds.), Contemporary research in philosophical logic and linguistic Semantics (pp. 221–271). Dodrecht: Fortis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. Y.
(2010) ‘… that’s actually ‘sort of’ you know trying to get consultants in. ’: Functions and multifunctionality of modifiers in academic lectures. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 1173–1183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y. L.
(2013) Vague language and interpersonal communication: An analysis of adolescent intercultural conversation. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 1(2), 69–81.Google Scholar
Miskovic-Lukovic, M.
(2009) Is there a chance that I might kinda sort of take you to dinner?: The role of the pragmatic particles kind of and sort of in utterance interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 602–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T.
(1997) Interlanguage view on hedging. In R. Markkanen, & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic text (pp. 188–207). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, J. B., & Collins, K. M. T.
(2009) Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 114–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, W.
(2012) An analysis of vagueness in English news from Grice’s cooperative principles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12), 25–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, V.
(2018) ‘We are going to do a lot of things for college tuition’: Vague language in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates. Corpus Pragmatics, 21, 167–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Ahmadian, M. J.
(2016) The impact of task structure on the use of vague expressions by ELF leaners. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 436–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Tayebi, T.
(2014) Vaguely speaking in Persian. Discourse Processes, 51(7), 565–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C.
(1982) On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (Vol. 81) (pp. 83–97). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ruzaitė, J.
(2007) Vague language in educational settings: Quantifiers and approximators in British and American English. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schourup, L. C.
(1985) Common discourse particles in English conversation: like, well, y’know. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Sneddon, J. N.
(2006) Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian (Vol. 5811). Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(1986) A matter of prolonged fieldwork: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T.
(1994) Vagueness. In R. E. Asher, & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 4869–4871). Oxford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Wouk, F.
(1999) Gender and the use of pragmatic particles in Indonesian. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(2), 194–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Solidarity in Indonesian conversation: The discourse marker ya . Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 171–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A., & Bloomer, A.
(2006) Projects in linguistics: A practical guide to researching language. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Zhang, G.
(2011) Elasticity of vague language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(4), 571–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) The impact of touchy topics on vague language use. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 231, 87–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The elasticity of I think: Stretching its pragmatic functions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(2), 225–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G. Q., & Sabet, P. G.
(2014) Elastic ‘I think’: Stretching over L1 and L2. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 334–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q.
(1998) Fuzziness-vagueness-generality-ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(1), 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar