Article published In:
Identity and Communication in Asian Contexts
Edited by Asmah Haji Omar and Michael Dimitrios Hadzantonis
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 32:1] 2022
► pp. 108132
References
Abondolo, D.
(1998) The Uralic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.
(2006) Grammars in a cross-linguistic perspective. In A. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon. (Eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, G.
(2004) The languages of Central Siberia: Introduction and overview. In E. Vajda. (Ed.), Languages and prehistory of Central Siberia (pp. 1–123). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. and Harrison, D.
(1999) Tyvan. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
(1996) The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butanaev, V.
(2004) Linguistic reflections of Xakas ethnohistory. In E. Vajda. (Ed.), Languages and prehistory of Central Siberia (pp. 215–233). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, S.
(2003) Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cysouw, M.
(2005) Morphology in the wrong place. A survey of preposed enclitics. In W. Dressler. (Ed.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp. 17–37). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dul’zon, A. P.
(1968) Ketskij jazyk [Ket]. Tomsk: Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Evans, N.
(2006) Who said polysynthetic languages avoid subordination? Multiple subordination strategies in Dalabon. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 26 (1), 31–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. and Sasse, H. -J.
(2002) Introduction: problems of polysynthesis. In N. Evans and H. -J. Sasse. (Eds.), Problems of polysynthesis, (pp. 1–14). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filchenko, A. Yu
(2010) Aspects of the grammar of Eastern Khanty. Tomsk: Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogičeskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Hajdú, P.
(1968) Chrestomathia Samoiedica. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Heath, J.
(1975) Functional relationships in grammar. Language 51 (1), 89–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, L. and Csató, É. A.
(Eds.) (1998) The Turkic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karpov, V. G.
(1966) Xakasskij jazyk [Xakas]. In N. A. Baskakov. (Ed.), Jazyki narodov SSSR, vol. 2, Tjurkskie jazyki (pp. 428–445). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Koškareva, N.
(2007) Sredstva vyraženija aktual’nogo členenija v surgutskom dialekte khantyjskogo jazyka (v sopostavlenii s drugimi ural’skimi jazykami i dialektami khantyjskogo jazyka) [Means of expressing the functional sentence perspective in the Surgut dialect of the Khanty language (in comparison with other Uralic languages and dialects of the Khanty language)]. Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Istorja, filologija, T. 6, vyp. 2: Filologija, 34–43.Google Scholar
Kotorova, E. and Nefedov, A.
(2006) Tipologičeskie xarakteristiki ketskogo jazyka: veršinnoe ili zavisimostnoe markirovanie? [Ket typological features: head-marking or dependent marking?]. Voprosy jazykoznaniya, 51, 43–56.Google Scholar
Krjukova, E.
(2012) Kommunikativnaja organizatsija predloženija v ketskom jazyke: Sravnitel’nyj aspekt (na materiale ketskikh fol’klornykh i bytovykh tekstov XX i XXI vekov) [Communicative sentence structure in Ket: Comparative aspect (Ket folklore texts of 20th and 21st centuries)]. TSPU Bulletin, 1 (116), 56–59.Google Scholar
Künnap, A.
(1999) Enets. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A.
(1999) Sel’kupskij jazyk s točki zrenija tipologii porjadka slov [Selkup from the point of view of word order typology]. In E. Rakhilina and Ja. Testelets. (Eds.). Tipologija i teorija jazyka: Ot opisanija k ob"jasneniju (pp. 88–98). Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
(1984) How to avoid subordination. In Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 493–523). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Is basic order universal? In D. Payne. (Ed.). The Pragmatics of word-order flexibility. Typological studies in language 22 1 (pp. 15–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, I.
(1997) Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nefedov, A.
(2015) Clause linkage in Ket. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
(2018) Otritsanije neglagol’nykh predikatov v ketskom jazyke [Negation of nonverbal predicates in Ket]. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 11, 20–40. Tomsk: Izdatelstvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogičeskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Nefedov, A. and Vajda, E.
(2015) Grammatical sketch. In E. Kotorova and A. Nefedov. (Eds.), Comprehensive Dictionary of Ket with Russian, German and English translations (pp. 27–69). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.
(1992) Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I.
(2014) A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pakendorf, B.
(2012) Patterns of relativization in North Asia: towards a refined typology of prenominal participial relative clauses. In V. Gast and H. Diessel. (Eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective. Data-driven approaches to cross-clausal syntax (pp. 253–283). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prokofjeva, E.
(1966) Sel’kupskij jazyk [Selkup]. In V. Lytkin and K. Majtinskaja. (Eds.), Jazyki narodov SSSR, vol. 3, Finno-ugorskie i samodijskie jazyki (pp. 396–415). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Ross, M.
(2001) Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in North-west Melanesia. In A. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon. (Eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics (pp. 134–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact, vol. THEMA, no. 11, 116–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudnitskaya, E.
(2017) Aktual’noje členenije i porjadok slov v ustnom evenkijskom jazyke: na materiale ustnykh rasskazov na evenkijskom jazyke 2005–2011 gg. [The functional sentence perspective and word order in oral Evenki: based on oral Evenki narratives of 2005–2011]. Palmarium Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Sinor, D.
(Ed.) (1988) The Uralic languages. Description, history and foreign influences. Leiden: E.J. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, A.
(2013) Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tadmor, U.
(2009) Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In M. Haspelmath and U. Tadmor. (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages (pp. 55–75). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tereschenko, N.
(1966) Nenetskij jazyk [Nenets]. In V. Lytkin and K. Majtinskaja. (Eds.), Jazyki narodov SSSR, vol. 3, Finno-ugorskie i samodijskie jazyki (pp. 376–395). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tikhomirov, A.
(2018) Paleoaziatskie i samodijskie narody. Jazyki, migratsii, obyčai [Paleoasiatic and Samoyedic peoples. Languages, migrations, customs]. Ridero.Google Scholar
Ubrjatova, E. I. and Litvin, F. A.
(Eds.) (1986) Strukturnye tipy sintetičeskix polipredikativnyx konstrukcij v jazykax raznyx system [Structural types of the polipredicative constructions with synthetic verbal form in the languages of different typology]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Vajda, E.
(2001) Yeniseian peoples and languages. A history of Yeniseian studies with an annotated bibliography and a source guide. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
(2008) The Siberian origin of the Na-Dene languages. Lecture presented at Dene-Yeniseic Symposium, February 26–29, Fairbanks and Anchorage, Alaska.Google Scholar
(2009) Loanwords in Ket. In M. Haspelmath and U. Tadmor. (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages (pp. 471–495). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Typological accommodation in Central Siberia. In T. Güldemann, P. McConvell, and R. Rhodes. (Eds.), The language of hunter-gatherers (pp. 465–498). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vall, M. and Kanakin, I.
(1985) Kategorija imeni v ketskom jazyke [The nominal category in Ket]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Vorobíjova, V., Novitskaja, I., Girfanova, K., and Vesnin, V.
(2017) Adnominal possessive constructions in Narym, Vasjugan and Middle-Ob dialects of Selkup. Linguistica Uralica LIII, 54–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, H.
(1996) Vergleichende Akzentologie der Jenissej-Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (=Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 46).Google Scholar
(1997a) Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (=Tunguso-Sibirica; Bd. 3.).Google Scholar
(1997b) Abriß der kottischen Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (=Tunguso-Sibirica; Bd. 4.).Google Scholar
(1997c) Das Jugische (Sym-Ketische). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (=Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 50).Google Scholar
(1998) Probleme der Wortbildung in den Jenissej-Sprachen. München: Lincom Europa (=Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics 25).Google Scholar
(2005) Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (=Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 67).Google Scholar
Wu, T.
(2011) The syntax of prenominal relative clauses: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 15 1, 569–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar