Article published in:Academic Interaction
Edited by Helen Marriott
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 14:1] 2004
► pp. 179–195
Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints
English and Persian
This paper discusses a number of differences between English and Persian in the area of speech acts and links them with different cultural values and norms. The Persian speakers’ use of face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints was compared with American English speakers’ performance. The most frequent face- saving strategy used by both groups in reaction to complaints was the apology speech act. Therefore, a cross-cultural comparison in the realization patterns of the apology speech acts between the two languages was performed. A detailed analysis of the use of the illocutionary force indicating device (IFID) strategies and supportive strategies revealed important differences in communicative styles of the two groups which can give us insights into understanding different cultural values, norms, and assumptions concerning interpersonal use of language in a Western and a non-Western language. It is shown that Persian speakers are more sensitive to contextual factors and vary their face-keeping strategies accordingly whereas English speakers mostly use one apology strategy and intensify it based on contextual factors.
Published online: 08 March 2004
Cited by 10 other publications
Al-Shorman, Ra'ed Abdulgader
Bagherinejad, Issa & Mohammad Reza Jadidoleslam
CEBİ, Ahmet & Mehmet Veysi BABAYİĞİT
Eslami, Zohreh R.
Moghaddam, Massoume Khodaei, Mahmoud Elyasi & Shahla Sharifi
Nakhle, Mahboube, Mohammad Naghavi & Abdullah Razavi
Sharifian, Farzad & Maryam Jamarani
Tavakoli Gheinani, Majid
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.