Article published in:
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 24:1 (2014) ► pp. 4159
References

References

Auerbach, E.
(1993) Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 27(1), 9–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bae, J.
(2007) Development of English skills need not suffer as a result of immersion: Grades 1 and 2 writing assessment in a Korean/English two-way immersion program. Language Learning , 57(2), 299–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonabente, C.L.
(2007) Teachers’ English proficiency poor. Inquirer . Retrived March 8 2009, from http://​opinion​.inquirer​.net​/inquireropinion​/talkofthetown​/view​_article​.php​?article​_id​=70483
Chan, S.H., & Tan, H.
(2006) English for mathematics and science: Current Malaysian language-in-education policies and practices. Language and Education , 20(4), 306–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chow, P., & Cummins, J.
(2003) Valuing multilingual and multicultural approaches to learning. In S.R. Schecter & J. Cummins (Eds.), Multilingual education in practice (pp. 32–61). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Council for Cultural Co-operation, Education Committee, Modern Languages Division, Strasbourg
(2001)  Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.
(1998) Immersion education for the millennium: What have we learned from 30 years of research on second language immersion? In M.R. Childs & R.M. Bostwick (Eds.), Learning through two languages: Research and practice. Second Katoh Gakuen International Symposium on Immersion and Bilingual Education (pp. 34–47). Katoh Gakuen, Japan.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2007) Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp. 139–157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Davison, C., & Williams, A.
(2001) Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 51–70). Harlow, Essex: Longman & Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Dupuy, B.C.
(2000) Content-based instruction: Can it help ease the transition from beginning to advanced foreign language classes? Foreign Language Annals , 33(2), 205–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Idris, N., Cheong, L.S., Mohd. Nor, N., Abdul Razak, A.Z., & Md. Saad, R.
(2007) The professional preparation of Malaysian teachers in the implementation of teaching and learning of mathematics and science in English. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education , 3(2), 101–110.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.
(2000) Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKay, S.L.
(1998) Teaching English in multilingual settings. Retrieved March 8 2009, from http://​www​.und​.ac​.za​/und​/ling​/archive​/mcka​-01​.html
Mohamad Nor, F., Abd Aziz, M., & Jusof, K.
(2011) Should English for teaching mathematics and science (ETeMS) in Malaysia be abolished? World Applied Sciences Journal , 12(Special Issue on Creating a Knowledge Based Society), 36–40.Google Scholar
Nikula, T.
(2007) Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes , 26(2), 206–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osman, K., Halim, L., & Mohd Meerah, S.
(2006) What Malaysian science teachers need to improve their science instruction: A comparison across gender, school location and area of specialization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education , 2(2), 58–81.Google Scholar
Pandian, A., & Ramiah, R.
(2003) Mathematics and Science in English – Teacher Voices. Proceedings of the ELTC ETeMS Conference 2003: Managing Curricular Change .
Pica, T.
(2002) The subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic ne Eds of classroom language learners. The Modern Language Journal , 86(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, D.M.
(2006) Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based instruction. The Modern Language Journal , 90(3), 373–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, F.L.
(2004) Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 24, 261–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. Crossref
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1986) Two ingredients to the successful use of a second language as a medium of instruction in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal , 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Johnson, R.K.
(1997) Immersion education: A category within bilingual education. In R.K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 1–6). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(2005) The evolving sociopolitical context of immersion education in Canada: some implications for program development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 15(2), 169–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upton, T.A., & Lee-Thompson, L.
(2001) The role of the first language in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 23, 469–495.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.
(1986)  Thought and language . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walker, C.L., & Tedick, D.J.
(2000) The complexity of immersion education: Teachers address the issues. The Modern Language Journal , 84(1), 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar