Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 24:1 (2014) ► pp.60–80

Negotiation of power and solidarity in email

The case of students learning Japanese as a foreign language and their facilitators

| Asia Institute, University of Melbourne
| ‘School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales
| Faculty of Education and Culture, Miyazaki University

The issue of e-politeness has been attracting increasing attention in the field of foreign language teaching and learning. This article examines how students of Japanese as a foreign language in Australia negotiated power and solidarity in their email correspondence with ‘facilitators’ in Japan who provided support in essay writing tasks. Their relationships, which were neither completely status-unequal nor status-equal, offer a unique social context for an examination of politeness. The study examines whether and how power and solidarity shifted over the 12 weeks of email exchanges. The results show varying levels of rapport and orientations to politeness developing over time, as well as evidence of students applying implicit input from the facilitators’ email messages. The article also considers the impacts, on the politeness phenomena in the data, of students’ cultural backgrounds and prior exposure to casual Japanese. The findings are discussed in relation to the question of ‘appropriateness’ in fostering foreign language learner ability to negotiate power and solidarity in intercultural communication.

Keywords: Email, power, Japanese as a foreign language, solidarity
Published online: 18 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.24.1.04nak
References
Barke, A.J
(2001) Inconspicuous gender marking: The case of Japanese sentence-final particles, yo and ne . In K. Horie & S. Sato (Eds.), Congnitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context (pp. 235–255). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Biesenbach-Lucas, S
(2007) Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology , 11(2), 59–81.Google Scholar
Bloch, J
(2002) Student/teacher interaction via email: The social context of Internet discourse. Journal of Second Language Writing , 11(2), 117–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bretag, T
(2006) Developing ‘Third space’ interculturality using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 111, 981–1011. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C
(1987)  Politeness: Some universals in language usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, T
(2005) Beyond keigo: Smooth communication and the expression of respect in Japanese as a foreign language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 175/176 , 233–247.Google Scholar
Chen, C.F.E
(2006) The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning and Technology , 10(2), 35–55.Google Scholar
Cook, H.M
(1992) Meanings of non-referential indexes: A case study of the Japanese sentence-final particle ne . Text , 12(4), 507–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: Academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua , 251, 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008)  Socializing identities through speech style: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign language . Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D
(2001)  Language and the internet (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duthler, K.W
(2006) The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 11(2), Retrieved August 10 2008, from [URL] DOI: DOI logo
Ervin-Tripp, S
(1968) Sociolinguistics. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 91–165). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W
(1997)  Anthropological linguistics . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hamamoto, H
(2001)  Tabunka Sekai no Imiron [Semantics in the Multicultural World]. Tokyo: Shohakusha.Google Scholar
Herring, S
(2002) Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology , 361, 109–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartford, B., & Bardovi-Harig, K
(1996) “At your earliest convenience”: A study of written student requests to faculty. In Lawrence F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning: Monograph series volume 71 (pp. 55–69). Urbana, IL: DEIL.Google Scholar
Heinrich, P
(2005) Language ideology in JFL textbooks. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 175/176 , 213–232.Google Scholar
Hori, M
(2000) Language change in Japanese society. In M. Hori (Ed.), The positive politeness trend in recent Japanese . Tokyo: JACET.Google Scholar
Kasai, J., Shinozaki, Y., & Nihei, T
(2008)  Gaikokujin no tame no Keetai Meeru@Nippon (>▽<) [Mobile Phone Emails@Nippon for Foreigners]. Tokyo: Ask Publishing.Google Scholar
Ma, R
(1996) Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In H. Susan (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 173–185). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marriott, H
(1995) The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In B.F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad context (pp. 197–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, P.K
(2002) Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community. Computers and Composition , 19(1), 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y
(2004) Alternative femininity: Personae of middle-aged mothers. In S. Okamoto, & J. Shibamoto Smith (Eds.), Japanese language, gender, and ideology: Cultural models and real people (pp. 240–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, S.K
(1989)  Japanese conversation: Self-contextualization through structure and interactional management . Norwood: NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mills, S
(2003)  Gender and politeness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morand, D.A., & Ocker, R.J
(2002)  Politeness theory and computer-mediated communications: A sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages . Paper presented at the 36th Hawaii International conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36).
Nishimura, Y
(2003) Linguistic innovations and interactional features of casual online communiation in Japanese. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 9(1). Retrieved April 4 2008, from [URL]
(2008) Japanese BBS websites as online communities: (Im)politeness perspectives. Language@Internet , 51. Retrieved April 4 2008, from [URL]
Niyekawa, A.M
(1991)  Minimum essential politeness: A guide to Japanese Honorific language . Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
Ohashi, J
(2009) Natural conversation reconstruction tasks: The language classroom as a meeting place. PORTAL Journal of Multidisiplinary International Studies , 6(1). [URL] accessed January 2012 DOI logo
Okamoto, S
(1997) Social context, linguistic ideology, and indexical expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics , 28(6), 795–817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegal, M
(1995) Individual differences and study abroad: Women learning Japanese in Japan. In B.F. Freed (Ed.) (1995)  Second language acquisition in study abroad context (pp. 225–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S
(1991)  Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization . Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, A
(2006) Denshi meeru ni yoru ikenkoukan o doonyuushita gaikokugokyooiku jissen: Nihongo gakushuusha no meerubun no henka to soogoszyoukatei no bunseki. [Foreign language education incorporating discussion on email: An analysis of changes in emails and interaction processes] Nihon Kyooikukoogakkai Ronbunshi , 30(2), 79–92.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.K
(2010) Who is to say ‘Your Japanese is incorrect’?: Reflection on ‘correct’ Japanese usages by learners of Japanese. Japanese Studies , 30(3), 427–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinagre, M
(2006) Social interaction in asynchronous learning environments. Anglogermanica Online , 20061, 13–26.Google Scholar
Watts, R.J
(2003)  Politeness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodin, J
(1997) Email tandem learning and the commnicative curriculum. ReCALL , 91, 22–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yana, A, Ooki, R., & Komatsu, Y
(2005)  Nihongo E-meeru no Kakikata . [How to Write Email in Japanese] Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Keiko Todo & Tingting Xiao
2023. Revisiting the binary view of honorifics in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.