Cover not available
Article published In:
Explored but not Assumed: Revisiting Commonalities in Asian Pacific Communication
Edited by Hui-Ching Chang and Ling Chen
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 25:1] 2015
► pp. 97–116

Proverb commonalities in different languages and its application to Asian Pacific communication

| Zaporizhzhya National University,
This article surveys the idea of commonalities in cross-cultural communication through examining potential semantic universals in languages, particularly in their proverbs — the smallest verbal folklore genre that vividly reflects the mentality and culture of any nation. At the proverb level, it is possible to identify, (1) basic cognitive universal mechanisms that lead to the creativity of metaphorical thinking; (2) principles of verbalization of common human values in different languages; and (3) statements of affability, translatability, and as a result, mutual understanding between nations. At the global level, diverse human languages and cultures exist and are interconnected in a dialectical unity reflecting both its universal/common and specific features. Based on the idea of Noosphere, i.e., the latent planetary source of any kind of intellectual and spiritual information, this metaphysical perspective enables us to identify human universality in all its forms.
Keywords: proverbs, Noosphere, cultural commonalities, linguistic universals
Published online: 15 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.25.1.06man
References (44)
Bach, E. (2010). Semantic universals. SOAS working papers in linguistics. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Bach, E., & Chao, W. (2009). Semantic universals and typology. In C. Collins, M. Christiansen, & S. Edelman (Eds.), Language universals (pp. 152–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Benthem, J. (1991). Linguistic universals in logical semantics. In D. Zaefferer (Ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics (pp. 17–36). Berlin, Germany: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Bloom, P., & Keil, F.C. (2001). Thinking through language. Mind and Language, 16(4), 351–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, D.E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. (1995). The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-c. (2011). Clever, creative, modest: The Chinese language practice. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1996). Cartesian linguistics: A Chapter in the history of rationalistic thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Eifring, H.B., & Theil, R. (2004). Linguistics for students of Asian and African languages. Institutt for østeuropeiske og orientalske studier.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 321, 429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fintel, K., & Matthewson, L. (2008). Universals in semantics. The Linguistic Review, 251, 139–201.Google Scholar
Gowan, J.A. (2014). Extending Einstein’s equivalence principle: Symmetry conservation. Available at [URL]
Greenberg, J.H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R., & Taylor, T.J. (1989). Landmarks in linguistics thought: The Western tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honeck, R.P., & Temple, J.G. (1994). Proverbs: The extended conceptual base and great chain metaphor theories. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(2), 85–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R.A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232–239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, J.J. (1976). A hypothesis about the uniqueness of natural language. In S.R. Harnad, H.D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 280: Origins and evolution of language and speech (pp. 33–41). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, H. (2010). List of human values: Core values assessment. Retrieved from [URL]
Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83(3), 265–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. (2013). A comparative study of English and Chinese animal proverbs: From the perspective of metaphors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(10), 1844–1849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manakin, V. (2004), Sopostavitelnaya lexikologiya (Contrastive lexicology). Kiev, Ukraine: Znanie Publishing House.Google Scholar
. (2011). Language and the general symmetry of the universe. Movoznavstvo [linguistics], 31, 26–40. (Theoretical Journal of Potebnya Institute of Linguistics, Ukrainian National Academy of Science).Google Scholar
. (2012). Mova i mizhkulturna komunikacia (Language and cross-cultural communication). Kyiv, Ukraine: Academia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Marinov, S. (2011). Generative ideas in Port Royal grammar. Retrieved from [URL]
Mieder, W. (1989). American proverbs: A study of texts and contexts. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Moreno, A.I. (2005). Ananalysis of the cognitive dimension of proverbs in English and Spanish: The conceptual power of language reflecting popular believes. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2(1), 42–54.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R.H. (1997). A short history of linguistics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. In D.G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Culture, language and personality: Selected essays. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. (2006). The turns of translation studies: new paradigms or shifting viewpoints? Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2006). The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In B. Hamp (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 199–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2008). Universals of semantics. In P.C. Hogan (Ed.), Cambridge Encyclopedia of the language sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vernadsky, V.I. (1989). Biosphere and Noosphere. Moscow: Science Publishing House.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1987). Psihologia iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo/Art.Google Scholar
Whorf B.L. (1940). Science and linguistics. Technology Review, 351, 229–31, 247–8.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaefferer, D. (Ed.) (1991). Semantic universals and universal semantics. Berlin, Germany: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, W. (2013). A comparative study of the deep structure of culture reflected in English and Chinese social proverbs. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 392–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tamimy, Mohammad & Rahman Sahragard
2021. Americans’ cultural attitudes to group work: Insights from the proverbs. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT 9:3 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.