Much research has been done addressing the issue of language and dialect and has attracted much interest in the Sinophone world. In this paper, the issue is approached from the perspective of Speech Community Theory (SCT) with discussion of the identification of Chinese varieties. There are mainly two approaches in previous research: linguistic and sociolinguistic. In the linguistic approach, the classification of languages and dialects is through comparison of linguistic descriptions and intelligibility. In the sociolinguistic approach, actual language use and attitudes of the speakers are investigated and ethnic and political factors are considered. The two approaches tend to result in different classifications. The purely linguistic classification tends to be narrower than the classification invoking attitudinal, cultural and political factors, resulting in a larger number of languages than the sociolinguistic approach. The different approaches are traced to divergent understandings of what a language is. A language is often understood purely as a tool of communication or, alternatively, it is regarded primarily as an identity device. Applying SCT, we analyze the connection between communication and identity formation, taking the example of Cantonese speakers. That case shows a correlation of linguistic contact with linguistic identity among native speakers. Consequently, the relevance of cultural and socio-political factors is explained through their impact on communication rather than directly on a linguistic identity.
(1997) The information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. II: The power of identity. New York: Blackwell.
Chao, Y.R
(1943) Languages and dialects in China. In Anwar S. Dil (Ed.), Aspects of Chinese sociolinguistics, 1976, (pp. 21–25). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Chao, Y.R
(1976) My linguistic autobiography. In Anwar S. Dil (Ed.), Aspects of Chinese sociolinguistics (pp. 1–20). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cook, Edwin A
(1966) Narak: Language or dialect?Journal of the Polynesian Society, 75(4), 437–444.
(1977) The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 121, 23–32.
Gao, Xuesong
(2012) ‘Cantonese is not a dialect’: Chinese netizens’ defence of Cantonese as a regional lingua franca. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(5), 449–464. .
Garrett, P., Coupland, N., & Williams, A
(2003) Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity, and performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Groves, Julie May
(2008) A comparison of the attitudes of Hong Kongers and Mainland Chinese towards the status of Cantonese: Language or Dialect - or Topolect?Sino-Platonic Papers, Number 179.
Hymes, D.H
(1974) Foundations of sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Karlgren, Bernhard
(1962) Sound and symbol in Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kratochvil, Pail
(1968) The Chinese language today. London: Hutchinson.
Lambert, W.E., Hodgson, R.C., Gardner, R.C., & S. Fillenbaum
(1960) Evaluational reactions to Spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 601, 44–51.
Li, Yuming
(2010) Language planning in the People’s Republic of China. In M.E. van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds.), Industrialization and the restructuring of speech communities in China and Europe (pp. 23–33). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Li, Yanxuan
(2012) Cantonese: Is it a dialect in China or language of the world? Paper for WRA 1004-009, Revising Literacy, April7 2012 (Professor Marohang Limbu, Michigan State University). [URL], accessed on 3/12/2016.
Lyons, John
(1970) New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Mair, Victor H
(1991) What is a Chinese ‘dialect/topolect’? Reflections on some key Sino-English linguistic terms. Sino-Platonic Papers Number 291.
Mau, Wing-yan, Annie
(2005) Cantonese: Language or dialect? MA dissertation. Hong Kong: University of Hongkong.
McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M
(1986) Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 141, 6–23.
(1989) Dialect loss in Maastricht: Attitudes, functions and structures. In K. Deprez (Ed.), Language and intergroup relations in Flanders and in the Netherlands (pp. 99–128). Dordrecht: De Gruyter.
Ni, Viviane
(2011) Getting your employees a Hukou – An unavoidable HR issue in China. China Briefing, May4 2011.
Ramsey, S. Robert
(1987) The languages of China. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Tang, Chaoju, & Van Heuven, Vincent J
(2010) Predicting mutual intelligibility in Chinese dialects from subjective and objective linguistic similarity. In M.E. van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds.), Industrialization and the restructuring of speech communities in China and Europe (pp. 91–119). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tönnies, F
(1887/1955) Community and association. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Trudgill, Peter
(2011) Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van den Berg, M.E
(2010) Socio-economic stratification in the Guangzhou speech community: Language behaviour in shopping areas of Yuexiu and Tianhe Districts. In M.E. van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds.), Industrialization and the restructuring of speech communities in China and Europe (pp. 236–268). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
VanNess Simmons, Richard
(2010) Measuring lexical competition in the four contending dialect types of Jiītán county. In M.E. van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds.), Industrialization and the restructuring of speech communities in China and Europe (pp. 191–235). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wurm, S.A., & Laycock, D.C
(1961) The question of language and dialect in New Guinea. Oceania, 32(2), 128–143.
Xu Daming
(2004) Yanyu shequ lilun [Speech community theory]. Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics, 11, 18–28.
(2010) The formation of a speech community: Mandarin nasal finals in Baotou. In M.E. van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds.), Industrialization and the re-structuring of speech communities in China and Europe (pp. 120–140). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Xu, Daming
(2012) Speech communities in transformation: The effects of linguistic urbanization in China. Plenary Speech at
Sociolinguistics Symposium
191, August 21–24, Berlin, Germany.
Xu, Daming
(2015) Speech community and linguistic urbanization: Sociolinguistic theories developed in China. In Dick Smakman & Patrick Heinrich (Eds.), Globalizing sociolinguistics: Challenging and expanding theory (pp. 95–106). London and New York: Routledge.
(1998) Dialect MT: A case study between Cantonese and Mandarin. In Christian Boitet & Pete Whitelock (Eds.), ‘Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics (pp. 1460–1464). Burlington, Mass.: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers / ACL.
2019. AFRICAN VOICES FROM THE CONGO COAST: LANGUAGES AND THE POLITICS OF IDENTIFICATION IN THE SLAVE SHIPJOVEM MARIA (1850). The Journal of African History 60:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Fang, Xiaobing & Yanhong Ge
2022. Language Strategies in China. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 253 ff.
Ingebretson, Britta
2022. “Living Fossils”: The Politics of Language Preservation in Huangshan, China. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32:1 ► pp. 116 ff.
Wang, Xiaomei & Yin Yin Yeoh
2023. The restructuring of a speech community on a foreign land: the Tianjiners in Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 44:6 ► pp. 467 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.