A multi-layered comparative analysis of English-medium instruction in the Netherlands
The language ideological debate
The rise of English in Dutch higher education has been accompanied by a language ideological debate that affects
students’ and lecturers’ lives at the micro level, policy and planning at the meso (institutional) level and is related to the
macro perspective (national political agenda). This study explores how language ideologies and attitudes play a role in this
debate by comparing lecturers’ perceptions of the use of English in higher education to general language ideologies reflected in
the Dutch printed press. A thematic analysis was conducted, including a three-dimensional investigation incorporating a vertical
approach (macro, meso, micro) combined with a horizontal approach focusing on ideological themes present at the vertical level.
Our data consist of 151 news items and 20 interviews with lecturers in higher education. Results show that monolingual language
ideologies are the norm in both the perceptions of teaching staff and the Dutch media. Lecturers were generally more positive
towards the exclusive use of English than the printed media. The study suggests that the Dutch/English dichotomy and accompanying
persistence of a monolingual language ideology contrast with the reality of the Netherlands as a multilingual community.
Implications for language policy and practice within EMI are presented.
Article outline
- Introduction
- (Language) ideology and language attitudes in HE
- Language ideologies in the media
- Language ideologies in EMI
- Methodology
- Methods of data collection and sample
- Data analysis
- Results
- Language ideologies in the Dutch printed press
- Status and solidarity
- Language ideologies at the micro level: The personal dimension
- Language ideologies at the meso level: The educational dimension
- Language ideologies and attitudes at the macro level: The national dimension
- Language ideologies in the perceptions of teaching staff
- Status and solidarity
- Language ideologies and attitudes at the micro level: The personal dimension
- Language ideologies and attitudes at the meso level: The educational dimension
- Language ideologies and attitudes at the macro level: The national dimension
- Overlap between language ideologies and attitudes
- Discussion
- Language ideologies in the media
- Language ideologies in the perceptions of teaching staff
- The ideological disparities between the printed press and teaching staff
- Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (28)
References
Ajsic, A., & McGroarty, M. (2015). Mapping
language ideologies. In F. Hult & D. C. Cassels (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and
planning (pp. 181–192). Wiley.
Blackledge, A. (2000). Monolingual
ideologies in multilingual states: Language, hegemony and social justice in Western liberal
democracies. Sociolinguistic
Studies,
1
(2), 25–45.
Blommaert, J. (2006). Language
policy and national identity. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 238–254). Blackwell.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology,
3
(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing
and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
de Jong, F. (2018). English
as medium of instruction in higher education in a cross-national context. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. (2011). Internationalisation,
multilingualism and English-medium instruction. World
Englishes,
30
(3), 345–359.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. (2013). Globalisation,
internationalisation, multilingualism and linguistic strains in higher education. Studies in
Higher
Education,
38
(9),1407–1421.
Earls, C. W. (2016). Evolving agendas in European English-medium higher education: Interculturality, multilingualism and language policy. Springer.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On
the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language
Learning,
43
(2), 157–194.
Hamid, M., & Jahan, I. (2015). Language,
identity, and social divides: Medium of instruction debates in Bangladeshi print
media. Comparative Education
Review,
59
(1), 75–101.
Jensen, C., Denver, L., Mees, I. M., & Werther, C. (2013). Students’
attitudes to lecturers’ English in English-medium higher education in Denmark. Nordic Journal
of English
Studies,
13
(1), 87–112.
Jensen, C., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Danish university lecturers’ attitudes towards English as the medium of
instruction. Ibérica,
22
1, 13–34.
Kling, J. (2015). “You
try with a little humour and you just get on with it”: Danish lecturers’ reflections on English-medium
instruction. In S. Dimova, A. K. Hultgren, & C. Jensen (Eds.), English-medium instruction in European higher Education: English in
Europe (pp. 201–222). De Gruyter Mouton.
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English
with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United
States. Routledge.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A
systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language
Teaching,
51
(1), 36–76.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2012). Research
methods in second language acquisition: A practical
guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
Margić, B., & Žeželić, T. (2015). The
implementation of English-medium instruction in Croatian higher education: Attitudes, expectations and
concerns. In R. Plo Alastrué & C. Pérez-Llantada (Eds.), English
as a scientific and research language: Debates and
discourses (pp. 311–332). De Gruyter Mouton.
Muresan, L., & Nicolae, M. (2015). Addressing the challenge of publishing internationally in a non-Anglophone academic context: Romania – a case in
point. In R. Alastrué, & C. Pérez-Llantada (Eds.), English as a scientific and research
language (pp. 281–310). De Gruyter Mouton.
Pinto, S., & Sá, M. H. (2015). Language
learning in higher education: Portuguese student voices. International Journal of
Multilingualism, (
13
)31, 367–382.
Ricento, T. (2013). Language
policy, ideology, and attitudes in English-dominant
countries. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of
sociolinguistics (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press.
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies. Routledge.
Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press.
van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology:
A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
Wilkinson, R., & Gabriëls, R. (2021). Englishization
of Dutch higher education: Divergent language policies and
practices. In R. Wilkinson, & R. Gabriels (Eds.), The Englishization of higher education in
Europe (pp. 237–258). Amsterdam University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid & Peter I. De Costa
2024.
Critical English medium instruction: problematising neocolonial language dominance.
Pedagogy, Culture & Society ► pp. 1 ff.
Robinson-Jones, Charlie, Joana Duarte & Dymphi van der Hoeven
2024.
Students’ attitudes towards accents in English-medium instruction: The role of cosmopolitan and motivation orientations.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 68
► pp. 101330 ff.
Shao, Lijie & Robert Wilkinson
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.