References (12)
References
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). The state nobility. Elite schools in the field of power. Polity Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demeter, M. (2012). On analysis and its role in communication theories. KOME, 1 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Remarks on the logic of irreversible actions. KOME, 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). No thing refers to nothing: On showing the false. KOME, 3 (1), 16–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). Özséb Horányi and the participation theory of communication. In Y. Miike & J. Yin (Eds.), The handbook of global interventions in communication theory (pp. 393–406). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demeter, M., & Gáspár, K. (2015). Prolegomena to an analytic theology of holy images: The visual aspects of faith and philosophical analysis. Kultura – Media – Teologia, 22 1, 80–95.Google Scholar
Háló, G., & Demeter, M. (2022). International VS national academic bibliographies: A comparative analysis of publication and citation patterns in Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Hungarian Scientific Bibliography. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 0 (0), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Central and Eastern Europe in journalism studies: The three-faced disadvantage of underrepresentation, isolation, and Westernization. In B. Mutsvairo, S. Bebawi, & E. Borges-Rey (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Journalism in the Global South (pp. 320–332). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horányi, Ö. (2007). A kommunikáció mint participáció. Typotex Kft.Google Scholar
(2009). Arról, ami szignifikatív és arról, ami kommunikatív; valamint arról, ami problematikus (szinopszis, 7.3 változat). In E. Bagdy, Z. Demetrovics, & J. Pilling (Eds.), Polihistória. Akadémiai Kiadó. [URL]
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.Google Scholar