Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 4:2 (2023) ► pp.109–139

Japanese scientists’ English for research publication purposes

An empirical error analysis

ORCID logo | Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Error Analysis was developed by early Second Language Acquisition (SLA) researchers as a way to investigate interlanguage and better understand the second-language learning processes. While it is no longer an active branch of research in SLA, it remains a useful tool for those concerned with accuracy in language use. Given the elevated importance of accuracy in English for Research and Publication Purposes (ERPP), this may be one area where Error Analysis may continue to inform research and praxis. The high degree of language precision demanded in ERPP contexts can be a source of frustration for many engaged in scholarly publication, especially those for whom English is an additional language, such as the Japanese scientists studied in this paper. For Japanese scientists and possibly others, an empirical profile of their most frequent error patterns may help them to better deal with accuracy in research writing. With this motivation, this study applies a corpus-assisted error analysis framework to quantify sentence-level grammar errors and identify the most frequent error patterns in the research article manuscripts of Japanese scientists. A corpus of 53 research article manuscripts with 4,495 errors comprises the primary data. Additionally, two raters and a comparison of errors from scientists from six different L1 backgrounds are employed to triangulate the data and investigate the reliability and generalizability of the findings. Findings reveal that the top ten most frequent errors comprise 52.9%, or half of all errors in the corpus, and are dominated by errors with determiners and prepositions.
Keywords: accuracy, sentence-level grammar errors, error analysis, Japanese scientists, quantitative research, writing and literacy, needs analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Accuracy in research writing
    • 1.2Error analysis
    • 1.3The study
  • 2.Procedure
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Corpus preparation
    • 2.3Error analysis
    • 2.4Reliability and generalizability
  • 3.Findings
    • 3.1Overview of corpus
    • 3.2Profile of most frequent error patterns
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.22007.mcd
References (44)
References
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003). Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (3), 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burt, M. K., & Kiparsky, C. (1972). The gooficon: A repair manual for English. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Chen, L. L. (2006). The effect of the use of L1 in a multimedia tutorial on grammar learning: An error analysis of Taiwanese beginning EFL learners’ English essays. Asian EFL Journal, 8 (2), 76–110.Google Scholar
Clavero, M. (2010). ‘Awkward wording. Rephrase’: linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25 1, 552–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9 (2), 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., & Granger, S. (1998). Computer-aided error analysis. System, 26 (2), 163–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. M. (2018). Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’. Applied Linguistics, 39 (2), 236–240.Google Scholar
Dinamika, S. G., & Hanafiah, R. (2019). Syntactical error analysis on report text. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 4(2), 120–129.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falhasiri, M., Tavakoli, M., Hasiri, F., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2011). The effectiveness of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on interlingual and intralingual errors: A case of error analysis of students’ compositions. English Language Teaching, 4 (3), 251–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. (2003). The international corpus of learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 37 (3), 538–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gressang, J. E. (2010). A frequency and error analysis of the use of determiners, the relationships between noun phrases, and the structure of discourse in English essays by native English writers and native Chinese, Taiwanese, and Korean learners of English as a second language [Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Iowa]. Iowa Research Online. [URL]. DOI logo
Hamilton, C. E. (2015). The contribution of systemic functional grammar to the error analysis framework. TESOL International Journal, 10 (1), 11–28.Google Scholar
Hartse, J. H., & Kubota, R. (2014). Pluralizing English? Variation in high-stakes academic texts and challenges of copyediting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24 1, 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harwood, N., Austin, L., & Macaulay, R. (2009). Proofreading in a UK university: Proofreaders’ beliefs, practices, and experiences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18 (3), 166–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, A. L., Rahim, H. A., Hua, T. K., & Salehuddin, K. (2011). Collocations in Malaysian English learners’ writing: A corpus-based error analysis. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17 1(Special Issue), 31–44.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Longman.Google Scholar
Khodabandeh, F. (2007). Analysis of students’ errors: The case of headlines. The Asian ESP Journal, 3 (1), 6–21.Google Scholar
Kim, M. (2010). Translation error analysis: A systemic functional grammar approach. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis, & K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applied linguistics methods: A reader (pp. 84–94). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, D., & Chen, S. X. (2009). Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18 (3), 149–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. (2002). Writing for international publication: The perception of Chinese doctoral researchers. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 121, 179–193.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2007). Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16 (2), 100–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, N., & Hyland, K. (2016). Chinese academics writing for publication: English teachers as text mediators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33 1, 43–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25(2), 215–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDowell, L. (2016). An error analysis of Japanese scientists’ research articles [Master’s thesis, Macquarie University]. Macquarie University Digital Theses Collection. DOI logo
(2020). Error analysis: A methodological exploration and application. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & R. Gentry (Eds.), Teacher efficacy, learner agency. JALT.Google Scholar
McDowell, L., & Liardét, C. L. (2019). Japanese materials scientists’ experiences with English for research publication purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37 1, 141–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Towards specialized language support: An elaborated framework for Error Analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 57 1, 16–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (2018). Conceptualizations of language errors, standards, norms and nativeness in English for research publication purposes: An analysis of journal submission guidelines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42 1, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, F., Lillis, T., Donahue, T., Curry, M. J., Ávila Reyes, N., Gustafsson, M., Zavala, V., Lauría, D., Lukin, A., McKinney, C., Feng, H., & Motta-Roth, D. (2022). Rethinking English as a lingua franca in scientific-academic contexts. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 3 (1), 143–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M., & Berkson, K. H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 34 1, 3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1971). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. English Language Teaching, 25 1, 204–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozycki, W., & Johnson, N. H. (2013). Non-canonical grammar in Best Paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 32 (3), 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10 1, 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2002). Challenges of the science register for ESL students: Errors and meaning-making. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 119–142). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Shchemeleva, I. (2021). “There’s no discrimination, these are just the rules of the game”: Russian scholars’ perception of the research writing and publication process in English. Publications, 9 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soler, J. (2021). Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English: Limitations and ways forward in the debate. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 2 (2), 160–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willey, I., & Tanimoto, K. (2013). “Convenience editors” as legitimate participants in the practice of scientific editing: An interview study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12 (1), 23–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar