Clitic pronouns in Archaic Chinese
Redouane Djamouri | CNRS-EHESS-INALCO, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale , France
Waltraud Paul | CNRS-EHESS-INALCO, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale , France
This article provides evidence for the so far neglected existence of two clitic pronouns, yǐ
以 and yǔ
與, in Archaic Chinese (10th c. – 3rd c. BC) in immediately
verb-adjacent position: ‘yǐ/yǔ-V’. While yǔ only encodes the comitative/associative, yǐ encodes all kinds of (argument and adjunct) roles, depending on the semantics of the verb involved. We argue that the clitic pronouns
yǐ and yǔ can neither be analysed as stranded prepositions left behind after extraction
of their complement (as, e.g., in English) nor as orphan prepositions, i.e., PPs with an in situ null
pronoun as complement (as, e.g., in French). This ties in with the general ban against prepositions lacking an overt complement, observed
throughout the history of Chinese.
Keywords: Archaic Chinese, syntax, ban on preposition stranding, orphan preposition, applicative, 以 yǐ
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Overview of the numerous different items yǐ: How many yǐ’s are there?
- 2.1The treatment of yǐ and yǔ in the philological tradition
- 2.2A comprehensive diachronic study of yǐ in Early Archaic Chinese
- 2.2.1Different types of verbs emerging at different periods: ‘To lead, bring along someone’; ‘to carry, take along, hold sb. by the hand sb.’; ‘to use’
- 2.2.2The preposition yǐ
- 2.2.3The preverbal clitic pronoun: yǐ-V
- 2.2.4The coordinating conjunction yǐ ‘and’
- 2.2.5The infinitival T-head yǐ ‘to’
- 2.2.6Purposive conjunction yǐ ‘in order to’
- 2.2.7The verb yǐ ‘use’ in the construction ‘yǐ DP wéi XP’ = ‘use DP to serve as XP’
- 2.3Interim summary
- 3.The syntax and semantics of the prepositions yǐ and yǔ
- 3.1The preposition yǐ
- 3.2The preposition yǔ
- 3.3The distribution of PPs headed by yǐ and yǔ
- 4.The clitic pronouns yǐ and yǔ
- 4.1Previous studies: von der Gabelentz (1881) and Ma Jianzhong (1898)
- 4.1.1 Von der Gabelentz (1881)
- 4.1.2 Ma Jianzhong (1898)
- 4.2Ban on preposition stranding
- 4.3
Yǐ and yǔ are not orphan prepositions
- 4.3.1Orphan prepositions in French
- 4.3.2Syntactic evidence against yǐ and yǔ as orphan prepositions
- 4.4The clitic pronouns yǐ and yǔ and their antecedents
- 4.1Previous studies: von der Gabelentz (1881) and Ma Jianzhong (1898)
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
Published online: 16 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.19024.dja
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.19024.dja
References
References
Aldridge, Edith
2012a Focus and Archaic Chinese Word Order. Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) and the 18th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18), vol. 21, ed. by Lauren Eby Clemens & Chi-Ming Louis Liu, 84–101. Available at: https://naccl.osu.edu/proceedings/naccl-22_iacl-18
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
Belletti, Adriana
Cinque, Guglielmo
Djamouri, Redouane
Djamouri, Redouane & Waltraud Paul
Djamouri, Redouane, Barbara Meisterernst & Waltraud Paul
2009 Particles in Classical Chinese: Complementizers and Topic Markers. Paper presented at the 29th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 10–14 August 2009.
Djamouri, Redouane, Waltraud Paul & John Whitman
2013a Syntactic Change in Chinese and the Argument – Adjunct Asymmetry. Breaking Down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond ed. by Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch, 577–594. Taipei: Academia Sinica [Language and Linguistics monograph series].
Gabelentz, Georg, von der
Guo, Rui
Harbsmeier, Christoph
Ho, Dah-an
2016 Such errors could have been avoided – Review of Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction by William H. Baxter, Laurent Sagart. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 44:1.175–230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24774965
Huang, C.-T. James
Kulikov, Leonid
2012 Vedic Preverbs as Markers of Valency-Changing Derivations Transitivity and Objecthood in Indo-European (Evidence from Old Indo-Aryan). Studies in Language 36:4.721–746. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/781d/be014b311dc646f708b45bfe3c4349082cac.pdf
Law, Paul
Legge, James D. D.
Levi, Jean
Longobardi, Giuseppe
Ma, Jianzhong
Meisterernst, Barbara
2010 Object Preposing in Classical and Pre-Medieval Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19:1.75–102. Retrieved February 21, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40607863. 
Peyraube, Alain
1997 On Word Order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 26:2.3–20. https://www.persee.fr/doc/clao_0153-3320_1997_num_26_1_1502. 
Pinchon, Jacqueline
1972 Les pronoms adverbiaux en et y : problèmes généraux de la représentation pronominale. Geneva: Droz. (Relevant passages extracted from: https://cnrtl.fr/etymologie/en; https://cnrtl.fr/etymologie/y; Centre national de ressources textuelles et lexicales, accessed December 2020).
Radford, Andrew
Ruwet, Nicolas
1990
En et y: deux clitiques pronominaux antilogophoriques. Langages 971.51–81. Available at: http://www.persee.fr/doc/lgge_0458-726x_1990_num_25_97_1574. 
Thesaurus Linguae Sericae
An Historical and Comparative Encyclopaedia of Chinese Conceptual Schemes General Editor Christoph Harbsmeier 何莫邪 Associate Editor Jiang Shaoyu 蔣紹愚 Available at http://tls.uni-hd.de/home_en.lasso
Schuessler, Alex
Wang, Li 王力
Whitman, John
Yang, Shuda 杨树达