Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 2:1 (2012) ► pp.83132
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Bohmann, Axel
2024. Future‐time reference in world Englishes. World Englishes 43:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2016. Reading the intentions of be going to. On the subjectification of future markers. Folia Linguistica 37:1 DOI logo
Daugs, Robert
2021. Contractions, constructions and constructional change. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
DENIS, DEREK & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2018. The changingfuture: competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system. English Language and Linguistics 22:3  pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Dietrich, Nadine
2024. The seamlessness of grammatical innovation: the case of be going to (revisited). Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Fehringer, Carol & Karen P. Corrigan
2015. The rise of the going to future in Tyneside English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 36:2  pp. 198 ff. DOI logo
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2013. The Emergence and Early Development of Present-day’ll. Studia Neophilologica 85:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18],  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2013. The Linguistic Cycle and the Language Faculty. Language and Linguistics Compass 7:4  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2017. Cyclicity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax,  pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.