Review published in:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp. 143158
References

References

Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
2014Old Chinese: a New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. III
1992A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 64]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bodman, Nicolas
1980Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: Data towards Establishing the Nature of the Relationship. Contributions to Historical Linguistics: Issues and Materials, ed. by Frans van Coetsem & Linda R. Waugh, 34–199. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bodt, Tim & Johann-Mattis List
2019Testing the Predictive Strength of the Comparative Method: An Ongoing Experiment on Unattested Words in Western Kho-Bwa Languages. Papers in Historical Phonology 4.22–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coblin, Weldon South
1976Notes on Tibetan Verbal Morphology. T’oung Pao 62(1/3). 45–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986A Sinologist’s Handlist of Sino-Tibetan Lexical Comparisons. Sankt Augustin: Steyler Verlag.Google Scholar
2002On Certain Functions of ’A-chung In Early Tibetan Transcriptional texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 25:2. 169–184.Google Scholar
Conrady, August
1896Eine indochinesische causativ-denominativ-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius
2009A Grammar of Bantawa. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden, Leiden University.
van Driem, George
1993A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Tibeto-Burman Subgroups and Historical Grammar. Himalayan Linguistics 10:1. 31–39.Google Scholar
Fellner, Hannes A. & Nathan W. Hill
2019aThe Differing Status of Reconstruction in Trans-Himalayan and Indo-European. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 48:2. 159–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019bWord Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 48:2. 91–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng
1977 Gǔ zàngwén de y jíqí xiāngguān wèntí 古藏 文的y及其相關問題 [Old Tibetan y and related problems]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 48:2. 205–228.Google Scholar
[ p. 156 ]
1980A Comparative Study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese Vowel Systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 51:3. 455–490.Google Scholar
1995The System of Finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. The Ancestry of Chinese, ed. by William S-.-Y. Wang, 41–92. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2016A Phonological History of Amdo Tibetan Rhymes. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 79:2. 347–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Jiāróng yǔzǔ yǔyán yǔ shànggǔ hànyǔ de xíngtàixué 嘉绒语组语言与上古汉语的形态学. ed. by Haeree Park & Shaoxuan Cheng, 134–156, gǔ wénzì yǔ hànyǔ lìshǐ yīnyùnxué 古文字与汉语历史音韵学 复旦中 华文明研究专刊. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
2018Le rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest : une étude descriptive, typologique et comparative. Doctoral dissertation, Paris, Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales.
Handel, Zev
2019A Brief Response to Fellner and Hill’s “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 48:2. 125–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2005aOnce More on the Letter ’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28:2. 111–141.Google Scholar
2005bThe Verb ’bri ‘to write’ in Old Tibetan. Journal of Asian and African Studies 68. 177–182.Google Scholar
2009Tibetan <h> as a Plain Initial and its Place in Old Tibetan phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 32:1. 115–140.Google Scholar
2013Relative Ordering of Tibetan Sound Changes Affecting Laterals. Language and Linguistics 14:1. 193–209.Google Scholar
2014aGrammatically Conditioned Sound Change. Language and Linguistics Compass 8:6. 211–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bSome Tibetan Verb Forms that Violate Dempsey’s Law. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 29. 91–101.Google Scholar
2014cTibetan. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, ed. by Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer, 620–630. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016aA refutation of Song’s (2014) Explanation of the ’Stop Coda Problem’ in Old Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3:2. 270–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bTibetan *-as > -os. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Reconstruction 12. 163–173.Google Scholar
2019aThe derivation of the Tibetan Present Prefix g- from ḥ-. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 72:3. 325–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019bThe historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. & Johann-Mattis List
2017Challenges of Annotation and Analysis in Computer-Assisted Language Comparison: A Case Study on Burmish Languages. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 3:1. 47–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2017A Grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). Doctoral dissertation, Paris, Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot.
[ p. 157 ]
2007Le nom des nakṣatrāṇi en tibétain. Revue d’études tibétaines 12. 4–10.Google Scholar
2010A Possible Trace of Verbal Agreement in Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 9:1. 41–49.Google Scholar
2013On pre-Tibetan Semi-vowels. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 76:2. 289–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014On Coblin’s law. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, ed. by Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken, 155–166. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2016Le sino-tibétain: polysynthétique ou isolant? Faits de langues 47:1. 61–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti Verb Roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 38. 177–215.Google Scholar
2019The Labial Causative in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of the South-East Asian Linguistic Society 12:1. 1–11.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai
2012An Overview of Khaling Verbal Morphology. Language and Linguistics 13:6. 1095–1170.Google Scholar
Lejeune, Michel
1987Phonétique historique du mycénien et du grec ancien. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei
1933Certain Phonetic Influences of the Tibetan Prefixes upon the Root Initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 6:2. 135–157.Google Scholar
1959Tibetan Glo-ba-’dring. Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren dedicata, ed by. Søren Egerod & Else Glahn. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, 55–59.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing
2016Jiāróngyǔ Zhuókèjīhuà yǔfǎ biāozhù wénběn 嘉戎语卓 克基话语法标注文本 [Cogtse Rgyalrong Texts: Fully Analyzed Spontaeous Narratives with an Updated Sketch Grammar of the Language]. Beijing: Shehui Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Mao, Zongwu
1992Hàn-Yáo cídiǎn (miǎnyǔ) 汉 瑶 词 典 (勉 语) [A Chinese-Mien dictionary]. Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1975 [1921]Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd
2002Limbu-English Dictionary. Kathmandu: Mandala Book Point.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis
2012Monosyllabicization: Patterns of Evolution in Asian languages. Monosyllables: from Phonology to Typology ed. by Thomas Stolz, Nicole Nau & Cornelia Stroh, 115–130. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha
2010Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
2019Dated Language Phylogenies Shed Light on the Ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116:21. 10317–10322. Crossref. https://​www​.pnas​.org​/content​/116​/21​/10317
Schiefner, Anton
1852Tibetischen Studien. Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin historico-philologique de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.Pétersbourg 1. 324–394.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel
2015New Old Chinese. Diachronica 32:4. 571–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Comments on Fellner and Hill: “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 48:2. 142–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p.   ]
Shefts-Chang, Betty
1971The Tibetan Causative: Phonology. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 42:4. 623–765.Google Scholar
Snellgrove, David
1967The Nine Ways of Bon: Excerpts from gZi-brjid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej Anatoljevich
1989Реконструкция древнекитайской фонологической системы [A Reconstruction of the Old Chinese Phonological System]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2000Parallelisms in the Verb Morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1:1. 161–190.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
2019A Review of Fellner and Hill’s “Word Families, Allofams, and the Comparative Method”. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 48:2. 154–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham & Randy LaPolla
(eds.) 2017The Sino-Tibetan languages. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth
2009Proto Kuki-Chin. Berkeley, CA: STEDT Monograph.Google Scholar
Wang, Fushi & Zongwu Mao
1995Miáoyáoyǔ gǔyīn gòunǐ 苗瑶语古音构 拟 [A Reconstruction of proto-Miao-Yao]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y.
1969Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue. Language 45:1. 9–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina
2015Eat and drink – if you can! A Language Internal Explanation for the ‘Irregular’ Paradigm of Tibetan za, zos, zo ‘eat’. Himalayan Linguistics 14:1. 34–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Hypothetical Sound Laws and Sound Potential Meaning. Once Again on the Uncommon Tibetan Verb Paradigm za, zos, zo ‘eat’. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 14. 77–117.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuya, Guillaume Jacques & Yunfan Lai
2019A Study of Cognates between Gyalrong Languages and Old Chinese. Journal of Language Relationship 7:1. 73–92.Google Scholar