Article in:
Journal of Historical Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Old English intensifiers

The beginnings of the English intensifier system

| Purdue University
While many studies have employed variationist methods to examine longitudinal changes in the English intensifier system, to date, no variationist studies have tackled the intensifier system of Old English. By providing a critical view of this system at an earlier stage in the history of the English language, the present study adds to the long tradition of scholarship on intensifiers while providing new insight into their diachronic development. Despite its antiquity, several parallels can be drawn with the intensifier system at later stages in the language. Both internal and external factors are found to constrain this system, with predicative adjectives favoring intensification over attributive adjectives, prose texts having higher intensification rates than verse texts, Latin-based texts having higher intensification rates than vernacular texts, and the rate of intensification increasing over time. The quantitative analysis of the Old English system also increases the time depth necessary for a more detailed reflection on the diachronic recycling, replacement, and renewal of intensifiers. Language contact and borrowing are also postulated as driving forces of innovation and replacement in earlier stages of the English language.
Keywords: intensification, language variation and change, variationist methods, Old English, early Germanic languages
Published online: 02 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20011.str
References

References

Alcorn, Rhona
2011 Pronouns, Prepositions and Probabilities: A Multivariate Study of Old English Word Order. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2007 On the Subjectivity of Intensifiers. Language Sciences 29:4.554–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bäcklund, Ulf
1973 The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
Barnfield, Kate & Isabelle Buchstaller
2010 Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal Developments and New Trends. English World-World 31:3.252–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Winifred Bauer
2002 Adjective Boosters in the English of Young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30:3.244–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2009 Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan & Randolf Quirk
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (Vol. 2). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Register as a Predictor of Linguistic Variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8.9–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biscetti, Stefania
2008 The Diachronic Development of the Intensifier Bloody . English Historical Linguistics 2006, Volume II: Lexical and Semantic Change ed. by M. Gotti, M. Dossena & R. Dury, 117–138. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2014 Oh he is olde dogge at expounding deade sure at a Catechisme: Some Considerations on the History of the Intensifying Adverb dead in English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1.117–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blockley, Mary
2001 Aspects of Old English Poetic Syntax: Where Clauses Begin. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borst, Eugene
1902 Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschung 10). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bosworth-Toller Anglo Saxon Dictionary
online). URL: https/​/Bosworth​.ff​.cuni​.cz
Bousquette, Joshua & Joseph Salmons
2017 Germanic. The Indo-European Languages ed. by M. Kapović, 387–420. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
2016 The History of very: The Directionality of Functional Shift and (Inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20:2.221–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Leslie K. Arnovick
2006 The English Language: A Linguistic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, LeAnn & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2012 A Really Interesting Story: The Influence of Narrative in Linguistic Change. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18:2. https://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol18​/iss2​/2
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Elizabeth E. Traugott
2006 The lady was al demonyak: Historical Aspects of Adverb all . English Language & Linguistics 10:2.345–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bulgin, James, Nicole Elford, Lindsay Harding, Bridget Henley, Suzanne Power & Crystal Walters
2008 So very really variable: Social Patterning of Intensifier use by Newfoundlanders Online. Linguistica Atlantica 29.101–115.Google Scholar
Carli, Linda
1990 Gender, Language, and Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59. 941–951. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cichosz, Anna, Jerzy Gaszewski & Piotr Pęzik
2016 Element Order of Old English and Old High German Translations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cichosz, Anna
2017 Inversion after Clause-Initial Adverbs in Old English: The Special Status of þa, þonne, nu, and swa . Journal of English Linguistics 45:4.308–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson & Merja Kytö
2019 Entirely Innocent: A Historical Sociopragmatic Analysis of Maximizers in the Old Bailey Corpus. English Language & Linguistics 24:4.1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
1995 The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2015 Stability, Stasis and Change. Diachronica 32:4.449–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic
2015 A Multivariate Analysis of the Old English ACC+ DAT Double Object Alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11:2.225–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1977 Where have all the Adjectives Gone? Studies in Language 1.19–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericson, Eston. E.
1932 The Use of swa in Old English. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fettig, Adolf
1934 Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen. Anglistische Forschungen, vol. 79. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert
2017 Do Women (Still) Use more Intensifiers than Men? Recent Changes in the Sociolinguistics of Intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3.345–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan
2015 The Most Under-Used Statistical Method in Corpus Linguistics: Multilevel (and Mixed-Effects) Models. Corpora 10:1.95–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2009 Lexical Borrowing: Concepts and Issues. Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook ed. by M. Haspelmath & U. Tadmor, 35–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
(ed.) 2004 Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 Ebb and Flow: A Cautionary Tale of Language Change. Sounds, Words, Texts, Change: Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (11 ICEHL), ed. by T. Fanego, B. Méndez-Naya & E. Seoane. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2009 Lexical Change. English Language. Description, Variation and Context ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak & Tony McEnery, 286–300. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 On Some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, Sheila. M.
1978 Intensive and Restrictive Modification in Old English (Vol. 124). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2003 Well Weird, Right Dodgy, Very Strange, Really Cool: Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers. Language in Society 32:2.257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. & Brian D. Joseph
2003 On Language, Change, and Language Change; Or, of History, Linguistics, and Historical Linguistics. Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 3–180. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E.
2009 Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1.359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1987 Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Word Order in Old English Prose and Poetry: The Position of Finite Verbs and Adverbs. Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective ed. by Donka Minkova & Robert P. Stockwell, 355–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Gustav
1955 Gradadverbien: Restriktiva und Verwandtes im heutigen Englisch. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Klein, Henry
1998 Adverbs of Degree in Dutch and Related Languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja, Viktor Becher & Steffan Höder
2011 A Tentative Typology of Translation-Induced Language Change. Multilingual Discourse Production: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives ed. by S. Kranich, V. Becher, S. Höder & J. House, 11–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Getrud
1934 Die Intensiv-Adverbien des Frühneuenglischen. Heidelberg: König & Lieb.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja
(ed.) 1996 Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding Conventions and List of Source Texts. (3rd edn.). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1966 The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1969 Contraction, Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the English Copula. Language 45:4.715–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1992 Historical Linguistics: An Introduction (3rd edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2008 Booster Prefixes in Old English – An Alternative View of the Roots of ME forsooth. English Language & Linguistics 12:2.245–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter
2002 Really Worthwhile or not Really Significant? A Corpus-Based Approach to the Delexicalisation and Grammaticalisation of Intensifiers in Modern English. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by I. Wischer & G. Diewald, 143–161. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
2006 Pure Grammaticalization: The Development of a Teenage Intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18:3.267–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2004 Corpus Linguistics and Grammaticalization Theory. Statistics, Frequency and Beyond. Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English ed. by In H. Linquist & C. Mair, 121–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Richard
2015 The Cambridge Old English Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2003 On Intensifiers and Grammaticalization: The Case of swiþe . English Studies 84:4.372–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2008 Special Issue on English Intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics 12:2.213–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Synthetic Intensification Devices in Old English. [Paper within the workshop Degree Phenomena in the History of English ], chaired by Merja Kytö (University of Uppsala) and Claudia Claridge (University of Augsburg).
2021 Synthetic Intensification Devices in Old English. Journal of English Linguistics 14:2.208–227.Google Scholar
2019 The Intensifier System of the Ormulum and the Interplay of Micro-level and Macro-level Contexts in Linguistic Change. Grammar–Discourse–Context: Grammar and Usage in Language Variation and Change ed. by K. Bech & R. Möhlig-Falke, 93–124. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & Päivi Pahta
2010 Intensifiers in Competition: The Picture from Early English Medical Writing. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies ed. by Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta, 191–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1976 The Expression of Extent and Degree in Old English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 77:1.25–31.Google Scholar
1985 Old English Syntax: Concord, the Parts of Speech, and the Sentence (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth
2015 Using the Dictionary of Old English Corpus for Linguistic Analyses: A Basic Classification of the Textual Sources. Neuphilologische Mitteilugen 116:2.395–420.Google Scholar
Morris, Richard
1880 The Blickling Homilies of the Tenth Century: From the Marquis of Lothian’s Unique M.S. AD 971. Accessible at https://​archive​.org​/details​/blicklinghomili00morrgoog​/page​/n141​/mode​/2up.
Most, Sheila M.
1969 Intensive and Restrictive Modification in a Select Corpus of Old English Poetry and Prose. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno
1960 A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1997 The Process of Adverb Derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. The Process of Adverb Derivation in Late and Modern English ed. by Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Helkkonen, 145–189. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma & Ignacio Palacios-Martínez
2018 Intensifiers in MLE: New Trends and Developments. Nordic Journal of English Studies 17:2.115–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED: Oxford English Dictionary
. Online 2nd edition 1989 <oed​.com.
Pahta, Päivi
2006 This is Very Important: A Corpus Study of Amplifiers in Medical Writing. Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, ed. by Maurizo Gotti & F. Salager-Meyer, 357–382. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2008 Configurations, Construals and Change: Expressions of Degree. English Language and Linguistics 12:2.317–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
1993 Corpus Evidence of Language Change: The Case of Intensifiers. Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena-Bonelli, 177–192). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peltola, Niilo
1969 Contributions to the Study of Intensives. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 70:1.33–53.Google Scholar
1971 Observations on Intensification in Old English Poetry. Neuphilologsiche Mitteilungen 72:4.649–690.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans
1993 Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie Booster. Narr: Tübingen.Google Scholar
1994 Degree Adverbs in Early Modern English. Studies in Early Modern English ed. by Dieter Kastovsky, 269–288. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor
2006 The Loss of OV Order in the History of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English, 249–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1995 Variation and Change in Old English Clause Structure. Language Variation and Change 7:2.229–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Clause Structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Sali A. Tagliamonte
1998 There’s No Tense like the Present: Verbal -s Inflection in Early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1:1.47–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2013 R – A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Accessible at http://​www​.R​-project​.org.
Rickford, John, Thomas Wasow, Arnold Zwicky & Isabelle Buchstaller
2007 Intensive and Quotative all; Something Old, Something New. American Speech 82:1.3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kytö, Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö, Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
1991 Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Diachronic and Dialectal (Helsinki).Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
2006 Latin Influence on an Old English Idiom: “To wit”. Inside Old English: Essays in Honour of Bruce Mitchell ed. by J. Walmsley, 222–241. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Hans & Gary Waxenberger
2012 Old English: Dialects. English Historical Linguistics 1 [=Handbücher zur Sprachwissenschaft 34.1], ed. by Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton, 340–351. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin
2020 Analyzing Change in the American English Amplifier System in the Fiction Genre. Corpora and the Changing Society: Studies in the Evolution of English ed. by P. Rautionaho, A. Nurmi & J. Klemola, 223–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1999 He was Really Gormless – She’s Bloody Crap: Girls, Boys and Intensifiers. Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson ed. by Hide Hasselgaard & Signe Okesfjell, 69–78. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoffel, Cornelis
1901 Intensives and Downtoners. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Stratton, James M.
2018 The Use of the Adjective Intensifier well in British English: A Case Study of The Inbetweeners . English Studies 99:8. 793–816. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020a ‘That’s proper cool’. The Emerging Intensifier proper in British English. English Today 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020b A Diachronic Analysis of the Adjective Intensifier well from Early Modern English to Present Day English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 65:2.216–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020c Corpora and Diachronic Analysis of English. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Approaches to Discourse Analysis ed. by Eric Friginal & Jack A. Hardy, 202–218. London & New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020d Adjective Intensifiers in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32:2.183–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John & Amy Burk
2003 “It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in Evaluative Adjectives across Academic Registers. Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use ed by P. Leistyna & C. F. Meyer, 1–18. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A.
2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis
2014 Expanding the Transmission/Diffusion Dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90:1.90–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Chris Roberts
2005 So Weird; So Cool; So Innovative: The Use of Intensifiers in the Television Series Friends . American Speech 80:3.280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2016 So Sick or So Cool? The Language of Youth on the Internet. Language in Society 45:1.1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 So Different and Pretty Cool! Recycling Intensifiers in Canadian English. English Language and Linguistics (=Special issue of English Language and Linguistics, Intensifiers, ed. by Belén Méndez-Naya) 12:2.361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2015 Verb Order, Object Position, and Information Status in Old English. Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions ed. by T. Biberauer & G. Walkden, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann
2008 Contact Effects of Translation: Distinguishing Two Kinds of Influence in Old English. Language Variation and Change 20:2.341–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1990 Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2010 Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Susanne
2019 Why very good in India might be pretty good in North America: Amplifier-Adjective 2-grams in Global Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24.4, 445–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph
1899 A Primer of the Gothic Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Richard
2012 Rule Independence and Rule Conditioning: Grammar Competition in Old English Relative Clauses. Proceedings of ConSOLE XX, 315, 332.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
2005 Just between Dr. Language and I. Language Log post 7 August 2005 <https://​itre​.cis​.upenn​.edu​/~myl​/languagelog​/archives​/002386​.html.