While many studies have employed variationist methods to examine longitudinal changes in the English intensifier
system, to date, no variationist studies have tackled the intensifier system of Old English. By providing a critical view of this
system at an earlier stage in the history of the English language, the present study adds to the long tradition of scholarship on
intensifiers while providing new insight into their diachronic development. Despite its antiquity, several parallels can be drawn
with the intensifier system at later stages in the language. Both internal and external factors are found to constrain this
system, with predicative adjectives favoring intensification over attributive adjectives, prose texts having higher
intensification rates than verse texts, Latin-based texts having higher intensification rates than vernacular texts, and the rate
of intensification increasing over time. The quantitative analysis of the Old English system also increases the time depth
necessary for a more detailed reflection on the diachronic recycling, replacement, and renewal of intensifiers. Language contact
and borrowing are also postulated as driving forces of innovation and replacement in earlier stages of the English language.
Alcorn, Rhona. 2011. Pronouns,
Prepositions and Probabilities: A Multivariate Study of Old English Word Order. Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. On
the Subjectivity of Intensifiers. Language
Sciences 29:4.554–564.
Bäcklund, Ulf. 1973. The
Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in
English. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.
Bauer, Laurie & Winifred Bauer. 2002. Adjective
Boosters in the English of Young New Zealanders. Journal of English
Linguistics 30:3.244–257.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register,
Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan & Randolf Quirk. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written
English (Vol. 21). London: Longman.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation
across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas. 2012. Register
as a Predictor of Linguistic Variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic
Theory 81.9–37.
Biscetti, Stefania. 2008. The
Diachronic Development of the Intensifier Bloody. English Historical
Linguistics 2006, Volume II: Lexical and Semantic Change ed. by M. Gotti, M. Dossena & R. Dury, 117–138. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia. 2014. Oh
he is olde dogge at expounding deade sure at a Catechisme: Some Considerations on the History of the Intensifying Adverb
dead in English. Acta Linguistica
Hafniensia 46:1.117–136.
Blockley, Mary. 2001. Aspects
of Old English Poetic Syntax: Where Clauses Begin. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree
Words. The Hague: Mouton.
Borst, Eugene. 1902. Die
Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschung
10). Heidelberg: Winter.
Bousquette, Joshua & Joseph Salmons. 2017. Germanic. The
Indo-European Languages ed. by M. Kapović, 387–420. New York: Routledge.
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse. 2016. The
History of very: The Directionality of Functional Shift and
(Inter)subjectification. English Language and
Linguistics 20:2.221–249.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Leslie K. Arnovick. 2006. The
English Language: A Linguistic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization
and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, LeAnn & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2012. A
Really Interesting Story: The Influence of Narrative in Linguistic Change. University of
Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18:2. <[URL]>
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Elizabeth E. Traugott. 2006. The
lady was al demonyak: Historical Aspects of Adverb all. English Language &
Linguistics 10:2.345–370.
Bulgin, James, Nicole Elford, Lindsay Harding, Bridget Henley, Suzanne Power & Crystal Walters. 2008. So
very really variable: Social Patterning of Intensifier use by Newfoundlanders
Online. Linguistica
Atlantica 291.101–115.
Carli, Linda. 1990. Gender,
Language, and Influence. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 591. 941–951.
Cichosz, Anna. 2017. Inversion
after Clause-Initial Adverbs in Old English: The Special Status of þa, þonne, nu, and
swa. Journal of English
Linguistics 45:4.308–337.
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson & Merja Kytö. 2019. Entirely
Innocent: A Historical Sociopragmatic Analysis of Maximizers in the Old Bailey Corpus. English
Language &
Linguistics 24:4.1–20.
Crystal, David. 1995. The
Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2015. A
Multivariate Analysis of the Old English ACC+ DAT Double Object Alternation. Corpus Linguistics
and Linguistic
Theory 11:2.225–254.
Gries, Stefan. 2015. The
Most Under-Used Statistical Method in Corpus Linguistics: Multilevel (and Mixed-Effects)
Models. Corpora 10:1.95–125.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Lexical
Borrowing: Concepts and Issues. Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative
Handbook ed. by M. Haspelmath & U. Tadmor, 35–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2004. Legacies
of Colonial English: Studies in Transported
Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hickey, Raymond. 2002. Ebb
and Flow: A Cautionary Tale of Language Change. Sounds, Words, Texts, Change: Selected Papers
from the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (11 ICEHL), ed.
by T. Fanego, B. Méndez-Naya & E. Seoane. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2009. Lexical
Change. English Language. Description, Variation and Context ed.
by Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak & Tony McEnery, 286–300. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hopper, Paul J.1991. On Some Principles of
Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume 1: Focus on Theoretical and
Methodological Issues, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ingersoll, Sheila. M.1978. Intensive and Restrictive Modification
in Old
English (Vol. 1241). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Ito, Rika & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2003. Well
Weird, Right Dodgy, Very Strange, Really Cool: Layering and Recycling in English
Intensifiers. Language in
Society 32:2.257–279.
Janda, Richard D. & Brian D. Joseph. 2003. On
Language, Change, and Language Change; Or, of History, Linguistics, and Historical
Linguistics. Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed.
by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 3–180. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation
in English and Other Languages. London: Allen & Unwin.
Johnson, Daniel E.2009. Getting off the GoldVarb
Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics
Compass 3:1.359–383.
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic
Case and Morphological Case in the History of
English. Dordrecht: Foris.
van Kemenade, Ans. 2002. Word
Order in Old English Prose and Poetry: The Position of Finite Verbs and Adverbs. Studies in the
History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective ed. by Donka Minkova & Robert P. Stockwell, 355–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kirchner, Gustav. 1955. Gradadverbien:
Restriktiva und Verwandtes im heutigen
Englisch. Halle: Niemeyer.
Kranich, Svenja, Viktor Becher & Steffan Höder. 2011. A
Tentative Typology of Translation-Induced Language Change. Multilingual Discourse Production:
Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives ed. by S. Kranich, V. Becher, S. Höder & J. House, 11–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kühner, Getrud. 1934. Die
Intensiv-Adverbien des
Frühneuenglischen. Heidelberg: König & Lieb.
Kytö, Merja (ed.). 1996. Manual
to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding Conventions and List of Source
Texts. (3rd
edn.). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Labov, William. 1966. The
Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction,
Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the English
Copula. Language 45:4.715–762.
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic
Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles
of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Vol. 1: Internal
Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Marsden, Richard. 2015. The
Cambridge Old English Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2003. On
Intensifiers and Grammaticalization: The Case of swiþe. English
Studies 84:4.372–391.
Méndez-Naya, Belén (ed.). 2008. Special
Issue on English Intensifiers. English Language and
Linguistics 12:2.213–219.
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2018. Synthetic
Intensification Devices in Old English. [Paper within the workshop
Degree Phenomena in the History of English
], chaired
by Merja Kytö (University of Uppsala) and Claudia Claridge (University of Augsburg).
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2021. Synthetic Intensification Devices in Old English. Journal of English Linguistics 14:2.208–227.
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2019. The
Intensifier System of the Ormulum and the Interplay of Micro-level and Macro-level Contexts in Linguistic
Change. Grammar–Discourse–Context: Grammar and Usage in Language Variation and
Change ed. by K. Bech & R. Möhlig-Falke, 93–124. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Mitchell, Bruce. 1976. The
Expression of Extent and Degree in Old English. Neuphilologische
Mitteilungen 77:1.25–31.
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old
English Syntax: Concord, the Parts of Speech, and the
Sentence (Vol. 21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth. 2015. Using
the Dictionary of Old English Corpus for Linguistic Analyses: A Basic Classification of the Textual
Sources. Neuphilologische
Mitteilugen 116:2.395–420.
Morris, Richard. 1880. The
Blickling Homilies of the Tenth Century: From the Marquis of Lothian’s Unique M.S. AD
971. Accessible at <[URL]>.
Most, Sheila M.1969. Intensive and Restrictive
Modification in a Select Corpus of Old English Poetry and Prose. Doctoral
Dissertation, Northwestern University.
Mustanoja, Tauno. 1960. A
Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1997. The
Process of Adverb Derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. The Process of Adverb
Derivation in Late and Modern English ed. by Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Helkkonen, 145–189. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma & Ignacio Palacios-Martínez. 2018. Intensifiers
in MLE: New Trends and Developments. Nordic Journal of English
Studies 17:2.115–155.
OED: Oxford English Dictionary. Online 2nd
edition, 1989. <[URL]>.
Pahta, Päivi. 2006. This
is Very Important: A Corpus Study of Amplifiers in Medical Writing. Advances in Medical
Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, ed. by Maurizo Gotti & F. Salager-Meyer, 357–382. Bern: Peter Lang.
Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations,
Construals and Change: Expressions of Degree. English Language and
Linguistics 12:2.317–343.
Peltola, Niilo. 1969. Contributions
to the Study of Intensives. Neuphilologische
Mitteilungen 70:1.33–53.
Peltola, Niilo. 1971. Observations
on Intensification in Old English Poetry. Neuphilologsiche
Mitteilungen 72:4.649–690.
Peters, Hans. 1993. Die
englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie
Booster. Narr: Tübingen.
Peters, Hans. 1994. Degree
Adverbs in Early Modern English. Studies in Early Modern English ed.
by Dieter Kastovsky, 269–288. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor. 2006. The
Loss of OV Order in the History of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The
Handbook of the History of English, 249–278.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1995. Variation
and Change in Old English Clause Structure. Language Variation and
Change 7:2.229–260.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase
Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Clause Structure. New York: Garland.
Poplack, Shana & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 1998. There’s
No Tense like the Present: Verbal -s Inflection in Early Black
English. Language Variation and
Change 1:1.47–84.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.
R Core Team. 2013. R – A Language and
Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Accessible
at <[URL]>.
Rickford, John, Thomas Wasow, Arnold Zwicky & Isabelle Buchstaller. 2007. Intensive
and Quotative all; Something Old, Something New. American
Speech 82:1.3–31.
Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kytö, Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö, Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1991. Helsinki
Corpus of English Texts: Diachronic and
Dialectal (Helsinki).
Rissanen, Matti. 2006. Latin
Influence on an Old English Idiom: “To wit”. Inside Old English: Essays in Honour of Bruce
Mitchell ed. by J. Walmsley, 222–241. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sauer, Hans & Gary Waxenberger. 2012. Old
English: Dialects. English Historical Linguistics 1 [=Handbücher zur
Sprachwissenschaft 34.1], ed. by Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton, 340–351. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1999. He
was Really Gormless – She’s Bloody Crap: Girls, Boys and Intensifiers. Out of Corpora: Studies
in Honour of Stig Johansson ed. by Hide Hasselgaard & Signe Okesfjell, 69–78. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
Stoffel, Cornelis. 1901. Intensives
and Downtoners. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Stratton, James M.2018. The Use of the Adjective
Intensifier well in British English: A Case Study of The
Inbetweeners. English
Studies 99:8. 793–816.
Stratton, James M.2020a. ‘That’s proper cool’. The
Emerging Intensifier proper in British English. English
Today 1–8.
Stratton, James M.2020b. A Diachronic Analysis of the
Adjective Intensifier well from Early Modern English to Present Day
English. Canadian Journal of
Linguistics 65:2.216–245.
Stratton, James M.2020c. Corpora and Diachronic Analysis
of English. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Approaches to Discourse
Analysis ed. by Eric Friginal & Jack A. Hardy, 202–218. London & New York: Routledge.
Stratton, James M.2020d. Adjective Intensifiers in
German. Journal of Germanic
Linguistics 32:2.183–215.
Swales, John & Amy Burk. 2003. “It’s
really fascinating work”: Differences in Evaluative Adjectives across Academic
Registers. Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use ed
by P. Leistyna & C. F. Meyer, 1–18. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis. 2014. Expanding
the Transmission/Diffusion Dichotomy: Evidence from
Canada. Language 90:1.90–136.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Chris Roberts. 2005. So
Weird; So Cool; So Innovative: The Use of Intensifiers in the Television Series
Friends. American
Speech 80:3.280–300.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.2016. So Sick or So Cool? The Language
of Youth on the Internet. Language in
Society 45:1.1–32.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.2008. So Different and Pretty Cool!
Recycling Intensifiers in Canadian English. English Language and
Linguistics (=Special issue of English Language and Linguistics,
Intensifiers, ed. by Belén Méndez-Naya) 12:2.361–394.
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk. 2015. Verb
Order, Object Position, and Information Status in Old English. Syntax over Time: Lexical,
Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions ed. by T. Biberauer & G. Walkden, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Ann. 2008. Contact
Effects of Translation: Distinguishing Two Kinds of Influence in Old English. Language
Variation and
Change 20:2.341–365.
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language
Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Trudgill, Peter. 1990. Dialects
in
Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Investigations
in Sociohistorical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, Joseph. 1899. A
Primer of the Gothic Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zimmermann, Richard. 2012. Rule
Independence and Rule Conditioning: Grammar Competition in Old English Relative
Clauses. Proceedings of
ConSOLE XX1, 315, 332.
Zwicky, Arnold. 2005. Just
between Dr. Language and I. Language Log
post, 7August 2005. <[URL]>.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Schweinberger, Martin
2024. A corpus‐based analysis of adjective amplification in Hong Kong, Indian and Philippine English. World Englishes
Scheffler, Tatjana, Michael Richter & Roeland van Hout
2023. Tracing and classifying German intensifiers via information theory. Language Sciences 96 ► pp. 101535 ff.
Stratton, James M.
2022. Tapping into German Adjective Variation: A Variationist Sociolinguistic Approach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Stratton, James M.
2023. Where didwergo? Lexical variation and change in third-person male adult noun referents in Old and Middle English. Language Variation and Change 35:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.