Article published in:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp. 299341
References

References

Adelaar, Alexander
2005The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar: A Historical Perspective. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar ed. by Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aldridge, Edith
2003Remnant Movement in Tagalog Relative Clause Formation. Linguistic Inquiry, Squibs and Discussion 34:4.631–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar
2012aAntipassive in Austronesian Alignment Change. Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 332–346. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012bAntipassive and Ergativity in Tagalog. Lingua 122:3.192–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Shanley
2013The Acquisition of Ergativity in Inuktitut. The Acquisition of Ergativity ed by Edith Laura Bavin & Sabine Stoll, 71–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning
1972Diphthongization. Language 48.11–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
2007The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 132–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Edna
1990Markedness Theory: The Union of Asymmetry and Semiosis in Language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arka, Wayan I.
2017The Core–Oblique Distinction in Some Austronesian Languages of Indonesia and Beyond. Linguistik Indonesia 35:2.101–144.Google Scholar
[ p. 333 ]
Bautista, M. L. S.
1983Word Order in Tagalog Child Language. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 14:1.25–44.Google Scholar
Beach, Matthew
2011Studies in Inuktitut Grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Berge, Anna
2011Topic and Discourse in West Greenlandic Agreement Constructions. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2010Capturing Particulars and Universals in Clause Linkage: A Multivariate Analysis. Clause-Hierarchy and Clause-Linking: The Syntax and Pragmatics Interface ed. by Isabelle Bril, 51–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Maria
1987On the Semantics of the Greenlandic Antipassive and Related Constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53:2.194–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Canonical and Noncanonical Argument Expressions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
1994Case, Scope, and Binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1917Tagalog Texts with Grammatical Analysis: List of Formations and Glossary. Vol. 3. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert
2013The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke
1991Case and Agreement in Inuit. Berlin: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2011Markedness: Iconicity, Economy and Frequency. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology ed. by Jae Jung Song, 131–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, Julien
2012L’expression de la transitivité en itivimiut. Master’s thesis, Université du Québec, Montréal.Google Scholar
2017The Ergative-Antipassive Alternation in Inuktitut: Analyzed in a Case of New-Dialect Formation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62:4.661–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Ergativity on the Move. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1975The Pear Film. Berkeley: University of California. 5:55 minutes.Google Scholar
Chen, Victoria & Bradley McDonnell
2019Western Austronesian Voice. Annual Review of Linguistics 5.173–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayre, Beatrice
2005Kelabitic Languages and the Fate of ‘Focus’: Evidence from the Kerayan. The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies ed. by I Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross, 17–57. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2014A Preliminary Typology of the Languages of Middle Borneo. Advances in Research on Linguistic and Cultural Practices in Borneo (Borneo Research Council Monograph Series 15), ed. by Peter Sercombe, Michael Boutin & Adrian Clynes, 123–151. Phillips, ME: Borneo Research Council.Google Scholar
Compton, Richard
2017Ergativity in Inuktitut. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity ed. by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, 329–394. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 334 ]
Comrie, Bernard, Madzhid Khalilov & Zaira Khalilova
2015Valency and Valency Classes in Bezhta. Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, ed. by Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie, 541–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Constantino, Ernesto
1971Tagalog and Other Major Languages of the Philippines. Current Trends in Linguistics 8:1.112–154.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1987Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro Narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988The Antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the Theme of Transitivity. Passive and Voice (Typological Studies in Language 16) ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994A Functional Typology of Antipassives. Voice: Form and Function ed. by Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann, Barbara A. Fox & Talmy Givón
1984The Discourse Definition of Ergativity. Studies in Language 8:1.1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creider, Chet
1978The Syntax of Relative Clauses in Inuktitut. Études Inuit Studies 2.95–110.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2016Transitivity, Valency and Voice. Porquerolles: European Summer School in Linguistic Typology, ms.Google Scholar
2018The Obligatory Coding Principle in Diachronic Perspective. Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony ed. by Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga, 59–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003Typology and Universals. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
2011Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon D.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Ed. by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorais, Louis-Jacques
2003Inuit Uqausiqatigiit: Inuit Languages and Dialects. Iqaluit (NU): Nunavut Arctic College.Google Scholar
Dresher, Elan & Alana Johns
1996Rigolet and Phonological Change in Labrador. Études Inuit Studies 20:1.113–121.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1997Are Grammatical Relations Universal. Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Givón, ed. by Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, John A.
1985Competing Motivations. Iconicity in Syntax ed. by John Haiman, 343–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language 64.805–855.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
2007Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Stefanie & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2014A and O as Each Other’s Mirror Image? Problems with Markedness Reversal. Linguistic Typology 18:1. 3–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 335 ]
Foley, William A.
2008The Place of Philippine Languages in a Typology of Voice Systems. Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages ed. by Peter, Austin K. & Simon Musgrave, 22–44. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D.
1984West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
1990The Origin of NP Split Ergativity. Language 66.261–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gault, JoAnn M.
1999An Ergative Description of Sama Bangingiʼ. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(ed.) 1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Markedness in Grammar: Distributional, Communicative and Cognitive Correlates of Syntactic Structure. Studies in Language 15:2.335–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1994Voice and Inversion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The Story of Zero. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1966Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, Jadranka
1989Defining Markedness. Markedness in Synchrony and Diachrony ed. by Olga Miseska Tomic, 47–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hallman, Peter
2008Definiteness in Inuktitut. University of Toronto, unpubl. ms.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006Against Markedness (and What to Replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42:1.25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021aExplaining Grammatical Coding Asymmetries: Form-Frequency Correspondences and Predictability. Journal of Linguistics 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021bRole-Reference Associations and the Explanation of Argument Coding Splits. Linguistics 59:1.123–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Irene Hartmann
2015Comparing Verbal Valency across Languages. Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, ed. by Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie, 41–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2016Referential Hierarchies and Alignment: An Overview. Linguistics 54:3.433–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Midori
2011The Structure of Multiple Tenses in Inuktitut. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Midori & Bettina Spreng
2005Is Inuktitut Tenseless? Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. by Claire Gurski, 1–12. https://​cla​-acl​.artsci​.utoronto​.ca​/actes​-2005​-proceedings/
Heaton, Raina
2017A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
[ p. 336 ]
Hemmings, Charlotte
2015Kelabit Voice: Philippine-Type, Indonesian-Type or Something a Bit Different? Transactions of the Philological Society 113:3.383–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The Kelabit Language, Austronesian Voice and Syntactic Typology. Doctoral Dissertation, SOAS University of London.Google Scholar
2017Discourse Topicality in the Languages of Northern Sarawak. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (LAGB), University of Kent, 4–6 September 2017.
2019Differential Case Marking in Northern Sarawak. Paper presented at the Linguistics Department Seminar Series, University of Essex. 2 May 2019.
2020Methods in Language Documentation and Description: A Guide to the Kelabit Documentation Project. Journal of Modern Languages 30:1. 6–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021aWhen an Antipassive Isn’t an Antipassive Anymore: The Actor Voice Construction in Kelabit. Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions ed. by Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, 579–620. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021bSubjects in Austronesian: Evidence from Kelabit. Modular Design of Grammar: Linguistics on the Edge ed. by I Wayan Arka, Ash Asudeh & Tracy Holloway King. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2005The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological Characteristics. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar ed. by Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, 110–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56:2.251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Lillian M.
1994Ergativity in Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 33:1.129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Alfred B.
1978Linguistic Relations among Bornean Peoples with Special Reference to Sarawak: An Interim Report. Studies in Third-World Societies 3.1–44.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2021Variation in the Verbal Marking of Antipassive Constructions. Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions ed. by Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, 249–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021The Multifaceted Nature of Antipassive Constructions. Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions ed. by Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, 1–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Alana
1987Transitivity and Grammatical Relations in Inuktitut. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
1999The Decline of Ergativity in Labrador Inuttut. Papers from the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Native American Languages ed. by Leora Bar-El, Rose-Marie Déchaine & Charlotte Reinholtz. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17.73–90.Google Scholar
2001Ergative to Accusative: Comparing Evidence from Inuktitut. Grammatical Relations in Change ed. by Jan Terje Faarlund, 205–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 337 ]
2006Ergativity and Change in Inuktitut. Ergativity: Emerging Issues ed. by Alana Johns, Diane Massam & Juvénal Ndayiragije, 293–311. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Anaphoric Arguments in Unangax and Eastern Canadian Inuktitut. Studies in Inuit Linguistics: In Honor of Michael Fortescue ed. by Lawrence D. Kaplan, Anna Berge & Michael D. Fortescue, 91–103. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Johns, Alana & Ivon Kučerová
2017On the Morphosyntactic Reflexes of Information Structure in the Ergative Patterning of Inuit Language. Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics ed. by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis, 397–418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalmár, Ivan
1979The Antipassive and Grammatical Relations in Eskimo. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations ed. by Frans Plank, 117–143. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katagiri, Masumi
2005Voice, Ergativity and Transitivity in Tagalog and Other Philippine Languages: A Typological Perspective. The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies ed. by I Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross, 153–174. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2005Aspects of Pragmatic Focus in Tagalog. The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies ed. by I Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross, 175–196. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, ANU.Google Scholar
2017Lexical Category and Alignment in Austronesian. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity ed. by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis, 589–630. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kikusawa, Ritsuko
2017Ergativity and Language Change in Austronesian Languages. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity ed. by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, Samuel
1851Grammatik der grönländischen Sprache mit theilweisem Eischluss des Labrador dialects. Berlin: Verlag Georg Reimer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic Notions of Information Structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55:3–4.243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, Paul
1993Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2004Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latrouite, Anja
2011Voice and Case in Tagalog: The Coding of Prominence and Orientation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Latrouite, Anja & Robert D. Van Valin
2014Referentiality and Telicity in Lakhota and Tagalog. Meaning and Grammar of Nouns and Verbs ed. by Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite & Albert Ortmann, 401–426. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 338 ]
Lazard, Gilbert
1989Transitivity and Markedness: The Antipassive in Accusative Languages. Markedness in Synchrony and Diachrony ed. by Olga Mišeska Tomić, 309–331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2003What is an Object in a Crosslinguistic Perspective? Romance Objects: Transitivity in Romance Languages ed. by Giuliana Fiorentino, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1985Markedness and Antonymy. Journal of Linguistics 21.397–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liao, Hsiu-Chuan
2004Transitivity and Ergativity in Formosan and Philippine Languages. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maclachlan, Anna
1996Aspects of Ergativity in Tagalog. Doctoral Dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher D.
1996Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford University, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Martin, Peter W.
1996A Comparative Ethnolinguistic Survey of the Murut (Lun Bawang) with Special Reference to Brunei. Language Use and Language Change in Brunei Darussalam ed. by Peter W. Martin, Conrad Oz̊óg & Gloria R. Poedjosoedarmo, 268–279. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer
1969Frog, Where are You? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
McFarland, Curtis D.
1978Definite Objects and Subject Selection in Philippine Languages. Studies in Philippine Linguistics 2:1.139–182.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1994The Implications of Ergativity for a Philippine Voice System. Voice: Form and Function ed. by Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper, 247–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, Tadataka
1998The Oblique Case in the Three-Place Antipassive Construction in Upper Kobuk Iñupiaq. Master’s Thesis, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
2006Agentive and Patientive Verb Bases in North Alaskan Inupiaq. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nolasco, Ricardo
2005What Ergativity in Philippine Languages Really Means? Proceedings of the Taiwan-Japan Joint Workshop on Austronesian Languages, 215–238.
Payne, Thomas E.
1982Role and Reference Related Subject Properties and Ergativity in Yup’ik Eskimo and Tagalog. Studies in Language 6:1.75–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2017Antipassive. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity ed. by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Kent
1930Iglulik and Caribou Eskimo Texts. (Report of the 5th Thule expedition 1921–1924). Vol. 7:3. Copenhagen: Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Riesberg, Sonja
2014Symmetrical Voice and Linking in Western Austronesian Languages, Pacific Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1978Principles of Categorization. Cognition and Categorization ed. by Eleanor Rosch, Barbara Bloom Lloyd & Social Science Research Council (U.S.), 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
[ p. 339 ]
Ross, Malcolm
2009Proto Austronesian Verbal Morphology: A Reappraisal. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust ed. by Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley, 295–236. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rowsell, Lorna
1983An Ergative Analysis of Kapampangan. Masters Thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel
1988Ergative, Passive, and Antipassive in Nez Perce: A Discourse Perspective. Passive and Voice ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 547–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, or None of the Above? Subject and Topic ed. by Charles N. Li, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Fe T. Otanes
1982Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Janic, Oneg Ben Dror & Darja Dermaku-Appelganz
2021Typology of Coding Patterns and Frequency Effects of Antipassives. Studies in Language 1–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spreng, Bettina
2005Third Person Arguments in Inuktitut. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Structure and Constituency of the Languages of the Americas 10, vol. 17, ed. by Solveiga Armoskaite & James J. Thompson, 215–225. Vancouver, BC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
2006Events in Inuktitut: Voice Alternations and Viewpoint Aspect. 41st Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by R. L. Edwards, P. J. Midtlyng, C. L. Sprague & K. G. Stensrud, 473–489. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2010On the Conditions for Antipassives. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:7.556–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Viewpoint Aspect in Inuktitut: The Syntax and Semantics of Antipassives. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
1998Ergativity, Transitivity, and Clitic Coreference in Four Western Austronesian languages. Case, Typology, and Grammar: In Honor of Barry J. Blake ed. by Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song, 277–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Nozomi
2016An Asymmetry in the Acquisition of Tagalog Relative Clauses. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter
1982Local and General Markedness. Language 58.832–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin
2017Alignment and Orientation in Kartvelian (South Caucasian). The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity ed. by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis, 1–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vigus, Meagan
2018Antipassive Constructions: Correlations of Form and Function across Languages. Linguistic Typology 22:3.339–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Dennis
1994Discourse-Based Evidence for an Ergative Analysis of Cebuano. UTA Working Papers in Linguistics 1.127–140.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R.
1982Marked and Unmarked: A Choice between Unequals. Semiotica 38.299–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wouk, Fay
1984Scalar Transitivity and Trigger Choice in Toba Batak. Studies in the Structure of Tobak Batak, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5.195–219.Google Scholar
[ p. 340 ]
1986Transitivity in Batak and Tagalog. Studies in Language 10:2.391–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Michelle
2018Dimensions of Ergativity in Inuit: Theory and Microvariation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Stacy F. Teng
2016Reassessing the Position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa among the Formosan Languages. Oceanic Linguistics 55:1.163–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018The Diachrony of Morphosyntactic Alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9.1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
2019Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar