Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (2022) ► pp.167–193

The Neogrammarian hypothesis and pandemic irregularity

Take two

 | University of Hawai’i
At least three types of sound change (prenasalization of obstruents, lenition of obstruents, conversion of labial consonants to the corresponding labiovelars) are widespread in the Austronesian language family as sporadic innovations. What marks these off as different from more familiar types of irregularity is their repeated occurrence across hundreds of related languages, a phenomenon that can conveniently be called “pandemic irregularity.” All attempts to find an explanation for why pandemic irregularities occur in terms of possibly unrecognized affixation, conditioning, borrowing, or unfinished processes, have proven futile. In particular, it is stressed that pandemic irregularity in sound change is fundamentally different from “lexical diffusion”, and deserves to be recognized in its own right as a process that works against the general application of the regularity hypothesis.
Keywords: sound change, the Neogrammarian hypothesis, recurrent irregularity, Austronesian languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Neogrammarian regularity hypothesis
    • 2.1Regularity and exceptions in sound change
  • 3.The evidence for pandemic irregularity
    • 3.1Dempwolff’s “facultative nasal”
      • 3.1.1The facultative nasal as a product of affixation
      • 3.1.2The facultative nasal as a product of conditioned sound change
      • 3.1.3The facultative nasal as a product of borrowing
      • 3.1.4The facultative nasal as a sound change in progress
      • 3.1.5Doubleting
      • 3.1.6Sporadic denasalization
    • 3.2The tripartite split of obstruents in Oceanic languages
    • 3.3Convergence vs. inheritance
    • 3.4Sporadic labiovelars in Oceanic languages
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20027.blu
References (24)
References
Adelaar, K. Alexander. 1992. Proto-Malayic: The Reconstruction of its Morphology and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL C-119).Google Scholar
Bender, Byron W., Ward H. Goodenough, Frederick H. Jackson, Jeffrey C. Marck, Kenneth L. Rehg, Ho-min Sohn, Stephen Trussel & Judith W. Wang. 2003. Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions – 1. Oceanic Linguistics 421.1–110.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 1981. Some remarks on labiovelar correspondences in Oceanic languages. Studies in Pacific Languages and Cultures in Honour of Bruce Biggs ed. by Jim Hollyman & Andrew Pawley, 229–253. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Neogrammarian hypothesis and pandemic irregularity. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 135–156. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013 [2009]. The Austronesian Languages. 2nd ed. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access Monographs. [URL]
. 2020. The resurrection of Proto-Philippines. Oceanic Linguistics 581.153–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert, and Stephen Trussel. 2020. Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. ([URL]).
Dempwolff, Otto. 1920. Die Lautentsprechungen der indonesischen Lippenlaute in einigen anderen austronesischen Südseesprachen. Habilitationsschrift at the University of Hamburg. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen Sprachen, Supplement 2. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
. 1934–1938. 31 vols. Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, Supplement 1. Induktiver Aufbau einer indonesischen Ursprache (1934), Supplement 2. Deduktive Anwendung des Urindonesischen auf austronesische Einzelsprachen (1937), Supplement 3. Austronesisches Wörterverzeichnis (1938). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
. 1938. Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen Sprachen. Supplement 3. Austronesisches Wörterverzeichnis. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark & Malcolm Ross (eds.). 1996. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyen, Isidore. 1963. Why phonetic change is regular. Language 391.631–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gensler, Orin. 1999. Review of Durie & Ross. Journal of Linguistics 351.608–617.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1965. Sound change. Language 411.185–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry. 1950. The principal step in comparative grammar. Language 261. 357–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Review of Durie & Ross. Diachronica 161.165–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John. 2002. The Proto-Oceanic labiovelars: Some new observations. Oceanic Linguistics 411.310–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1996. The comparative method as heuristic. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 39–71. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A. 1982. The demise of Proto-Philippines. Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics ed. by Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & S. A. Wurm, vol. 21.201–216. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL C-75).Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian Languages of Western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL C-98).Google Scholar
. 1990. Proto-Oceanic consonant grade and Milke’s *nj. VICAL-I: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics ed. by Ray Harlow & Robin Hooper, Part II1, 433–495. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley, and Meredith Osmond (eds.). 2011. The Lexicon of Proto Oceanic, The Culture and Environment of Ancestral Oceanic Society, 4: Animals. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL 621).Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. Über die Lautgesetze: gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Oppenheim.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1969. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 451.9–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar