Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 14:1 (2024) ► pp.31–57

Different functions of ‘rā’ in New Persian

A semantic map analysis

ORCID logo | Bu-Ali Sina University
| Bu-Ali Sina University

Persian has a polyfunctional case marker, ‘rā’, which diachronically varies greatly in the range of functions it covers. In this paper, we give an account of different case functions of ‘rā’, in New Persian, an era from the 8th century (C.E.) to present. To analyze the functionality of ‘rā’ in different texts, we selected 78 books from the New and Contemporary Persian eras and studied one thousand tokens of ‘rā’ from each century. The data show that ‘rā’ has been a polyfunctional case marker in New Persian, marking about 13 different case roles. Its main role was to mark direct objects, and gradually it has become its sole function in Contemporary Persian. However, during the time span, some of the ‘rā’-marked roles remained constant and some of them replaced ‘rā’ with other adpositions. We follow a historical semantic map approach as a typological grid to examine our data. The findings show that ‘rā’ has shifted from animate to inanimate concepts gradually. While in the 12th century about 750 out of 1000 (about 75%) roles marked with ‘rā’ were animate, it has decreased to about 400 out of 1000 (about 42%) in the 19th century and less than 30% in the 20th century. Our data show that ‘rā’ has not gone further to mark inanimate relations, and it has gone toward core case roles, specifically direct object.

Keywords: case role, semantic map, unidirectionality, grammaticalization, New Persian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.‘rā’ functions in New Persian
  • 4.Grammaticalization of ‘rā’
  • 5.Summary
  • Note
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21056.ras
References
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1982 The ‘Perfect’ as a Universal and as a Language-Particular Category. Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics & Pragmatics ed. by Paul J. Hopper, 227–264. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology ed. by Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir, Plungian A.
1998 Modality’s Semantic Map. Linguistic Typology 2:1.79–124.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1985 Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Typology and Universals. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Keith T. Poole
2008 Inferring Universals from Grammatical Variation: Multidimensional Scaling for Typological Analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34:1.1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2007 Building Semantic Maps: The Case of Person Marking. New Challenges in Typology ed. by Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli, 225–248. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad
1992 On the (In)dependence of Syntax and Pragmatics: Evidence from the Postposition ‘rā’ in Persian”. Cooperating with Written Texts: The Pragmatic and Comprehension of Written Texts ed. by Dieter Stein, 549–573. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Stephane Polis
2018 The Semantic Map Model: State of the Art and Future Avenues for Linguistic Research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:2.1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey
2018 Grammaticalization and Inflectionalization in Iranian. Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 57–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey & Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
2022 HamBam: The Hamedan-Bamberg Corpus of Contemporary Spoken Persian. Online: [URL]
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2003 The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-Linguistic Comparison. The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2 ed. by Michael Tomasello, 211–242. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2009 Grammaticalization of Cases. The Oxford Handbook of Case ed. by Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, 458–469. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jügel, Thomas
2015 Die Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion im Alt- und Mitteliranischen. Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung zu Kasus, Kongruenz und Satzbau. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 The Development of the Object Marker in Middle Persian. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies − Held on 14–15 September 2015 at the State Hermitage Museum and Institute of Oriental Manuscripts, Russian Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg. Vol I: Studies on Pre-Islamic Iran and Historical Linguistics ed. by Pavel B. Lurje, 203–219. St. Petersburg: State Hermitage Publishers.Google Scholar
Karimi, Simin
1989 Aspects of Persian Syntax: Specificity and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral Thesis, University of Washington.
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Andrej Malchukov
2009 Varieties of Accusative. The Oxford Handbook of Case ed. by Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, 549–561. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, Silke
2010 Beyond Recipients: Towards a Typology of Dative Uses. Doctoral Thesis, the University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Lazard, Gilbert
1957 Grammaire du persan contemporain. Translated into Persian by Mahasti Bahreini (2018) Tehran: Hermes Publications.Google Scholar
1963 La langue des plus anciens monuments de la prose persane. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1970 Etude quantitative de l’évolution d’un morphème: la postposition ra en persan. Mélanges MARCEL Cohen ed. by David Cohen, 381–388. The Hauge: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1982 [1995] Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch, Vol.1. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. (Reprinted by LINCOM Europa, München 1995).Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2001 Syncretism and the Classification of Semantic Roles. STUF -Language Typology and Universals 54:1.35–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Plotting Diachronic Semantic Maps: The Role of Metaphor. Perspectives on Semantic Roles ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog, 99–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 The Dative of Agent in Indo-European Languages. STUF -Language Typology and Universals 69:1.15–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Heiko Narrog
2009 Case Polysemy. The Oxford Handbook of Case, ed. by Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, 518–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohammadirad, Masoud
2020 Predicative Possession in Western Iranian Languages. Folia Linguistica 54:3.497–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohammadirad, Masoud & Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
2017 Instrumental Semantic Map in Western Iranian Languages. STUF-Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 70:4.579–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Functions of the Dative: An Iranian Perspective. STUF-Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 71:4.539–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Næss, Ǻshild
2009 Varieties of Dative. The Oxford Handbook of Case ed. by Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, 572–580. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naghzguy-Kohan, Mehrdad & Tania Kuteva
2016 On Competition and Blocking in Inflectional Morphology: Evidence from the Domain of Number in Persian. Folia Linguistica 50:1.65–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Najafi, Abolhasan
1999 Farhange Fārsiye Āmiāne. Tehran: Niloofar.Google Scholar
2010 A Diachronic Dimension in Maps of Case Functions. Linguistic Discovery 8:1.233–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The Grammaticalization Chain of Case Functions: Extension and Reanalysis of Case Marking vs. Universals of Grammaticalization. Perspectives on Semantic Roles ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog, 69–98. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Shinya Ito
2007 Reconstructing Semantic Maps: The Comitative-Instrumental Area. STUF: Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60:4.273–292.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Johan van der Auwera
2011 Grammaticalization and Semantic Maps. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 318–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Ludwig
2008 Some Remarks on Persian Suffix -râ as a General and Historical Issue. Aspects of Iranian Linguistics, ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Donald Stilo, 329–337. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2018 Persian. The Language and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective, ed. by Geoffrey Haig & Geoffrey Khan, 569–624. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kataba
2007 Crosslinguistic Grammaticalization Patterns of Allative. Linguistic Typology 11:3.451–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samvelian, Pollet
2018 Specific Features of Persian Syntax: The Ezafe Construction, Differential Object Marking, and Complex Predicates. The Oxford Handbook of Persian Linguistics ed. Anushe Sedighi & Pune Shabani-Jadidi, 226–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald
2009 Case in Iranian: From Reduction and Loss to Innovation and Renewal. The Oxford Handbook of Case, ed. by Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, 700–715. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot & John R. Perry
2009 Persian and Tajik. The Iranian languages ed. by Gernot Windfuhr, 416–544. London: Routledge.Google Scholar