Article published in:
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its DevelopmentGuest-edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 3:1] 2013
► pp. 7–27
Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European categories
The reflexive and the middle in Hittite and in the Proto-language
Alfredo Rizza | University of Würzburg
Paola Cotticelli Kurras | University of Verona
Starting from the analysis of constructions employed to express the category of reflexive in Hittite, encoded both by the verbal ending set of the middle and by the pronominal marker -za with both active and middle verbal forms, we present a typological parallelism with the Baltic languages that has consistently developed, from a pronominal, a verbal strategy to mark reflexivity. It is also shown that a development regarding the ways of encoding reflexivity involve other Indo-European languages as well.
The Anatolian languages attest the reflexes of the original set of endings referring to the semantic categories of Reflexive, Middle and “Resultative”, while the other Indo-European languages attest an innovated “mixed morphology” for the category of Middle and Reflexive as opposed to the proper endings of the historical perfect. Within such a theoretical framework, the development of alternative strategies, using pronominal devices or particles, aims to disambiguate a wide polysemous ending set. A ‘Wackernagel’ (2P) particle in Hittite, namely -z, is particularly active in disambiguating reflexivity. Lithuanian -si, an original pronoun that developed at first into a 2P particle and subsequently into a verbal suffix, extends its functional field and takes over the place of the original middle, as in other Baltic and Slavonic languages.
Keywords: Hittite particle -za, middle, Proto-Indo-European verbal system, Baltic suffix -si, reflexive category
Published online: 02 August 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.1.02cot
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.1.02cot
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Benedetti, Marina
Yates, Anthony D. & John Gluckman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.