Understanding diachronic change in Cappadocian Greek
The dialectological perspective
This article challenges the widely held view that a series of pervasive diachronic innovations in Cappadocian Greek owe their development to language contact with Turkish. Placing particular emphasis on its genealogical relationships with the other dialects of Asia Minor, the claim is that language change in Cappadocian is best understood when considered within a larger dialectological context. Examining the limited use of the definite article as a case in point and in comparison with parallel developments attested in Pontic and Silliot Greek, it is shown in detail that the surface similarity of the outcomes of Cappadocian innovations to their Turkish structural equivalents represents the final stages in long series of language-internal developments whose origins predate the intensification of Cappadocian–Turkish contact. The article thus offers an alternative to contact-oriented approaches and calls for a revision of accepted views on the language-internal and -external dynamics that shaped Cappadocian into its modern form.
Keywords: Cappadocian, Asia Minor Greek (Pontic), dialectology, Turkish, language contact
Published online: 31 January 2014
Cited by other publications
Bond, Oliver, Helen Sims‐Williams & Matthew Baerman
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Petros Karatsareas
Karatsareas, Petros & Thanasis Georgakopoulos
Revithiadou, Anthi, Vassilios Spyropoulos & Giorgos Markopoulos
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.