Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.232–255

The evolution of the Persian aspecto-modal suffix -ē, between the 10th and the 16th centuries

| UMR Mondes Iranien et Indien, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

In New Persian, the aspecto-modal suffix -ē is a marker of counterfactuality and past habitual. It was frequently used in texts between the 10th and 16th centuries and did not disappear until the 18th century (earlier in some regions, depending on the dialect). However, in texts of the 15th century, -ē began to be replaced by the prefix mē-, which marks the concomitance, the present habitual, the frequentative-distributive and the continuative perfective. This article demonstrates that this replacement is not only morphological but that it also has a consequence for the reorganization of the aspectual and modal markings in New Persian: the replacement of -ē by mē- in all occurrences progressively leads to a loss of the marker’s first value of concomitance; it expresses all presents, concomitant and non-concomitant. The old unmarked present is marginalized and ends up expressing the subjunctive. This evolution is compared to the development described by different scholars about several unrelated languages.

Keywords: aspect, New Persian, counterfactuality, past habitual, mood
Published online: 30 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.03len
References
Axavainī Buxārī, Abū Bakr Rabī‘ b. Ahmad
1344/1965 Kitāb hidāyat al-muta‘allimīn fī al-tibb ed. by Jalāl Matini. Mashhad: Čāpxāne‑ye dānešgāh‑e Mašhad. (Selected pages: 13–112; for the tables: 13–71).Google Scholar
Daštakī Šīrāzī, Amīr Jamāl al-Dīn ‘Atā’ Allāh b. Fazl Allāh Husainī
Rauzat al-ahbāb fī siyar al-nabī wa-’l-āl wa-’l-ashāb. Autograph (?) manuscript preserved in the library Āstān-e Qods-e Razavi of Mashhad (Nr. 4109). (Selected pages: 1a–26a and 298b–324b; for the tables: 1b–12a and 298b–310a).
Gindin, Thamar E
2007 The Early Judaeo-Persian Tafsīrs of Ezekiel. 2 volumes1. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. (Selected pages (analysis and tables): TE1: 1–20 and 130–150; TE2: 170–190 and 195–215).Google Scholar
Grenet, Franz
2003 La geste d’Ardashir fils de Pâbag, Kārnāmag ī Ardaxšēr ī Pābagān. Die: Editions A Die.Google Scholar
Hāfiz-i Abrū
1959 Panj risāla‑i tārīxī ed. by Felix Tauer. Prague: Editions de l’Académie tchécoslovaque des Sciences. (Selected pages: the 68 p. of this edition; for the tables: 5–54).Google Scholar
Haravī, Saif b. Muhammad b. Ya‘qūb
1322/1943 Tārīx-nāma‑i Harāt ed. by Mohammad Zubair Siddiqi. Calcutta: Imperial Library. (Selected pages: 1–57 and 736–786; for the tables: 1–40 and 736–760).Google Scholar
Horn, Paul
1890 Die Denkwürdigkeiten des Šâh Ṭahmâsp I von Persien. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 441.563–649. (Selected pages: the 76 p. of this edition; for the tables: 574–624).Google Scholar
Juvainī, ‘Alā’ al-Dīn ‘Atā Malik
1912–1958 Tārīx‑i jahān-gušā ed. by Mirza Mohammad Qazvini. 3 volumes1. Leiden: Brill/London: Luzac. (Selected pages: 1–50 of the first volume and 222–278 of the third; for the tables: 1–25 and 222–255).Google Scholar
Kābulī, ‘Abdallah
Tazkirat al-tavārīx. Autograph manuscript preserved in al-Beruni Institute for Oriental Studies at the Uzbek Academy of Sciences, Tashkent (Nr. 2093). (Selected pages: 178b–229a; for the tables: 178b–205a).
Khan, Geoffrey
2000 Early Karaite Grammatical Texts. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Text 3 = JP2. (Selected pages (analysis and tables): the 26 p. of this edition). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, David Neil. MacKenzie, David Neil
1968 An Early Jewish–Persian Argument. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 31:2.249–269. = JP1. (Selected pages (analysis and tables): the 20 p. of this edition). This text was reedited in MacKenzie, David Neil 1999 Iranica diversa ed. by Carlo G. Cereti and Ludwig Paul, 315–337. Roma: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qazvīnī, Nūr al-Dīn Muhammad b. Husain b. Abd Allāh b. Pīr Husain b. Šams al-Dīn
Silsila-nāma‑i xwājagān‑i naqšband. Manuscript preserved in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris (Supplément persan 1418). (Selected pages (analysis and tables): the 44 p. of the text).
Shaked, Shaul
1982 Two Judaeo-Iranian Contributions: 1. Iranian Functions in the Book of Esther, 2. Fragments of Two Karaite Commentaries on Daniel in Judaeo-Persian. Irano-Judaica I, Studies Relating to Jewish Contacts with Persian Culture throughout the Ages ed. by Shaul Shaked, 292–322. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute. Fragment B = JP3. (Selected pages (analysis and tables): the 4 p. of this edition).Google Scholar
Tārīx-i Sīstān
1314/1935 ed. by Mohammad Taqi Bahār. Tehran: Xāvar.Google Scholar
Vārid, Muhammad Šafī‘ Tihrānī
1383/2004 Mir’āt‑i vāridāt ed. by Mansur Sefat Gol. Tehran: Markaz‑e našr‑e mirās‑e maktub.Google Scholar
Williams, Alan V
1990 The Pahlavi Rivāyat Accompanying the Dādestān ī Dēnīg. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1951 Prétérit et optatif en indo-européen. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 47:1.11–20.Google Scholar
Brunner, Christopher
1977 A Syntax of Western Middle Iranian. Delmar, New York: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, David
1989 L’aspect Verbal. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 [1976] Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond
2014 Grammatik des Westmitteliranischen (Parthisch und Mittelpersisch). Vienna: Wien Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Jennifer R
2000 Realis and Irrealis: Forms and Concepts of the Grammaticalisation of Reality. Linguistic Typology 4:1.55–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estaji, Azam & Vit Bubenik
2007 On the Development of the Tense/Aspect in Early New and New Persian. Diachronica 24:1.31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farhādi, Abdul Ghafur
1955 Le persan parlé en Afghanistan: grammaire du Kâboli accompagnée d’un recueil de quatrains populaires de la région de Kâbol. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Faršidvard, Xosrow
1352/1973 Tahavvol‑e fe‘l dar zabān‑e fārsi. 2 volumes1. Tehran: Čāp‑e Vahid.Google Scholar
Gharib, Badrolzaman
2005 The Shift of Optative Mood (Formation) to Durative Preterite in Some Iranian Languages. Indogermanica. Festschrift Gert Kligenschmitt ed. by Günter Schweiger, 145–154. Taimering: Schweiger VWT-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gindin, Thamar E
2007 Tafsīr of Ezekiel: Commentary. Unpublished volume.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1994 Irrealis and the Subjunctive. Studies in Language 18:2.265–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henning, Walter Bruno
1943 The Book of the Giants. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 11:1.52–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Judith
Forthcoming. The Construction hamē + Verb in Middle Persian. Turks and Iranians: Interactions in Language and History ed. by Eva A. Csató, Lars Johanson, András Róna-Tas & Bo Utas Wiesbaden Harrassowitz DOI logo
Junge, Friedrich
1973 Zum ‘Yā der Erzählung’ und seiner Funktion bei Neẓamo ’l-Molk. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 1231.74–78.Google Scholar
Kellens, Jean
1985 Le système modal du vieux-perse. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 451.105–125 (= Festgabe für Karl Hoffmann ).Google Scholar
Kozlov, G.I
1959 Glagol’nyj suffiks ē (ī) po tekstam ‘istorii Bejxaki’. Kratkie soobščenija Instituta vostokovedenija 361.61–76.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1963 La langue des plus anciens monuments de la prose persane. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1975 La catégorie de l’éventuel. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Emile Benveniste ed. by Mohammad Djafar Moïnfar, 347–358. Paris: Société de Linguistique de Paris/Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1976 Notes de vieux perse. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 71:1.175–192.Google Scholar
1984 Les modes de la virtualité en moyen-iranien occidental. Middle Iranian Studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium Organized by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven from the 17th to the 20th of May 1982 ed. by Wojciech Skalmowski & Alois Van Tongerloo, 1–13. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1998 L’expression de l’irréel: essai de typologie. Typology of Verbal Categories: Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday ed. by Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater, 237–247. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Aspect, temps, mode de procès. Mélanges David Cohen: études sur le langage, les langues, les dialectes, les littératures, offertes par ses élèves, ses collègues, ses amis présentées à l’occasion de son quatre-vingtième anniversaire ed. by Jérôme Lentin & Antoine Lonnet, 357–369. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
2006a More on Counterfactuality, and on Categories in General. Linguistic Typology 10:1.61–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b Grammaire du persan contemporain, with the collaboration of Yann Richard, Rokhsareh Hechmati & Pollet Samvelian. Tehran: Institut Français de Recherche en Iran - Farhang Mo‘āser.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
2001 [1986] Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Ludwig
2002 A Linguist’s Fresh View on ‘Classical Persian’. Iran. Questions et connaissances. Volume II. Périodes médiévales et modernes: actes du IVe congrès européen des études iraniennes organisé par la Societas Iranologica Europaea. Paris, 6–10 septembre 1999 ed. by Maria Szuppe, 21–34. Paris: Association pour l’Avancement des Etudes Iraniennes/Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Phillott, Douglas Craven
1919 Higher Persian Grammar. Calcutta: The University Press.Google Scholar
Ranjbar, Maryam al-Sādāt
1379/2000 Anvā‘‑e fe‘l dar Tārīx‑e Baihaqī. Isfahan: Māni.Google Scholar
Salemann, Carl
1895–1901 Mittelpersisch. Grundriss der iranischen Philologie, Erster Band I, Abteilung III ed. by Wilhelm Geiger & Ernst Kuhn, 249–332. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Seddiqiyān, Mahindoxt
1383/2004 Vižegihā‑ye nahvi‑e zabān‑e fārsi dar nasr‑e qarn‑e panjom‑o šešom‑e hejri. Tehran: Farhangestān‑e zabān‑o adab‑e fārsi.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods Oktor
1985 Remarks on the Old Persian Verbal System. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 451.211–227 (= Festgabe für Karl Hoffmann ).Google Scholar
1989 Verbal Ideograms and the Imperfect in Middle Persian and Parthian. Etudes irano-aryennes offertes à Gilbert Lazard ed. by Charles-Henri de Fouchécour & Philippe Gignoux, 333–354. Paris: Association pour l’Avancement des Etudes Iraniennes/Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1997 On the Middle Persian Imperfect. Syntaxe des langues indo-iraniennes anciennes. Colloque international. Sitges (Barcelona) 4–5 mai 1993 ed. by Eric Pirart, 161–188. Barcelona: Editorial Ausa.Google Scholar
2009 Middle West Iranian. The Iranian Languages ed. by Gernot Windfuhr, 196–278. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Lidija Pavlovna
1957 O forme tipa gūjamē v jazyke klassiceskoj literatury. Izvestija Akademii Nauk Tadžikskoj SSR 121.67–72.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lenepveu-Hotz, Agnès
2018. Evolution of the subjunctive in New Persian (10th–20th): From disappearance to reappearance . Folia Linguistica 52:s39-s2 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.