Cover not available
Article published In:
The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers
Edited by Silvio Cruschina and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1/2] 2017
► pp. 160–189

On English turn out and Spanish resultar mirative constructions

A case of ongoing grammaticalization?

| University of Santiago de Compostela
This article focuses on the diachronic development of English turn out and Spanish resultar ‘turn out’ mirative constructions. Having undergone processes of semantic generalization over time, both verbs express evidential and, most prominently, mirative nuances in the present-day languages. This study explores the mechanisms that condition the evolution of turn out and resultar from their original meanings as lexical resultative and change-of-state verbs towards their eventual subjectification and grammaticalization as predicates conveying evidential and mirative senses. The present-day mirative constructions take that- and infinitival complement clauses in both languages. The analysis suggested here shows that both verbs exhibit diverging, though closely related, paths and degrees of grammaticalization. Moreover, this study delves into the further development of these predicates as parenthetical expressions. While English parenthetical turns out has already been grammaticalized, Spanish resulta may be on its way to becoming a grammaticalized parenthetical.
Keywords: mirativity, evidentiality, grammaticalization, raising predicates, resultar , turn out
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Evidentiality and mirativity in English and Spanish
  • 3.Present-day mirative turn out and resultar constructions
    • 3.1Mirative turn out constructions
    • 3.2Mirative resultar constructions
  • 4.A diachronic overview of turn out
  • 5.A diachronic overview of resultar
    • 5.1Stage I
    • 5.2Stage II
    • 5.3Stage III
    • 5.4Summary
  • 6.Ongoing grammaticalization of resultar
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Databases and dictionaries
  • References
Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.07ser
References (63)
Databases and dictionaries
CDE: Corpus del español. 2002–2016. Compiled by Mark Davies. Available online at [URL].
CLMET3.0: The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, v. 3.0. Compiled by Hendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller, & Jukka Tyrkkö. Available online at [URL].
COCA: Corpus of Contemporary American English. 2008–2016. Compiled by Mark Davies. Available online at [URL].
COHA: Corpus of Historical American English. 2010–2016. Compiled by Mark Davies. Available online at [URL].
CORDE: Corpus diacrónico del español. Real Academia Española. Available online at [URL].
CORPES: Corpus del español del siglo XXI. Real Academia Española. Available online at [URL].
CREA: Corpus de referencia del español actual. Real Academia Española. Available online at [URL].
EEBOCorp1.0: Early English Books Online Corpus, 1.0.2013. compiled by Peter Petré. Available online at [URL].
OED: Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Available online at [URL].
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012. The Essence of Mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16:3.435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. The Grammar of Knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. The Grammar of Knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon, 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Evidentials: Their Links with Other Grammatical Categories. Linguistic Typology 19:2.239–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, Fernando. 2005. Evidencialidad: La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2007. Complement-Taking Predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31:3.569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 2008. The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brovetto, Claudia. 2002. Spanish Clauses Without Complementizer. Current Issues in Romance languages: Selected papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ann Arbor, 8–11 April 1999 ed. by Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora, & Diana Cresti, 33–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology ed. by Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish (Semi)auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008. On the Grammaticalization and (Inter)subjectivity of Evidential (Semi)auxiliaries in Spanish. Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization ed. by Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso, 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2009. Analyzing Reanalysis. Lingua 119:11.1728–1755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Grammatical Interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth . Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova, eds. 2007. Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 11.33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The Mirative and Evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33:3.369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Still Mirative After All These Years. Linguistic Typology 16:3.529–564.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova, eds. 2010a. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, eds. 2010b. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2015. The Influence of the Grammatical System and Analogy in Processes of Language Change: The case of the auxiliation of have to once again. Studies in Linguistic Variation and Change: From Old to Middle English ed. by Fabienne Toupin & Brian Lowrey, 120–150. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline, Ditte Kimps, Kristin Davidse, Gilles Jacobs, An Van Linden, & Lieselotte Brems. 2016. Mirativity and Rhetorical Structure. Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer, & Arne Lohmann, 125–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Sonja. 2014. From Inferential to Mirative: An interaction-based account of an emerging semantic extension. Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change ed. by Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden, 83–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Jasper Holmes. 2007. A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance. English Language and Linguistics 11:1.1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Fernández, M. Jesús & Ricardo Maldonado. 1998. La perfectividad como fuente de contraexpectativas: resulta que X finalmente Y. Memorias del IV Encuentro de Lingüística en el Noroeste, 61–82. Hermosillo: Universidad Autónoma de Sonora.Google Scholar
Heller, Brooke & Chad Howe. 2008. Raising Parentheticals as Discourse Particles. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 41, 16–19 July 2008. University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Hella Olbertz. 2012. Didn’t You Know? Mirativity Does Exist! Linguistic Typology 16:3.487–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. ‘Mirativity’ Does Not Exist: ḥdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and Other Suspects. Linguistic Typology 16:3.389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization Vol. I1 ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, Chad & Brooke Heller. 2010. Turns Out They Weren’t Much of a Stretch: Variable patterns of structural persistence. Paper presented at 39th New Ways of Analyzing Variation , 4–6 November. University of Texas, San Antonio.
Huddleston, Rodney D., & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2013. The Development of Comment Clauses. The Verb Phrase in English ed. by Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech, & Sean Wallis, 286–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Processibility. Corpus Pragmatics: A handbook ed. by Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann, 117–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotwica, Dorota. 2015. Evidential al parecer: Between the physical and the cognitive meaning in Spanish scientific prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. Journal of Pragmatics 851.155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014. On the Origin of Clausal Parenthetical Constructions: Evidential/epistemic parentheticals with seem and impersonal think . Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker, & Jukka Tuominen, 189–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Evidential/Epistemic Markers of the Type Verb +  Complementizer: Some parallels from English and Romance. New Directions in Grammaticalization Research ed. by Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale, & Richard Waltereit, 93–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana I., Gerda Haßler, & Marta Carretero. 2017. Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbertz, Hella. 2009. Mirativity and Exclamatives in Functional Discourse Grammar: Evidence from Spanish. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 821.66–82.Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2013. Rethinking Mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise. Unpublished manuscript. Available online at [URL].
. 2015. Grammatical Evidentiality and the Unprepared Mind. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2.314–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2012. General Productivity: How become waxed and wax became a copula. Cognitive Linguistics 23:1.27–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Rodríguez, Lola. 2007. El infinitivo no concertado latino en el castellano del siglo XV: propiedades formales. Actes du XXIV Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes (Aberystwyth, 1–6 août 2004) ed. by David A. Trotter, 273–286. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Las construcciones imitativas del Accusativus cum infinitivo: modelos latinos y consecuencias romances. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española 31.117–148.Google Scholar
Pountain, Christopher J. 1998. Learnèd Syntax and the Romance Languages: The ‘accusative and infinitive’ construction with declarative verbs in Castilian. Transactions of the Philological Society 96:2.159–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Serrano-Losada, Mario. Forthcoming. Raising turn out in Late Modern English: The rise of a mirative predicate. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2. DOI logo
Squartini, Mario. 2001. The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language 25:2.297–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1983. More Effects of Successive Cyclic Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 14:3.561–565.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker. 2009. On the Persistence of Grammar in Discourse Formulas: A variationist study of that . Linguistics 47:1.1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65:1.31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Subjectification and the Development of Epistemic Meaning: The case of promise and threaten . Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and comparative perspectives ed. by Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westvik, 185–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Constructions in Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. I think and Other Complement-Taking Mental Predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49:2.295–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

SERRANO-LOSADA, MARIO
2020. Analogy-driven change: the emergence and development of mirativeend upconstructions in American English. English Language and Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.