Article published in:
The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers
Edited by Silvio Cruschina and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1/2] 2017
► pp. 190212


Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2003Evidentiality in Typological Perspective. Studies in Evidentiality ( Typological Studies in Language 54 ) ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon, 33–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asudeh, Ash
2012The Logic of Pronominal Resumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asudeh, Ash & Ida Toivonen
2012Copy Raising and Perception. Natural Language Linguistic Theory 30:2.321–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, eds., 273–312.Google Scholar
Barron, Julia
1997LFG and the History of Raising Verbs. Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference ed. by Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bender, Emily & Dan Flickinger
1999Diachronic Evidence for Extended Argument Structure. Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics ed. by Gosse Bouma, Erhard W. Hinrichs, Geert-Jan M. Kruij, & Richard T. Oehrle, 3–19. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1938General Anthropology. Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Donna Brinton
2010The Linguistic Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. L.
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. L. & Johanna Nichols
eds. 1986Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2015The Expression of Evidentiality and Epistemicity: Cases of grammaticalization in Italian and Sicilian. Probus 27:1.1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-M. Remberger
2008Hearsay and Reported Speech: Evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33.95–116.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18:1.83–101.Google Scholar
2007Raising as Grammaticalization: The case of Germanic SEEM-verbs. Italian Journal of Linguistics 19:1.129–150.Google Scholar
2013The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A typological study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrick & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006Coming to Terms with Subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17.365–392.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
2010Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Jasper Holmes
2007A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance. English Language and Linguistics 11:1.1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1991From V/2 to Subject Clitics: Evidence from Northern Italian. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. II. Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 135–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haßler, Gerda
2002Evidentiality and Reported Speech in Romance Languages. Reported Discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains ( Typological Studies in Language 52 ) ed. by Tom Güldemann & Manfred Von Roncador, 143–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Evidentiality and the Expression of Speaker’s Stance in Romance Languages and German. Discourse Studies 17:2.182–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helle, Philipp
2006A Contrastive Analysis of Perception Verbs in English and German. Munich: GRIN Verlag.Google Scholar
Holierhoek, Christina M. G.
1978Auditory Verbs in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1974–1976 ed. by Wim Zonneveld, 81–101. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine
1990About AgrP. Linguistic Inquiry 21:4.551–576.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok
2014English Copy Raising Constructions: Argument realization and characterization condition. Linguistics 52:1.167–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koring, Loes
2013Seemingly Similar: Subjects and displacement in grammar, processing, and acquisition. Utrecht University PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2009This Construction Looks Like a Copy is Optional. Linguistic Inquiry 40:2.343–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1990Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1.5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
1995Sounds Like ‘Like’. Linguistic Analysis 25:1–2.70–77.Google Scholar
Lesage, Clair, Nalini Ramlakhan, Ida Toivonen, & Chris Wildman
2015The Reliability of Testimony and Perception: Connecting epistemology and linguistic evidentiality. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society ed. by David C. Noelle, Rick Dale, Anne S. Warlaumont, Jeff Yoshimi, Teenie Matlock, Carolyn D. Jennings, & Paul P. Maglio. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje
2009The Copula Cycle. Cyclical Change ed. by Elly van Gelderen, 209–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan
1983Transitive Adjectives: A case of categorial reanalysis. Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles 1 ed. by Frank Heny & Barry Richards, 253–289. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2002Tipping the Scales: The syntax of scalarity in the complement of seem. Syntax 5:3.219–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank. R.
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poortvliet, Marjolein
2016Copy Raising in English, German and Dutch: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28:4.370–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Perception and Predication Copular Evidentials: A synchronic and diachronic study of descriptive perception verbs in Dutch. University of Oxford PhD Thesis.
Potsdam, Eric & Jeffrey T. Runner
2001Richard Returns: Copy raising and its implications. Proceedings of CLS 37.453–468.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica & Nina Hyams
2014The Acquisition of Syntactically Encoded Evidentiality. Language Acquisition 21:2.173–198 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Andy
1971Three Kinds of Physical Perception Verbs. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 16–18, 206–222. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1972Another Look at Flip Perception Verbs. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, & Gloria C. Phares, 303–315. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1974Physical Perception Verbs in English: A study in lexical relatedness. University of California, Los Angeles PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2004Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance. Lingua 114:7.873–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Evidentiality in Interaction: The concessive use of the Italian future between grammar and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 44:15.2116–2128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1996Subjectification and the Development of Epistemic Meaning: The case of promise and threaten . Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and comparative perspectives ed. by Swan Toril & Olaf J. Westvik, 185–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
2001Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Gelderen, Elly
2014Changes in Psych-verbs: A reanalysis of little v. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 13.99–122.Google Scholar
2015The Copula Cycle. Lingue e Linguaggio 14:2.287–301Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1984The Verbs of Perception: A typological study. Explanations for Language Universals ed. by Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie, & Östen Dahl, 123–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001The Verbs of Perception. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Vliegen, Maurice
2011Evidentiality. Dutch ‘seem’ and ‘appear’ verbs: blijken, lijken, schijnen . Linguistics in the Netherlands 28:1.125–137.Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.
2009Auditory Evidentiality in English and German: The case of verbs. Lingua 119:7.1083–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010aEvidentiality, Polysemy, and the Verbs of Perception in English and German. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages ed. by Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova, 249–279. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010bEvidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German. Oxford: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011(Inter)Subjectivity and Evidential Perception Verbs in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 43:1.347–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willet, Thomas. L.
1988A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality. Studies in Language 12.51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar