The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas
The case of Bunan
The epistemic verbal categories “evidentiality” and “egophoricity” play an important role in the verbal systems of many Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas. In the course of the past decades, our synchronic understanding of those grammatical categories has been considerably enhanced by numerous descriptive studies. However, little is still known about the diachronic processes that give rise to evidentiality and egophoricity. The article addresses this gap by discussing evidence from Bunan, a Tibeto-Burman language, for which the development of evidentiality and egophoricity in its past tense system can be reconstructed in detail. It is argued that the evolution of the two categories can be explained by reference to two processes: (i) the reanalysis of a resultative construction as an inferential past tense and (ii) the reanalysis of third person agreement markers as allophoric markers. In addition, it is maintained that the concept of Scalar Quantity Implicature is crucial to account for the evolution of the two categories.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Preliminaries
- 2.1Egophoricity and other epistemic verbal categories
- 2.2The Bunan verbal system
- 2.3The past tense endings
- 3.The evolution of evidentiality in Bunan
- 3.1Preliminaries
- 3.1.1Set A endings
- 3.1.2Set B endings
- 3.1.3Set C endings
- 3.1.4Relative chronology
- 3.2The rise of evidentiality
- 4.The evolution of egophoricity in Bunan
- 4.1Preliminaries
- 4.2The rise of egophoricity
- 5.Summary of the reconstructed processes
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (37)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Atlas, Jay David & Stephen C. Levinson. 1981.
It-clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.
Bickel, Balthasar. 1996. Aspect, Mood, and Time in Belhare: Studies in the semantics-pragmatics interface of a Himalayan language (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 15). Zürich: Universität Zürich.
Creissels, Denis. 2008.
Remarks on So-Called “Conjunct/Disjunct” Systems
. Paper presented at the conference Syntax of the World’s Languages III
, Free University of Berlin, September 25–28. Available online at [URL] (accessed June 22 2016).
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014. A Grammar of Wadu Pumi. Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD thesis.
DeLancey, Scott. 2010. Towards a History of Verb Agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9:1.1–39.
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Linguistic Typology 24:2.379–421.
Francke, August H. 1909. Tabellen der Pronomina und Verba in den drei Sprachen Lahoul’s: Bunan, Manchad und Tinan. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 631.65–97.
Genetti, Carol. 2007. A Grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. Speech Acts ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. 

Grierson, George A., ed. 1909. Linguistic Survey of India: Vol. III, Part I, Tibeto-Burman Family: Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person Markers: Finite egophoric and allophoric verb forms in Newari. Papers in South East Asian Linguistics 7 (Pacific Linguistics A 53), ed. by Stephen A. Wurm, 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
Haller, Felix & Chungda Haller. 2007. Einführung in das moderne Zentraltibetische. Auf Basis des Dialektes von Shigatse / westliches Zentraltibet (Tsang). Unpublished manuscript.
Haller, Felix. 2000. Verbal Categories of Shigatse Tibetan and Themchen Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23:2.175–191.
Hargreaves, David J. 2005. Agency and Intentional Action in Kathmandu Newari. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 51.1–48.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Framework-Free Grammatical Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher. 2015. Four Types of Evidentiality in the Native Languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53:3.479–524. 

Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. University of California, Los Angeles PhD thesis.
Huber, Christian. 2013. Subject and Object Agreement in Shumcho. Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area ed. by Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill, 221–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meaning: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press. 

Palmer, Frank R. 2001 [11986]. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands Evidentiality Area. Linguistic Typology 161.111–167. 

San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd, & Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2015. Evidentiality and Interrogativitiy. Lingua 186/1871.120–143. 

Sharma, Devidatta. 1989. Tribal Languages of Himachal Pradesh, Part I. Delhi: Mittal.
Sharma, Suhnu Ram. 2007. Byangsi Grammar and Vocabulary. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1991. The Rhetorical Use of the Tibetan Ergative. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14:1.93–107.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996. L’ergativité en Tibétain. Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Leuven: Peeters.
Widmer, Manuel. 2015. The Transformation of Verb Agreement into Epistemic Marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective ed. by Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken, & Paul Widmer, 53‒73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Widmer, Manuel. Forthcoming. A Grammar of Bunan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Widmer, Manuel & Fernando Zúñiga. Forthcoming. Egophoricity, involvement, and semantic roles in Tibeto-Burman languages. Open Linguistics.
Willis, Christina M. 2007. A Descriptive Grammar of Darma: An endangered Tibeto-Burman language. Austin: University of Texas PhD thesis.
Zemp, Marius. 2014. A Historical Grammar of the Tibetan Dialect Spoken in Kargil (Purik). University of Bern PhD thesis.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Sandman, Erika & Karolina Grzech
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.