Article published in:
The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers
Edited by Silvio Cruschina and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1/2] 2017
► pp. 245274
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atlas, Jay David & Stephen C. Levinson
1981 It-clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1996Aspect, Mood, and Time in Belhare: Studies in the semantics-pragmatics interface of a Himalayan language (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 15). Zürich: Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008 Remarks on So-Called “Conjunct/Disjunct” Systems . Paper presented at the conference Syntax of the World’s Languages III , Free University of Berlin, September 25–28. Available online at http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-conj​.disj​.pdf (accessed June 22 2016).
Croft, William
2000Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000Egophoricity in Discourse and Syntax. Functions of Language 7:1.37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte
2014A Grammar of Wadu Pumi. Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2010Towards a History of Verb Agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9:1.1–39.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connie
2000Mirativity in Tsafiki. Linguistic Typology 24:2.379–421.Google Scholar
Francke, August H.
1909Tabellen der Pronomina und Verba in den drei Sprachen Lahoul’s: Bunan, Manchad und Tinan. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 63.65–97.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2007A Grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and Conversation. Speech Acts ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A.
ed. 1909Linguistic Survey of India: Vol. III, Part I, Tibeto-Burman Family: Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin
1980Person Markers: Finite egophoric and allophoric verb forms in Newari. Papers in South East Asian Linguistics 7 (Pacific Linguistics A 53), ed. by Stephen A. Wurm, 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Haller, Felix & Chungda Haller
2007Einführung in das moderne Zentraltibetische. Auf Basis des Dialektes von Shigatse / westliches Zentraltibet (Tsang). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Haller, Felix
2000Verbal Categories of Shigatse Tibetan and Themchen Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23:2.175–191.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David J.
2005Agency and Intentional Action in Kathmandu Newari. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 5.1–48.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2008Framework-Free Grammatical Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher
2015Four Types of Evidentiality in the Native Languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53:3.479–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1972On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. University of California, Los Angeles PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Huber, Christian
2013Subject and Object Agreement in Shumcho. Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area ed. by Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill, 221–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000Presumptive Meaning: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
2001 [11986] Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2013Person-Sensitive TAME Marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey ed. by Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop, & Joana Jansen, 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane
2012The New Guinea Highlands Evidentiality Area. Linguistic Typology 16.111–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd, & Elisabeth Norcliffe
2015Evidentiality and Interrogativitiy. Lingua 186/187.120–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devidatta
1989Tribal Languages of Himachal Pradesh, Part I. Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar
Sharma, Suhnu Ram
2007Byangsi Grammar and Vocabulary. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1991The Rhetorical Use of the Tibetan Ergative. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14:1.93–107.Google Scholar
1996L’ergativité en Tibétain. Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla
2014Towards a New Approach to Evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37:2.240–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2015The Transformation of Verb Agreement into Epistemic Marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective ed. by Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken, & Paul Widmer, 53‒73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. A Grammar of Bunan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Widmer, Manuel & Fernando Zúñiga
Forthcoming. Egophoricity, involvement, and semantic roles in Tibeto-Burman languages. Open Linguistics.
Widmer, Manuel & Marius Zemp
2017. The Epistemization of Person Markers in Reported Speech. Studies in Language 41:1.33–75. Crossref
Willis, Christina M.
2007A Descriptive Grammar of Darma: An endangered Tibeto-Burman language. Austin: University of Texas PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Zemp, Marius
2014A Historical Grammar of the Tibetan Dialect Spoken in Kargil (Purik). University of Bern PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2020. Grammaticalized sources of Kurtöp verbal morphology. Studies in Language 44:1  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
Widmer, Manuel
2018. Transitivity markers in West Himalayish. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:1  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.