Discursive (re)construction of “witchcraft” as a community and “witch” as an identity in the eighteenth-century Hungarian witchcraft trial records
This paper provides a qualitative historical (socio)pragmatic analysis of records of three eighteenth-century Hungarian witchcraft trials using a socio-cognitive model of discursive community and identity construction. I aim to describe how the general social and legal context of witchcraft became situated and interpreted in the actual witchcraft trial records from the delegated officials’ perspective. I argue that in the analysed records, the officials did not simply apply a codified definition of “witchcraft”, but they discursively (re)constructed “witchcraft” as a community and “witch” as the defendants’ identity. Thus, from the officials’ perspective, discursive community and identity construction established a relationship between the general context of witchcraft and the actual witchcraft trials. In order to reconstruct this process, I investigate the linguistic constructs by which the delegated officials actively created “witchcraft” and the defendants’ “witch” identity as mental constructs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The general context of witchcraft in the eighteenth-century Hungarian Kingdom
- 2.1The general social context of witchcraft in the eighteenth-century Hungarian Kingdom
- 2.2The general legal context of witchcraft in the eighteenth-century Hungarian Kingdom
- 3.A socio-cognitive model of discursive community and identity construction
- 4.Data and methods
- 5.Discursive (re)construction of “witchcraft” as a community and “witch” as an identity in the three analysed trial records from the delegated officials’ reconstructed perspective
- 5.1The introduction
- 5.2The questions addressed to the witnesses
- 5.3The witness testimonies
- 5.4The judgment
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (35)
Bessenyei, József
(ed.) 1997 A Magyarországi boszorkányság forrásai I. [‘
Sources of the Hungarian Witchcraft I.’]. Budapest: Balassi.
Bucholtz, Mary
1999 “
‘Why be Normal?’: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls”.
Language in Society 29 (2): 203–23.
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
2005 “
Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”.
Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
Coupland, Nikolas
2007 Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Elena Semino
van Dijk, Teun A.
2007 “
Comments on Context and Conversation”. In
Norman Fairclough,
Giuseppina Cortese and
Patrizia Ardizzone (eds),
Contemporary Social Change, 281–316. Bern: Peter Lang Bern.
van Dijk, Teun A.
2012 “
Discourse and Knowledge”. In
James P. Gee and
Michael Handford (eds),
Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 587–603. Routledge. London.
Doty, Kathleen and Risto Hiltunen
2009 “
Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial Records of Salem, 1692”.
Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 458–69.
Dömötör, Tekla
1982 Hungarian Folk Beliefs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Eckert, Penelope and Saly McConnell-Ginet
1995 “
Constructing Meaning, Constructing Selves: Snapshots of Language, Gender and Class from Belten High”. In
Kira Hall and
Mary Bucholtz (eds),
Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, 459–507. London: Routledge.
É. Kiss, Katalin
(ed.) 2014a Magyar generatív történeti mondattan [‘
Hungarian Generative Historical Syntax’]. Budapest: Akadémiai.
É. Kiss, Katalin
(ed.) 2014b The Evolution of Functional Left Peripheries in Hungarian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gecsei, Lajos
1984 Tanúk és vádlottak vallomásai. A Békés vármegyei boszorkányperekből [‘
Witness and Defendant Testimonies. From Békés County Witchcraft Trials’]. Békéscsaba: Békés Megyei Tanács.
Hajdu, Lajos
1985 Bűntett és büntetés Magyarországon a XVIII. század utolsó harmadában [‘
Crime and Punishment in Hungary in the Last Quarter of the Eighteenth Century’]. Budapest: Magvető.
Kiss, Jenő and Ferenc Pusztai
(eds) 2005 Magyar nyelvtörténet [‘
A History of the Hungarian Language’]. Budapest: Osiris.
Klaniczay, Gábor
1986 “
Boszorkányhit, boszorkányvád, boszorkányüldözés a XVI–XVIII. Században” [‘Witchcraft Belief, Accusation of Witchcraft and Witch-Hunt in the 16–18th centuries’].
Ethnographia 97 (2–4): 257–95.
Komáromi, Tünde
2002 “
Hat boszorkány rontásai. Kolozsvár, 1854” [‘Spells of Six Witches. Cluj, 1854’]. In
Töhötöm Árpád Szabó (ed.),
Életutak és életmódok [‘
Life Courses and Lifestyles’], 7–37. Kolozsvár/Cluj-Napoca: Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság.
Koncz Ibolya, Katalin
2005 “
A boszorkánykutatásban megjelenő 15–18. századi történeti érvelések” [‘Historical Arguments in the Research of Witchcraft from the 15–18th century’].
Jogtörténeti tanulmányok 40 (8): 281–99.
Koncz Ibolya, Katalin
2007 A boszorkányüldözés jogtörténeti kérdései a Német-római Birodalomban és a Királyi Magyarországon [‘
Legal History Questions of Witch-Hunt in the Holy Roman Empire and in the Hungarian Kingdom’]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Miskolc: University of Miskolc.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pócs, Éva
1995 “
Malefícium-narratívok – konfliktusok – boszorkánytípusok (Sopron vármegye 1529–1768)” [‘Maleficium Marratives – Conflicts – Witch Types (Sopron county, 1529–1768)’].
Népi kultúra – Népi társadalom [‘
Folk Culture – Folk Society’] 171: 9–66.
R. Várkonyi, Ágnes
1990 “
Közgyógyítás és boszorkányhit” [‘Common Healing and Witchcraft Belief’].
Ethnographia 101 (3–4): 384–437.
Sárosi, Zsófia
2003 “
Historical Sociopragmatics: A New Approach to the Study of the History of Hungarian”.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50 (3–4): 435–56.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2012 “
Generalizing the Apparently Ungeneralizable: Basic Ingredients of a Cognitive – Pragmatic Approach to the Construal of Meaning-in-Context”. In
Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.),
Cognitive Pragmatics, 3–24. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Schram, Ferenc
1970 Magyarországi boszorkányperek 1529–1768. I. [‘
Hungarian Witchcraft Trials 1526–1768. I.’]. Budapest: Akadémiai.
Sinha, Chris
2007 “
Cognitive Linguistics, Psychology and Cognitive Science”. In
Dirk Geeraerts and
Hubert Cuyckens (eds),
The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 1266–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1995 [1986] Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackweil.
Suhr, Carla
2011 Publishing for the Masses: Early Modern English Witchcraft Pamphlets. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Sz. Kristóf, Ildikó
2013 “
Witch-Hunting in Early Modern Hungary”. In
Brian P. Levack (ed.),
The Oxford Handbook of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe and Colonial America, 334–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuggy, David
2007 “
Schematicity”. In
Dirk Geeraerts and
Hubert Cuyckens (eds),
The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 82–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verhagen, Arie
2007 “
Construal and Perspectivization”. In
Dirk Geeraerts and
Hubert Cuyckens (eds),
The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 48–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wenger, Etienne
2000 Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Wang, Yikang & Xinren Chen
2024.
Self-identity construction via self-reference in pre-modern Chinese intellectuals’ letters home: A case study.
Journal of Pragmatics 229
► pp. 93 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.