This introductory paper defines the present state of the art of historical (socio)pragmatics. We single out interactional and social foci as the most important, and we briefly characterise some more narrowly defined perspectives. These involve a politeness-related view that relies on relational practice with dynamic negotiations and the context-based approach to language use in time and space with its situational and cultural constraints. Next, the paper discusses the research questions addressed in this Special Issue. The papers cover diachronic changes in rhetorical and sociocultural modes of communication, whether and how irony and sarcasm can be detected in different historical periods, how metadiscourse reveals politeness strategies and intercultural transfer, what disruptive institutional activity types occur and what their cognitive underpinnings are, how ephemeral texts have been used in social and political conflict, how meaning-making practices work on the macro level of genres, and how literacy skills are reflected in correspondence with a connection to genre models. Overall, this introduction aims to set the scene for current historical (socio)pragmatics. We show its interdisciplinarity and methodologically eclectic research ground, and how it may develop in relation to, and feed into, the neighbouring fields of linguistics and the humanities in general.
2008 “Verbal Aggression and Impoliteness: Related or Synonymous?” In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 181–207. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
1995 “Sounding and Flyting in English Agonistic Insult: Writing Pragmatic History in a Cross-cultural Context”. In Mava Jo Powell (ed.), The Twenty-first LACUS Forum 1994, 600–19. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.
Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard Watts
(eds)2015Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
(eds)2011Understanding Historical (Im)politeness. Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2).
2013 “Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-register”. Journal of English Linguistics 41 (2): 104–34.
Blommaert, Jan
2005Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burckhardt, Jacob
1990 [1878]The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. London: Penguin Classics.
Burke, Peter
2004Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, Ruth, Matti Peikola, Hanna Salmi, Mari-Liisa Varila, Janne Skaffari and Risto Hiltunen
2013 “Pragmatics on the Page: Visual Text in Late Medieval English Books”. European Journal of English Studies 17 (1): 54–71.
Clover, Carol J.
1980 “The Germanic Context of the Unferð Episode”. Speculum 55 (3): 444–68.
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760
2006Compiled under the Supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
Culpeper, Jonathan
2009 “Historical Sociopragmatics: An Introduction”. In Jonathan Culpeper (ed.), Historical Sociopragmatics. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10 (2): 179–86.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2010 “Historical Sociopragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 69–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Melanie
2016 “ ‘By the Queen’: Collaborative Authorship in Scribal Correspondence of Queen Elizabeth I”. In James Daybell and Andrew Gordon (eds), Women, Letters and the Rhetorics of Gender and Agency in Early Modern Britain, 1540–1690, 36–54 London: Taylor and Francis Group.
Gotti Maurizio and Stefania Maci
2011 “Communicating Attitudes and Values through Language Choices: Diatopic and Diastratic Variation in Mary Magdalene in MS Digby 133”. In Päivi Pahta and Andreas Jucker (eds), Communicating Early English Manuscripts, 55–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grund, Peter J.
2007 “The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials”. Studia Neophilologica 79 (1): 3–24.
Grund, Peter J.
2012 “Textual History as Language History? Text Categories, Corpora, Editions and the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials”. Studia Neophilologica 84 (1): 40–54.
Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary
2009 Edited by Christian Kay, Jane Roberts, Michael Samuels and Irené Wotherspoon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hübler, Axel and Ulrich Busse
2012 “Introduction”. In Axel Hübler and Ulrich Busse (eds), Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Bemjamins.
2012 “Changes in Politeness Cultures”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 422–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Päivi Pahta
2011 “Communicating Manuscripts: Authors, Scribes, Readers, Listeners and Communicating Characters”. In Päivi Pahta and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Communicating Early English Manuscripts, 3–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2010 “Historical (Im)politeness: An Introduction”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (Im)politeness Research, 9–36. Bern: Peter Lang.
2014 “Philology on the Move: Manuscript Studies at the Dawn of the 21st Century”. Studia Neophilologica 86 (1): 1–8.
Kytö, Merja, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker
(eds)2011Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England (Including CD-ROM An Electronic Text Edition of Depositions 1560–1760 (ETED)). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laitinen, Mikko
2015 “Early Nineteenth-Century Pauper Letters”. In Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier and Richard Watts (eds), Letter Writing and Language Change, 185–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2014Creating Digital Editions for Corpus Linguistics: The Case of Potage Dyvers, A Family of Six Middle English Recipe Collections. PhD thesis. University of Helsinki. Available online at: [URL].
Moore, Colette
2011Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pahta, Päivi and Andreas H. Jucker
(eds)2011Communicating Early English Manuscripts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paternoster, Annick and Marcel Bax
2015 “Towards a Diachrony of Relational Work: Factors behind Sociopragmatic Change in 18th and 19th Century Europe”. Discussion panel at IPrA conference. Conveners: Annick Paternoster and Marcel Bax.
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2008Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2011 “The Pragmatics of Punctuation in Older Scots”. In Päivi Pahta and Andreas Jucker (eds), Communicating Early English Manuscripts, 212–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suhr, Carla
2011Publishing for the Masses: Early Modern English Witchcraft Pamphlets. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Thomas, Jenny
1981Pragmatic Failure. Unpublished MA dissertation. University of Lancaster.
Thomas, Jenny
1983 “Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure”. Applied Linguistics 4 (2): 91–112. (Based on MA dissertation 1981 University of Lancaster).
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.