Article published in:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp. 127
Austin, John L.
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Pointing and Placing”. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, 243–68. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike and Bernd Heine
1986 “On the Metaphorical Base of Grammar”. Studies in Language 10 (2): 297–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2009The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “A ‘Composite Utterances’ Approach to Meaning”. In Cornelia Müller, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, Alan Cienki, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), Handbook Body – Language – Communication. Volume 11, 689–706. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga and Anette Rosenbach
2000 “Introduction”. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 1–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fotion, Nicholas
1981 “I’ll bet you $10 that betting is not a speech act”. In Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà and Jef Verschueren (eds), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, 8–14 July 1979, 211–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1489–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, Louis
1990 “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action”. Cognitive Linguistics 1 (3): 323–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991a “From Cognition to Grammar: Evidence from African Languages”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 149–87. (Volume 11.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991bGrammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Michael Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language”. Linguistics 17 (5–6): 365–99.Google Scholar
2004 “Deixis”. In Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, Helmut
1999 “Diachronic Semantics: Towards a Unified Theory of Language Change?” In Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds), Historical Semantics and Cognition, 49–60. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter
2003 “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In René Dirven and Ralf Pörings (eds), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 407–34. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks
1973 “Opening up Closings”. Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Gustaf
1968 [1931]Meaning and Change of Meaning. With Special Reference to the English Language. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Karen
2007 “Metaphoric Extension and Invited Inferencing”. Cultura, lenguaje y representación 51, 255–71.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1991 “English Speech Act Verbs: A Historical Perspective”. In Linda R. Waugh and Stephen Rudy (eds), New Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation, 387–406. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar