Cover not available
Article published In:
Exploring (im)politeness in ancient languages
Edited by Kim Ridealgh
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:2] 2019
► pp. 204–224

When please ceases to be polite

The use of sis in early Latin

 | University of Reading
Latin sis, contracted from si uis (‘if you wish’) and commonly attached to imperatives in early Latin, is usually translated as ‘please’, but some scholars have seen it as urgent rather than polite. Here, an examination of all the examples of sis in early Latin (chiefly Plautus and Terence) demonstrates that it is neither polite nor urgent and indeed has no function in the politeness system at all: its function is as a focus-marking clitic particle. This role was only one-step in the long process of development undergone by sis, from an ‘if you wish’ offering genuine alternatives to ‘please’ (at a time before the earliest surviving evidence), then by weakening to the focus-marking particle (in early Latin) and then to disappearance (in Classical Latin).
Keywords: directive, Latin, please, politeness, request, sis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Group i: Potentially polite
  • 3.Group ii: Rude
  • 4.Group iii: Neither
  • 5.Ironic/sarcastic politeness?
  • 6.Other politeness-system explanations
  • 7.A focus-marking clitic particle
  • 8.Examples of sis excluded from the initial corpus of data
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00029.dic
References (37)
References
Adams, James N. 1984. “Female Speech in Latin Comedy”. Antichthon 181: 43–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994a. Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin. (Supplementary Volume 18.) Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
1994b. “Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Personal Pronouns in Classical Latin”. Transactions of the Philological Society 92 (2): 103–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrios-Lech, Peter. 2016. Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Melo, Wolfgang. 2011–2013. Plautus. (Loeb Classical Library. Five1 Volumes.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 2006. “The Use of Latin sis as a Focus-marking Clitic Particle”. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 111: 21–25.Google Scholar
. 2012. “How to Say ‘Please’ in Classical Latin”. Classical Quarterly 62 (2): 731–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “How to Say ‘Please’ in Post-Classical Latin: Fronto and the Importance of Archaism”. Journal of Latin Linguistics 14 (1): 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Politeness in Ancient Rome: Can it Help us Evaluate Modern Politeness Theories?” Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2): 197–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferri, Rolando. 2008. “Politeness in Latin Comedy: Some Preliminary Thoughts”. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 611: 15–28.Google Scholar
Glare, P. G. W. 1968–1982. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halla-aho, Hilla. 2010. “Requesting in a Letter: Context, Syntax, and the Choice Between Complements in the Letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger”. Transactions of the Philological Society 108 (3): 232–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johann B. 1951. Lateinische Umgangssprache [‘Latin Colloquial Speech’]. (Third edition.) Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Janson, Tore. 1979. Mechanisms of Language Change in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kauer, Robert and Wallace M. Lindsay. 1926. P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Gonzalez. 1926–1933. Lexicon Plautinum II. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Malcovati, Henrica. 1953. Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae [‘Fragments of the Republican Roman Orators’]. Turin: Paravia.Google Scholar
Marx, Friedrich. 1904. C. Lucilii Carminum Reliquiae I [‘Remains of the Poems of C. Lucilius’]. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Müller, Roman. 1997. Sprechen und Sprache: Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz [‘Speaking and Language: Linguistic Studies on the Dialogues of Terence’]. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Núnez, S. 1995. “Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo” [“Material for a Sociology of the Latin Language: Terence and Imperatival Modifiers”]. Florentia Iliberritana: Revista de Estudios de Antigüedad Clásica 61: 347–366.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics. (Translated by H. Mulder.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, William and George G. Ramsay. 1869. The Mostellaria of Plautus. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, Otto. 1898. Comicorum Romanorum Fragmenta. (Third edition.) Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1989. “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals”. In Marius Lavency and Dominique Longrée (eds), Proceedings of the Vth Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 367–378. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roesch, Sophie. 2004. “La politesse dans la correspondance de Cicéron” [“Politeness in Cicero’s Letters”]. In Léon Nadjo and Élisabeth Gavoille (eds), Epistulae antiquae III: Actes du IIIe colloque international “L’Épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens” [‘Ancient Letters III: Proceedings of the third international colloquium “Ancient epistolography and its European descendants”’], 139–152. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Schauer, Markus. 2012. Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta I [‘Fragments of the Roman tragedians I’]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2002. “Politeness and Formulaicity”. Journal of Greek Linguistics 3 (1): 179–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Testing Brown and Levinson’s Theory in a Corpus of Spontaneous Conversational Data from Cypriot Greek”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1681: 119–134.Google Scholar
. 2005. “An Argument for a Frame-based Approach to Politeness: Evidence from the Use of the Imperative in Cypriot Greek”. In Robin Lakoff and Ide Sachiko (eds), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, 99–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness”. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Travers, Pamela L. 1934. Mary Poppins. London: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2009. La petición verbal en latín: Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático [‘Latin Requests: A Lexical, Semantic, and Pragmatic Study’]. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Estrategias de cortesía lingüística en Querolus ” [“Strategies of Linguistic Politeness in Querolus ”]. Latomus 76 (1): 140–161.Google Scholar