This paper proposes a method that is designed to facilitate diachronic speech act analysis. The proposed method
draws on the corpus linguistic concept of local grammar – an approach which seeks to account for, not the whole of a language, but
one meaning or function only. Local grammar descriptions capture both formal and semantic regularities of speech act realisations,
and local grammars offer a more reliable way to quantify speech act realisations across time. It is particularly in this respect
that it is argued that a local grammar approach can be useful for diachronic speech act studies, which is demonstrated
subsequently by tracing one particular speech act, namely “apology”, in a sample of the Corpus of Historical American English
(coha).
Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational Routines in English. London and New York: Longman.
Archer, Dawn. 2010. “Speech Acts”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 379–418. (Volume 81.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bednarek, Monika. 2007. “Local Grammar and Register Variation: Explorations in Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspaper Discourse”. Empirical Language Research 1 (1): 1–20.
Bergner, Heinz. 1992. “The Pragmatics of Medieval Texts”. In Dieter Stein (ed.), The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, 163–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Winnie and Tiffany Ching. 2018. “‘Not a Guarantee of Future Performance’: The Local Grammar of Disclaimers”. Applied Linguistics 39 (3): 263–301.
Davies, Mark. 2012a. “Some Methodological Issues Related to Corpus-based Investigations of Recent Syntactic Changes in English”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 157–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, Mark. 2012b. “Expanding Horizons in Historical Linguistics with the 400-million Words Corpus of Historical American English”. Corpora 7 (2): 121–57.
Deutschmann, Mats. 2003. Apologising in British English. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.) Umeå University, Sweden.
Fitzmaurice, Susan and Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2007. Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garcia, Paula. 2015. “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair. 2000. “A Local Grammar of Evaluation”. In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston, Susan and Hang Su. 2019. “Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’”. Applied Linguistics 40 (4): 567–593.
Jacobsson, Mattias. 2002. “‘Thank You’ and ‘Thanks’ in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal 261: 63–80.
Jucker, Andreas H.2009. “Speech Act Research Between Armchair, Field and Laboratory: The Case of Compliments”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (8): 1611–1635.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2014a. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. “Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2015. “Speech Acts: A Diachronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 52–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vanderveken, Daniel. 2001. “Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory”. In Daniel Vanderveken and Susumu Kubo (eds), Essays in Speech Act Theory, 25–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Yu, Danni, Hang Su & Marina Bondi
2024. Developing local grammars of speech acts in Italian: The case of apology. Lingua 299 ► pp. 103672 ff.
2022. Assessing pragmatic performance in advanced L2 academic writing through the lens of local grammars: A case study of ‘exemplification’. Assessing Writing 54 ► pp. 100668 ff.
Su, Hang & Xiaofei Lu
2023. Local grammars and intercultural speech act studies: A study of apologies in four English varieties. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Meng Huat Chau
2022. Exemplification in Chinese English-major MA students' and expert writers’ academic writing: A local grammar based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 58 ► pp. 101120 ff.
2022. Julia Muschalik: Threatening in English: A mixed method approach. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 120 ff.
Su, Hang & Lei Zhang
2020. Local grammars and discourse acts in academic writing: A case study of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 43 ► pp. 100805 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.