Article published in:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 21:1 (2020) ► pp. 109–136

Local grammars and diachronic speech act analysis

A case study of apology in the history of American English

| Sichuan International Studies University
This paper proposes a method that is designed to facilitate diachronic speech act analysis. The proposed method draws on the corpus linguistic concept of local grammar – an approach which seeks to account for, not the whole of a language, but one meaning or function only. Local grammar descriptions capture both formal and semantic regularities of speech act realisations, and local grammars offer a more reliable way to quantify speech act realisations across time. It is particularly in this respect that it is argued that a local grammar approach can be useful for diachronic speech act studies, which is demonstrated subsequently by tracing one particular speech act, namely “apology”, in a sample of the Corpus of Historical American English (coha).
Keywords: American English, apology, diachronic speech act analysis, local grammar, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Local grammar
  • 3.Corpus and data retrieval
  • 4.A local grammar analysis of apology
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00038.su
References
Aijmer, Karin
1996 Conversational Routines in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn
2010 “Speech Acts”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 379–418. (Volume 81.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barnbrook, Geoff
2002 Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2007 “Local Grammar and Register Variation: Explorations in Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspaper Discourse”. Empirical Language Research 1 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Bella, Spyridoula
2014 “A Contrastive Study of Apologies Performed by Greek Native Speakers and English Learners of Greek as a Foreign Language”. Pragmatics 24 (4): 679–713. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergner, Heinz
1992 “The Pragmatics of Medieval Texts”. In Dieter Stein (ed.), The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, 163–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
(eds) 1989 Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Winnie and Tiffany Ching
2018 “ ‘Not a Guarantee of Future Performance’: The Local Grammar of Disclaimers”. Applied Linguistics 39 (3): 263–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2012a “Some Methodological Issues Related to Corpus-based Investigations of Recent Syntactic Changes in English”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 157–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012b “Expanding Horizons in Historical Linguistics with the 400-million Words Corpus of Historical American English”. Corpora 7 (2): 121–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutschmann, Mats
2003 Apologising in British English. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.) Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan and Irma Taavitsainen
(eds) 2007 Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Paula
2015 “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2002 “Pattern Grammar, Language Teaching, and Linguistic Variation: Applications of a Corpus-Driven Grammar”. In Randi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice and Doug Biber (eds), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, 167–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair
2000 “A Local Grammar of Evaluation”. In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Hang Su
2019 “Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’”. Applied Linguistics 40 (4): 567–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Mattias
2002 “ ‘Thank You’ and ‘Thanks’ in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal 261: 63–80.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
2009 “Speech Act Research Between Armchair, Field and Laboratory: The Case of Compliments”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (8): 1611–1635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
2000 “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2008a Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 229–443. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014a “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “Complimenting in the History of American English: A Metacommunicative Expression Analysis”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 257–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2000 “Explicit Performatives in Old English: A Corpus-Based Study of Directives”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (2): 301–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Tracing Directives Through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act Analysis”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Speech Acts: A Diachronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 52–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptytko, Roman
1995 “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 515–540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Su, Hang
2017 “Local Grammars of Speech Acts: An Exploratory Study”. Journal of Pragmatics 1111: 72–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Thank Bloody God It’s Friday: A Local Grammar of Thanking”. Corpus Pragmatics 2 (1): 83–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Su, Hang and Naixing Wei
2018 “ ‘I’m Really Sorry About What I Said’: A Local Grammar of Apology”. Pragmatics 28 (3): 439–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice
2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
2007 “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Speech Acts Now and Then: Towards a Pragmatic History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel
2001 “Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory”. In Daniel Vanderveken and Susumu Kubo (eds), Essays in Speech Act Theory, 25–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Saleem, Tahir, Uzma Unjum, Munawar Iqbal Ahmed, Ayaz Qadeer & Krisda Chaemsaithong
2021. Social distance and speech behavior: A case of Pakistani English speakers’ apology responses. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 Crossref logo
Saleem, Tahir, Musarat Yasmin, Aisha Saleem & Krisda Chaemsaithong
2021. Linguistic politeness of Pakistani English and British English speakers: Culture and gender perspectives. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 Crossref logo
Su, Hang
2021. Changing patterns of apology in spoken British English. Pragmatics and Society 12:3 ► pp. 410 ff. Crossref logo
Su, Hang
2022. Julia Muschalik: Threatening in English: A mixed method approach. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Su, Hang & Lei Zhang
2020. Local grammars and discourse acts in academic writing: A case study of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 43 ► pp. 100805 ff. Crossref logo
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 120 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.