A case study of apology in the history of American English
Hang Su | Sichuan International Studies University
This paper proposes a method that is designed to facilitate diachronic speech act analysis. The proposed method
draws on the corpus linguistic concept of local grammar – an approach which seeks to account for, not the whole of a language, but
one meaning or function only. Local grammar descriptions capture both formal and semantic regularities of speech act realisations,
and local grammars offer a more reliable way to quantify speech act realisations across time. It is particularly in this respect
that it is argued that a local grammar approach can be useful for diachronic speech act studies, which is demonstrated
subsequently by tracing one particular speech act, namely “apology”, in a sample of the Corpus of Historical American English
(coha).
1992 “The Pragmatics of Medieval Texts”. In Dieter Stein (ed.), The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, 163–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
(eds)1989Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Winnie and Tiffany Ching
2018 “ ‘Not a Guarantee of Future Performance’: The Local Grammar of Disclaimers”. Applied Linguistics 39 (3): 263–301.
Davies, Mark
2012a “Some Methodological Issues Related to Corpus-based Investigations of Recent Syntactic Changes in English”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 157–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, Mark
2012b “Expanding Horizons in Historical Linguistics with the 400-million Words Corpus of Historical American English”. Corpora 7 (2): 121–57.
Deutschmann, Mats
2003Apologising in British English. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.) Umeå University, Sweden.
Fitzmaurice, Susan and Irma Taavitsainen
(eds)2007Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garcia, Paula
2015 “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2007 “Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2015 “Speech Acts: A Diachronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 52–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
2007 “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2022. Julia Muschalik: Threatening in English: A mixed method approach. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Su, Hang & Lei Zhang
2020. Local grammars and discourse acts in academic writing: A case study of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 43 ► pp. 100805 ff.
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 120 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.