Parallels between the negative cycle and the rise of interrogative marking in French
In this paper, I discuss a type of construction that is rarely if ever mentioned in connection with diachronic
cyclicity: wh-interrogative marking. In particular, I shall compare sentential negation with
wh-marking in French and point to interesting commonalities between the prototypical diachronic cycle (negation)
and interrogative marking. The pragmatic contrast between question types in Old French is shown to be mirrored in a similar
contrast in Modern French, with the previously “strong” est-ce que interrogative now being a weaker one. In
addition, I argue that reversal of anaphoric direction is another shared feature in the history of negation and of the
est-ce que interrogative.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Morphosyntactic and semantic–pragmatic cycles
- 1.2Parallels between negation and interrogation
- 1.3The idea of the interrogative cycle
- 2.Marked interrogation in French
- 2.1Interrogative form-types in Modern French
- 2.2On the notion of marked interrogation
- 2.3Marked wh-interrogation in French
- 2.3.1The “echo question” and the “incredulity question”
- 2.3.2Lacking information outside an expected or reasonable range
- 2.3.3Marked and non-marked wh-interrogation in Modern French and Old French
- 3.Use of the long form in Old French
- 4.Reversal of anaphoric direction
- 4.1“Janus-faced” context in the generalization of French bipartite negation
- 4.2Reversal of anaphoric direction in the history of the est-ce que interrogatives
- 5.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (49)
Authier, Jean-Marc
1993 “
Nonquantificational Wh and Weakest Crossover”.
Linguistic Inquiry 24 (1): 161–168.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bailey, Laura
2013 “
Question Particles: Thai, Japanese and English”.
Linguistica Atlantica 321: 34–51.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ball, Rodney
2000 Colloquial French Grammar. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behnstedt, Peter
1973 Viens-tu? Est-ce que tu viens? Tu viens?. Formen und Strukturen des direkten Fragesatzes im Französischen [‘
Do You Come? Forms and Structures of the French Direct Interrogative’]. Tübingen: TBL.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bencini, Giulia
2003 “
Toward a Diachronic Typology of Yes/no Question Constructions with Particles”.
Chicago Linguistic Society 391: 604–621.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birner, Betty
2006 “
Semantic and Pragmatic Contributions to Information Status”.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38 (1): 14–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boucher, Paul
2010 “
L’interrogation partielle en français: l’interface syntaxe / sémantique” [“Wh-questions in French: The Syntax–Semantics Interface”].
Syntaxe et sémantique 111: 55–82.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, Ariel
2007 “
Incredulity Questions”. In
Ron Artstein and
Laure Vieu (eds),
Decalog 2007: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, 133–140
30 May to
1 June 2007 Rovereto, Italy.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coveney, Aidan
1996 Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Bristol: Elm Bank.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen
1979 “
Typology of Sentence Negation”.
Linguistics 17 (1–2): 79–106.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Detges, Ulrich
2003 “
La grammaticalisation des constructions de négation dans une perspective onomasiologique, ou: la déconstruction d’une illusion d’optique” [“Grammaticalisation of Negation Constructions in an Onomasiological Perspective, or: The Deconstruction of an Optical Illusion”]. In
Peter Koch and
Andreas Blank (eds),
Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie [‘
Cognitive Romance Onomasiology and Semasiology’], 213–233. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Detges, Ulrich
2018 “
Strong Pronouns in Modern Spoken French: Cliticization, Constructionalization, Grammaticalization?”.
Linguistics 56 (5): 1059–1098.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
2002 “
Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis. A Semantic–Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar”.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21 (2): 151–195.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
Féry, Caroline
2001 “
Focus and Phrasing in French”. In
Caroline Féry and
Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds),
Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engdahl, Elisabeth
2006 “
Information Packaging in Questions”.
Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 61: 93–111.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie B.
2007 “
The Emergence of Emphatic ne in Conversational Swiss French”.
Journal of French Language Studies 17 (3): 249–275.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foulet, Lucien
1921 “
Comment ont évolué les formes de l’interrogation” [“How Interrogative Forms Have Developed”].
Romania 471: 243–348.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Gelderen, Elly
2011 “
Cyclical Change: An Introduction”. In
Elly van Gelderen (ed.),
Cyclical Change, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greive, Artur
1974 Neufranzösische Formen der Satzfrage im Kontext [‘
Modern French Forms of the Yes/No Question in Context’]. Mainz and Wiesbaden: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grevisse, Maurice
1990 Le bon usage [‘
The Good Usage’]. (Twelfth edition.) Gembloux: Duculot.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagstrom, Paul and Svetlana McCoy
2002 “
Presuppositions, wh-Questions, and Discourse Particles: Russian ze ”. Paper presented at FASl-11.
Hamblin, Charles L.
1973 “
Questions in Montague English”.
Foundations of Language 10 (1): 41–53.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2014 “
Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: Old French ‘ja’ between Latin IAM and Modern French ‘déjà’”. In
Chiara Ghezzi and
Piera Molinelli (eds),
Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Romance, 39–165. (Volume 91.) Oxford: University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2016 The Structure of Modern Standard French: A Student Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2018 “
Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Examples from Romance”. In
Salvador Pons Bordería and
Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds),
Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, Studies in Pragmatics, 51–77. (Volume 181.) Leiden: Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Jacqueline Visconti
2009 “
On the Diachrony of ‘Reinforced’ Negation in French and Italian”. In
Corinne Rossari,
Claudia Ricci and
Adriana Spiridon (eds),
Grammaticalization and Pragmatics, 137–171. Bingley: Emerald.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaiser, Egbert
1980 Strukturen der Frage im Französischen: Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchungen zur direkten Frage im Französischen des 15. Jahrhunderts (1450–1500) [‘
Interrogative Structures in French: Synchronic and Diachronic Research on the Direct Question in 15th Century French (1450–1500)’]. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koch, Peter
1993 “
Le ‘chinook’ roman face à l’empirie. Y a-t-il une conjugaison objective en français, en italien et en espagnol et une conjugaison subjective prédéterminante en français?” [“Romance ‘Chinook’ Put to the Test: Is There Object Agreement in French, Italian, and Spanish, as well as Leftward Subject Agreement in French?”]. In
Gerold Hilty (ed.),
Actes du XXe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, Université de Zurich (6–11 avril 1992) [‘
Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Romance Linguistics and Philology’], 169–190. (Volume 31.) Tübingen/Basel: Francke.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred
2011 “
Questions”. In
Klaus von Heusinger,
Claudia Maienborn and
Paul Portner (eds),
Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1742–1758. (Volume 21.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred
2012 “
Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions”. In
Chungmin Lee,
Ferenc Kiefer and
Manfred Krifka (eds),
Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred
2017 “
Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions”. In
Chungmin Lee,
Ferenc Kiefer and
Manfred Krifka (eds),
Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackenzie, Ian
2018 “
The Case of Special qui ”.
Journal of French Language Studies 28 (1): 21–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Lindsey
2007 WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of their Form and Function. PhD thesis. University of Austin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nilsenová, Marie
2006 Rises and Falls: Studies in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Intonation. Amsterdam: ILLC.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Offord, Malcolm
1976 “
Negation in »Berinus«: A Contribution to the Study of Negation in Fourteenth Century French”.
Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 921: 313–385.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poschmann, Claudia
2015 Echo-Fragen: Vom Satztyp zur Fragebedeutung [‘
Echo Questions: From Sentence Type to Interrogative Meaning’]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reis, Marga
2017 “
On the Analysis of Echo Questions”.
Florida Linguistics Papers 4 (3).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rouquier, Magali
2002 “
Les interrogatives en ‘qui/qu’est-ce qui/que’ en ancien français et en moyen français” [“Qui/qu’est-ce qui/que Interrogatives in Old and in Modern French”].
Cahiers de grammaire 271: 97–120.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seelbach, Dieter
1983 Linguistik und französischer Grammatikunterricht: Eine Einführung für Lehrende und Studierende [‘
Linguistics and French Grammar Teaching: An Introduction for Teachers and for Students’]. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siouffi, Gilles
2012 “
La question en est-ce que: Une histoire de ‘dé-dialogisation’?” [“The est-ce que Interrogative: A History of ‘De-dialogisation’?”]. In
Jacques Bres,
Aleksandra Nowakowska,
Jean-Marc Sarale and
Sophie Sarrazin (eds),
Dialogisme: langue, discours [‘
Dialogism: Language, Discourse’], 47–60. Brussels: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Söll, Ludwig
1971 “
Der neufranzösische direkte Fragesatz in einem Corpus der Kindersprache” [“The Modern French Direct Interrogative in a Children’s Language Corpus”]. In
Eugenio Coseriu and
Wolf-Dieter Stempel (eds),
Sprache und Geschichte. Festschrift für Harri Meier zum 65. Geburtstag [‘
Language and History: A Festschrift for Harri Meier on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday’], 493–506. München: Fink.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesnière, Lucien de
1959 Eléments de syntaxe structural [‘
Elements of Structural Syntax’]. Paris: Klincksieck.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waltereit, Richard
2018 “
Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the est-ce que Question”,
Open Linguistics 41: 56–69.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Dekhissi, Laurie & Aidan Coveney
2021.
Le contexte linguistique des questions rhétoriques conflictuelles et la variation entre pourquoi et qu’est-ce que.
Langue française N° 212:4
► pp. 123 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2021.
Cyclic changes to the negative coordinating conjunction from Latin to Modern French.
Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2
► pp. 223 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
2020.
Introduction.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2
► pp. 165 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.