Article published In:
Historical Pragmatics today: Articles in honour of Andreas H. Jucker
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Jonathan Culpeper
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2] 2021
► pp. 202224
References
Aijmer, Karin
2014 [1996]Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. (Second edition.) London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper
2003 “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics”. In Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
(eds) 1989Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Bryson, Anna
1998From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Vittorio Tantucci
2021 “The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity”. Journal of Pragmatics 1751: 146–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Andrew Hardie, Jane Demmen, Jennifer Hughes and Matt Timperley
2021 “Supporting the Corpus-based Study of Shakespeare’s Language: Enhancing a Corpus of the First Folio”. ICAME Journal 45 (12): 37–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
El-Mahallawi, Basma Mahmoud Mohamed
2018 “The Use of Thanking Expressions and their Intensifiers from Early Modern to Present Day English.” FJHJ (Journal of Arts and Humanities, Minia University) 86 (4): 903–920. [URL]
Fraser, Bruce and William Nolan
1981 “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271: 93–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1964 “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities”. Social Problems 11 (3): 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W.
1960 “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”. American Sociological Review 25 (2): 161–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guazzo, Stefano
1581The ciuile conuersation of M. Steeuen Guazzo written first in Italian, and nowe translated out of French by George Pettie, deuided into foure books […]. London: Richard Watkins.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2007 “The Co-constitution of Politeness Implicature in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 84–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Mattias
2002 “ Thank You and Thanks in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal 261: 63–80.Google Scholar
Jautz, Sabine
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
2012 “ ‘What’s in a Name?’: Names and Terms of Address in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet”. In Sarah Chevalier and Thomas Honegger (eds), Words, Words, Words: Philology and Beyond: Festschrift for Andreas Fischer on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, 77–97. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
2020Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 “Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology”. Language in Society 1 (1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muldrew, Craig
1998The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, Regina
2014 “Scientific Method: Statistical Errors”. Nature News 506 (7487): 150–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Jun
2008 “Linguistic Rituals for Thanking in Japanese: Balancing Obligations”. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2150–2174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Samuel J.
2022 “A Corpus-based Approach to (Im)politeness Metalanguage: A Case Study on Shakespeare’s Plays”. Journal of Pragmatics 1991: 6–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid and Tahmineh Tayebi
2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order”. Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jennifer
2003Rhetoric and Courtliness in Early Modern Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M.
2005 “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Wenying Jiang
2003 “Explaining Cross-cultural Pragmatic Findings: Moving from Politeness Maxims to Sociopragmatic Interactional Principles (SIPs)”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1633–1650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
2020 “Digital Pragmatics in English”. In Svenja Adolphs and Dawn Knight (eds), Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities, 107–124. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio, Jonathan Culpeper and Matteo Cristofaro
2018 “Dynamic Resonance and Social Reciprocity in Language Change: The Case of Good Morrow ”. Language Sciences 681: 6–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, M.
2005 “Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thirsk, Joan
1978Economic Policy and Projects: The Development of a Consumer Culture in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith
2018In Pursuit of Civility: Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2017 “ ‘Insubordination’ in the Light of the Uniformitarian Principle”. English Language & Linguistics 21 (2): 289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werkhofer, Konrad T.
2005 [1992] “Traditional and Modern Views: The Social Constitution and the Power of Politeness”. In Richard J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 155–199. (Second edition.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E.
2010 “Introduction: On the Emergence of Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics”. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari and Kathryn Allan (eds), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 3–27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
02.04.18 (n.) Gratitude
2021 In The Historical Thesaurus of English. (Second edition, Version 5.0.) University of Glasgow. Accessed 19 September 2021 at: [URL]