Cover not available
Article published In:
Historical Pragmatics today: Articles in honour of Andreas H. Jucker
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Jonathan Culpeper
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2] 2021
► pp. 245–262

Medical book reviews 1665–1800

From compliments to insults

| University of Helsinki
This article traces medical book reviews up to 1800 in the first scientific periodical, The Philosophical Transactions (pt 1665–), and the first general magazine, The Gentleman’s Magazine (gm 1665–1922), within the frame of genre theory, focusing on polite and impolite speech acts. pt readers formed a close network of Royal Society members, while gm attracted a large and more heterogeneous readership. The method employed is qualitative discourse analysis in its sociohistorical context.
Two different lines of development emerge. The first issue of pt contains a book review that set a model genre script by surveying the contents and providing a concise positive evaluation at the end. gm published few book reviews at first but their number increased towards 1800. pt keeps to the positive end of evaluation with discreet criticism, while gm speech acts range from praising compliments to aggressive insults. The former trend goes back to book advertisements and the latter to scientific disputes; but in general, polite society conventions prevail in both publications.
Keywords: genre, negotiation of meaning, politeness versus impoliteness, Polite Society, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background and method of assessment
  • 3.Book reviews: Analyses of the genre
    • 3.1The first scientific journal (pt)
    • 3.2Book reviews in Polite Society magazine (gm)
    • 3.3 gm in the 1790s: From creating harmony to verbal aggression
  • 4.Comparing pt and gm book reviews
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpora
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00055.taa
References (46)
Corpora
ememt. Early Modern English Medical Texts. 2010. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Ville Marttila, Martti Mäkinen, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr and Jukka Tyrkkö, with software by Raymond Hickey. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. cd-rom with an accompanying book: Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (eds) Early Modern English Medical Text: Corpus Description and Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
lmemt. Late Modern English Medical Texts. 2019. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen, Turo Hiltunen, Ville Marttila, Päivi Pahta, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr and Jukka Tyrkkö. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. cd-rom with an accompanying book: Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen, Late Modern English Medical Text: Writing Meducine in the Eighteenth Century. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
rsc. The Royal Society Corpus (rsc) 6.0 Open. For more information, see: [URL]
References
Arbuthnot, John (attrib.). 1722. Mr. Maitland’s Account of Inoculating the Small Pox, Vindicated, from Dr. Wagstaffe’s Misrepresentations of the Practice, with Some Remarks on Mr. Massey Sermon. London. (In Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, ecco .)Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael. 2011. Performing Medicine: Medical Culture and Identity in Provincial England, c. 1760–1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Brownlees, Nicholas. 2021a. “‘Just Published’: Advertising Book Instruction, Misfortune, South Sea Affairs, and Entertainment in The Post Boy (1721)’, English Studies 102 (7): 901–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2021b. The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1): 49–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew and Roger French (eds). 1990. The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd. 2010. “Controversies”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 451–481. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furdell, Elizabeth Lane. 2002. Publishing and Medicine in Early Modern England. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany, Douglas Biber and Turo Hiltunen. 2011. “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665–1712) Publications of the Philosophical Transactions and Other Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering Discourse”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (eds), Medical Writing in Early Modern English, 221–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2010. “Attitudes and Concerns in Eighteenth-century English”. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and Change, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2010. “Philosophical Transactions”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (eds), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, 127–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Scientific Periodicals: The Philosophical Transactions and the Edinburgh Medical Journal ”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, 317–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1992. Social Stylistics: Syntactic Variation in British Newspapers. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Early Modern English News Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008. “Historical Pragmatics”. Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (5): 894–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Politeness in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
auf dem Keller, Caren. 2004. Eighteenth-century Newspaper Advertising: A Corpus-based Study of Medical Advertisements and Book Advertisements. Germany: Shaker Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Kreidler, Charles W. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mäkinen, Martti. 2006. Between Herbals et alia: Intertextuality in Medieval English Herbals. (Online. Dissertation.) Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Moessner, Lilo. 2007. “News Filtering Processes in the Philosophical Transactions”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Early English News Discourse, 205–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1985a. “Lay Medical Knowledge in the Eighteenth Century: The Evidence of The Gentleman’s Magazine ”. Medical History 291: 138–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985b. “Laymen, Doctors and Medical Knowledge in the Eighteenth Century: The Evidence of The Gentleman’s Magazine ”. In Roy Porter (ed.), Patients and Pracititoners: Lay Perceptions of Medicine in Pre-Industrial Society, 283–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Henry. 1664. Experimental Philosophy. In three Books: Containing New Experiments, Microscopical, Mercurial, Magnetic. London: T. Roycroft.Google Scholar
Ratia, Maura. 2011. “Texts ‘Con and Pro’: The Early Modern Medical Controversy over Tobacco’. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 821. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1979. Expression of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2019a. “Polite Society Language Practices: Letters to the Editor on Medical Issues in The Gentleman’s Magazine ”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, 129–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019b. “General Periodical: The Gentleman’s Magazine ”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, 327–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “A Medical Debate of ‘Heated Pamphleteering’ in the Early Eighteenth Century”. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English, 141–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Scientific Book Reviews in the Seventeenth Century: Early Stages of the Genre”. In Nicholas Brownlees (ed.), The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, 67–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2008. “‘Methinks You Seem More Beautiful than Ever’: Compliments and Gender in the History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 195–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics: Handbook of Pragmatics, 3–30. (Volume 81.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Peter Jones and Turo Hiltunen. 2019. “Sociohistorical and Cultural Context of Late Modern English Medical Texts”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, 17–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula and Georgios Floros. 2013. “Never Mind the Text Types, Here’s Textual Force: Towards a Pragmatic Reconceptualization of Text Type”. Journal of Pragmatics 45 (1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valle, Ellen. 1999. The Collective Intelligence: The Life Sciences in the Royal Society as a Scientific Discourse Community 1665–1965. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Wild, Wayne. 2006. Medicine-By-Post: The Changing Voice of Illness in Eighteenth-Century British Consultation Letters and Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Whitt, Richard J.
2023. Satire in Eighteenth-Century Medical Discourse: Elizabeth Nihell, Tobias Smollett and the Advent of Man-Midwifery. English Studies 104:8 ► pp. 1363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.