Cover not available
Article published In:
Politeness in and across Historical Europe
Edited by Annick Paternoster, Gudrun Held and Dániel Z. Kádár
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1] 2023
► pp. 143–159

Historical language use in Europe from a contrastive pragmatic perspective

An exploratory case study of letter closings

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics | University of Hamburg
| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics
| Dalian University of Foreign Languages
| Dalian University of Foreign Languages

This paper presents a case study which brings together the fields of contrastive pragmatics and historical pragmatics. Specifically, we contrastively investigate the ways in which the speech act set of “farewell” – representing the closing phase of an interaction – was realised in nineteenth-century historical letters in different linguacultures, including the English, German and Chinese ones. We argue that contrastive pragmatics provides a fruitful contribution to historical research for two inter-related reasons. First, contrastive pragmatics allows us to identify similar pragmatic patterns between typologicially “close” linguacultures, such as the English and the German ones. Second, it prompts researchers to attest the validity of such patterns by comparing such typologically close linguacultures with more distant ones such as the Chinese. Our study is based on a corpus of family letters written to elderly relatives.

Keywords: contrastive pragmatics, family letters, farewell, speech act
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Objectives
    • 1.2Our approach
    • 1.3Previous research
  • 2.Methodology and data
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1The rhetoric of pre-farewell
    • 3.2The formality of pre-farewells and farewells
    • 3.3The performative versus non-performative expression of farewells
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00068.kad
References (42)

Primary sources

Sollors, Werner and Ruth I. Cape
(eds) 2014 New World View: Letters from a German Immigrant Family in Texas (1854–1885). (New Directions in German-American Studies.) Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Henrietta E. Litchfield
(ed.) 2010 Emma Darwin, Wife of Charles Darwin: A Century of Family Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeng Guofan jiashu
曾国藩家书 (‘The Family Letter of Zeng Guofan’) 2008 Beijing Yanshan Edition.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Bax, Marcel
2010 “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness and Ritual Display in Early Modern Dutch Letters”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (ed.), Historical (Im)Politeness, 37–85. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Stamford: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bös, Birte
2007 “What Do You Lacke? What is it You Buy? Early Modern English Service Encounters”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 219–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, Ulla, Ed Nagelhout and William Rozycki
(eds) 2008 Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
(eds) 2012 Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis
1981 Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis and Juliane House
1981 Let’s Talk and Talk About It: An Interactional Grammar of English. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth
1969 “How to Do Things with Words: Performative Utterances among the Limba of Sierra Leone”. Man 4 (4): 537–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2002 The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A Pragmatic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, David
2006 “Irish Emigration and The Art of Letter-Writing”. In Bruce S. Elliott, David A. Gerber and Suzanne M. Sinke (eds), Letters across Borders, 97–106. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
1990 “Politeness Phenomenon in Modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Yingjie and Baogang He
1999 “Reimagining the Chinese Nation: The ‘Zeng Guofan Phenomenon’”. Modern China 25 (2): 142–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendrickx, Iris, Michel Generaux and Rita Marquilhas
2011 “Automatic Pragmatic Text Segmentation of Historical Letters”. In C. Sporleder (ed.), Language Technology for Cultural Heritage: Selected Papers from the LaTeCH Conference Series, 135–153. New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
How, James
2019 Epistolary Spaces: English Letter-Writing from the Foundation of the Post Office to Richardson’s “Clarissa”. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
1996 “Contrastive Discourse Analysis and Misunderstanding: The Case of German and English”. In Marlis Hellinger and Amon Ulrich (eds), Contrastive Sociolinguistics, 345–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Politeness in Germany. Politeness is Germany?” In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds), Politeness in Europe, pp. 13–28. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Communicative Styles in English and German”. European Journal of English Studies 10 (3): 249–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Translation as Communication across Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár
2021 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas
2017 “Speech Acts and Speech Act Sequences: Greetings and Farewells in the History of American English”. Studia Neophilologica 891: 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2010 Historical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Juliane House
2020 “Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Approach”. Pragmatics 30 (1): 142–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held and Annick Paternoster
2023 “Introduction: Politeness in and across Historical Europe”. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24 (1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred
2006 “Abbreviations in Early Modern English Correspondence”. In Marina Dossena and Susan M. Fitzmaurice (eds), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations, 107–128. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
(eds) 2007 Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár
2011 Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Panetta, Clayann Gilliam
(ed.) 2001 Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Redefined. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara
2011 “Honorifics: The Cultural Specificity of a Universal Mechanism in Japanese”. In Dániel Z. Kádár and Sara Mills (eds), Politeness in East Asia, 45–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
1995 Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M.
2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methodological Approach”. In Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Richter, Antje
2013 Letters and Epistolary Culture in Early Medieval China. Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker
2019 “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics 1441: 56–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1988 “Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (1): 55–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaum and Pascale Fung
2013 Building and Using Comparable Corpora. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Dániel Z. Kádár
2016 “The Bases of (Im)Politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate”. East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Matylda Włodarczyk
2021 “Contrastive Pragmatics in a Diachronic Perspective: Insights from Othello ”. Contrastive Pragmatics 2 (2): 168–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held & Annick Paternoster
2023. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.