In this paper we argue that the kind of individualistic ethos Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness model is accused of — and in particular its notion of (non-imposition) negative face — is not simply a reflection of British culture, but a reflection of British culture at a specific point in time. That point is the nineteenth century. Before then, the notion of an individual self separate from society and with its own hidden desires was not fully established. We argue that sociocultural developments, such as secularisation, the rise of Protestantism, social and geographical mobility, and the rise of individualism, created conditions in which the self became part of a new ideology where it was viewed as a property of the individual, and was associated with positive values such as self-help, self-control and self-respect. We also trace the history of conventional indirect requests, specifically can/could you X structures, the most frequent request structures used in British English today and, moreover, emblematic of British negative politeness. We show how such ability-oriented structures developed in the nineteenth century, and propose a tentative explanation as to why ability in particular was their focus.
2024. Linguistic politeness in social networks. Synthese 203:6
Xie, Fang
2024. Politeness Variation: Politeness in Britain, Australia, and Hong Kong. Corpus Pragmatics 8:4 ► pp. 313 ff.
Ackermann, Tanja
2023. Die formale und funktionale Entwicklung vonbitte. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 51:1 ► pp. 152 ff.
Grainger, Karen
2023. Norms and Normativity in Indirectness Across Cultures. In Advancing (Im)politeness Studies [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 33 ff.
Elsweiler, Christine
2022. Gender variation in the requestive behaviour of Early Modern Scottish and English letter-writers? A study of private correspondence. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Elsweiler, Christine
2023. The Influence of French Pragmalinguistic Patterns on the Requestive Style in 16th-Century Scottish Letters. Linguistica 63:1-2 ► pp. 63 ff.
2021. Review. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:1 ► pp. 749 ff.
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2021. Annick Paternoster and Susan Fitzmaurice: Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 299). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 7:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
2020. Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back. Corpus Pragmatics 4:3 ► pp. 259 ff.
Bartali, Valentina
2020. Andreas H. Jucker: Review of “Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day”. Corpus Pragmatics 4:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Jucker, Andreas
2020. Politeness in the History of English,
Ameka, Felix K. & Marina Terkourafi
2019. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics 145 ► pp. 72 ff.
Bella, Spyridoula & Eva Ogiermann
2019. An Intergenerational Perspective on (Im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 15:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll & Claire Hardaker
2019. Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 175 ff.
2017. Performative verbs in requests: evidence from eighteenth-century letters. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 43 ► pp. 233 ff.
Włodarczyk, Matylda & Irma Taavitsainen
2017. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Allan, Keith
2016. A Benchmark for Politeness. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 397 ff.
Locher, Miriam A.
2015. Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics 86 ► pp. 5 ff.
2013. A Cultural Semantic and Ethnopragmatic Analysis of the Russian Praise Words Molodec and Umnica (with Reference to English and Chinese). In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1], ► pp. 249 ff.
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.