Functions of epistolary formulae in Dutch letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
Wray (2002) distinguishes three main functions of formulaic language relating to processing, interaction and discourse marking. In this paper, we show that Wray’s analysis of the functions of formulaic language also applies to historical letter-writing in a corpus of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch letters. Discourse is marked with formulae indicating the text type or the text structure. Interaction is covered by intersubjective formulae communicating health, greetings, wishes for renewed contact, as well as Christian-ritual formulae. The processing function is operationalised in terms of literacy and writing experience, assuming that the use of prefabricated formulae reduces the writing effort. Therefore, we expect less-experienced letter-writers to use more formulae than more-experienced writers. We will show that less-experienced writers are indeed more likely to use epistolary formulae, and conclude that Wray’s “reduction of the speaker’s processing effort” in online speech production, also applies to written seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch.
Keywords: formulaic language, epistolary formulae, letter-writing, historical sociolinguistics, literacy, Dutch, writing experience
Published online: 02 July 2012
Cited by 9 other publications
No author info given
Laitinen, Mikko & Anita Auer
Nobels, Judith & Gijsbert Rutten
van der Wal, Marijke & Gijsbert Rutten
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.