Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp.1–35

Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics

| Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
| Universidad de La Laguna

This paper deals with authorial stance in prefatory material of Early Modern English manuals on women’s diseases. Publications on this field from between 1612 and 1699 constitute our corpus of study. Original digitalised texts have been analysed manually to identify and detect structures concerning authorial identity and stance, according to the model developed by Marín-Arrese (2009). This model for the identification of effective and epistemic stance strategies enables us to describe both the relationship between the authors and their texts and, more specifically, the power relationship between the writers and their audience. One of the most important conclusions of this study concerns the strategic use of stance markers to enhance the quality of these books and make them appropriate for a wide variety of readers.

Keywords: effective stance, obstetrics, seventeenth century, epistemic stance, modality, evidentiality
Published online: 28 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.1.01alo
References
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
2009 “Stance Expressions in Middle English Medical Charms.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 45 (1): 13–29. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2012 “An Analysis of Hedging in Eighteenth Century English Astronomy Texts.” In Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’. The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900 , ed. by Isabel Moskowich, and Begoña Crespo, 199–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2004 “Historical Patterns for the Grammatical Marking of Stance: A Cross-Register Comparison.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 51: 107–135. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen
1998 “Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect.” Text 91: 93–125.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boucé, Paul
1982  Sexuality in Eighteeth-Century Britain . Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978  Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Suzanne Fleischmann
1995  Modality in Grammar and Discourse . (Typological Studies in Language 32.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Claude Moore Health Science Library
2009 “English physician by Nicholas Culpeper”. Available at: [URL] (accessed 21 January 2011).
Coates, Jennifer
1983  The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries . London and Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009  Modals and Quasi-Modals . Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2009 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality. On the Close Relationship between Two Different Categories.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 44–62. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Crompton, Peter
1997 “Hedging in Academic Writing: Some Theoretical Aspects.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (4): 271–289. DOI logo.Google Scholar
1998 “Identifying Hedges: Definitions or Divination.” English for Specific Purposes 17 (3): 303–313. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Dawn Archer
2008 “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts.” In Speech Acts in the History of English , ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 45–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lloyd
1998  Sexuality and Gender in the English Renaissance: An Annotated Edition of Contemporary Documents . (Garland Studies in the Renaissance 9.) London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunn, Peter M.
1999 “The Chamberlen Family (1560-1728) and Obstetric Forceps.” Perinatal Lessons from the Past. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 811, 232–235. Available at: www.archdischild.com (accessed 22 January 2011) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Louise Bourgeois (1563-1636): Royal Midwife of France.” Perinatal Lessons from the Past. Archives of Disease in Childhood 221, 185–187. Available at: [URL] (accessed 17 November 2008).
EMEMT
2010  Early Modern English Medical Texts CD-Rom, compiled by Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Makinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkko, and software by Raymond Hickey. Published with a book Early Modern English Medical Texts. Corpus Description and Studies ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
2007  Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evenden, Doreen
2000  The Midwives of Seventeenth Century London . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1990  Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction . Volume 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
2011 “Broadening Shared Knowledge within the Specialized Community in the 17th Century.” In Diachronic English for Specific Purposes . Special issue of Revista de Lenguas para Fines específicos 171: 121–145. Ed. by Francisco Alonso-Almeida, and Sandra Marrero-Morales.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany, Douglas Biber
and Turo Hiltunen 2011 “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665-1712) Publications of The Philosophical Transactions and Other Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering Discourse.” In Medical Writing in Early Modern English , ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 221–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1970 “Functional Diversity in Language as Seen from a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English.” Foundations of Language 61: 322–361.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru
2008 “The Grammaticalization of Nominalizers in Japanese and Korean: A Contrastive Study.” In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives . (Typological Studies in Language 76), ed. by María José López-Couso, and Elena Seoane, 169–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoye, Louis
1997  Adverbs and Modality in English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1984  Introduction to the Grammar of English . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1994 “Evaluation and Organization in a Sample of Written Academic Discourse.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis , ed. by Malcom Coulthard, 191–218. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
2000  Evaluation in Text . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996 “Talking to the Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles.” Written Communication 13 (2): 251–281. DOI logo.Google Scholar
1998  Hedging in Scientific Research Articles . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2009 “Epistemic Modality in English Popular Scientific Texts and their German Translations.” Trans-kom 2 (1): 26–41.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. W.
1991  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar . Volume II1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “Control and the Mind/Body Duality: Knowing vs. Effecting.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Action. From Theory to Application and Back , ed. by Elzbieta Tabakowska, Michal Choinski, and Lukasz Wiraszka, 165–207. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana
2004 “Evidential and Epistemic Qualifications in the Discourse of Fact and Opinion: A Comparable Corpus Study.” In Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality , ed. by Juana I. Marín Arrese, 153–184. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
2009 “Effective vs. Epistemic Stance, and Subjectivity/Intersubjectivity in Political Discourse. A Case Study.” In Studies on English Modality. In Honour of Frank R. Palmer . (Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication 111), ed. by Anastasios Tsangalidis, and Roberta Facchinetti, 23–52. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mele-Marrero, Margarita
2011 “Self-Mentioning: Authority, Authorship or Self-Promotion in 17thC Prefaces to Manuals on Obstetrics?” In Diachronic English for Specific Purposes . Special issue of Revista de Lenguas para Fines específicos 171: 147–166. Ed. by Francisco Alonso Almeida, and Sandra Marrero-Morales.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2008 “Introduction”. In Intensifiers . Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 12 (2), 213–219. Ed. by Belén Méndez-Naya. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel, and Begoña Crespo
(eds) 2012  Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’. The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900 . CD-Rom containing A Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy (CETA) , compiled by Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo, Gonzalo Camiña, and Begoña Crespo, and software by Irlab (Information Retrieval Lab, Coruña). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2006  An Introduction to Early Modern English . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001 “Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 383–400. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1996 “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , ed. by Joseph Gumperz, and Stephen Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 1989 “Introduction” In The Pragmatics of Affect . Special issue of Text 9 (1): 1–6. Ed. by Elinor Ochs.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
1990  Mood and Modality . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001  Modality and the English Modals . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Precht, Kristen
2000 “Patterns of Stance in English.” PhD thesis, Northern Arizona University [Retrieved from UMI Microform 9982897].Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Walter
1989  Milestones in Midwifery and the Secret Instrument . San Francisco: Norman Publishing.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise.
1998 “Language Is Not a Physical Object.” English for Specific Purposes 17 (3): 295–303.? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
2000 “Procrustes’ Recipe: Hedging and Positivism.” English for Specific Purposes 19 (2): 175–187. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, and Gerard Defyves
1998 “From the Gentleman’s Courtesy to the Scientist’s Caution: A Diachronic Study of Hedges in Academic Writing (1810-1995).” In Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes , ed. by Inmaculada Fortanet, Santiago Posteguillo, Juan Carlos Palmer, and Juan Francisco Coll, 133–173. Filología: Universitat Jaume I. Collecció Summa. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sanders, Jose, and Walter Spooren
1996 “Subjectivity and Certainty in Epistemic Modality: A Study of Dutch Epistemic Modifiers.” Cognitive Linguistics 7 (3): 241–264. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Spencer, H.
1927 “Wolveridge’s ‘Speculum Matricis’.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 20 (7): 1080–1086. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan, and Sung-Ock Sohn
1998 “Grammaticalization, Aspect and Emotion: The Case of Japanese –te shimau and Korean –a/e pelita.” In Japanese / Korean Linguistics 81, 217–230. Ed. by David Silva. Standford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2001 “Evidentiality and Scientific Though-Styles: English Medical Writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English.” In Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st Cerlis Conference , ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Marina Dossena, 21–52. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Susan Fitzmaurice
2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It.” In Methodological Issues in Historical Pragmatics , ed. by Susan Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thulesius, Olav
1994 “Nicholas Culpeper, Father of English Medicine.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 871: 552–556.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 651: 31–55. DOI logo.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir Plungian
1998 “On Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 21: 79–124. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean Christophe
2001 “Subjective and Objective Modality: Interpersonal and Ideational Functions in the English Modal Auxiliary System.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1505–1528. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco José Álvarez-Gil
2021. Impoliteness in women’s specialised writing in seventeenth-century English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Nila Vázquez
2015. Legitimising linguistic devices in A Cheering Voice from Upper Canada (1834). In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4], ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
2019. Chapter 8. Modal verb categories in CHET. In Writing History in Late Modern English, ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
2021. Chapter 12. Evaluative that structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Mele Marrero, Margarita
2019. Chapter 11. Neither I nor we. In Writing History in Late Modern English, ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez-Gil, Francisco J.
2021. Chapter 13. Authority and deontic modals in Late Modern English. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.