This paper deals with authorial stance in prefatory material of Early Modern English manuals on women’s diseases. Publications on this field from between 1612 and 1699 constitute our corpus of study. Original digitalised texts have been analysed manually to identify and detect structures concerning authorial identity and stance, according to the model developed by Marín-Arrese (2009). This model for the identification of effective and epistemic stance strategies enables us to describe both the relationship between the authors and their texts and, more specifically, the power relationship between the writers and their audience. One of the most important conclusions of this study concerns the strategic use of stance markers to enhance the quality of these books and make them appropriate for a wide variety of readers.
2009 “Stance Expressions in Middle English Medical Charms.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 45 (1): 13–29. .
2012 “An Analysis of Hedging in Eighteenth Century English Astronomy Texts.” In Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’. The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900, ed. by Isabel Moskowich, and Begoña Crespo, 199–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1998Sexuality and Gender in the English Renaissance: An Annotated Edition of Contemporary Documents. (Garland Studies in the Renaissance 9.) London and New York: Routledge.
Dunn, Peter M.
1999 “The Chamberlen Family (1560-1728) and Obstetric Forceps.” Perinatal Lessons from the Past. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 811, 232–235. Available at: www.archdischild.com (accessed 22January 2011)
Dunn, Peter M.
2004 “Louise Bourgeois (1563-1636): Royal Midwife of France.” Perinatal Lessons from the Past. Archives of Disease in Childhood 221, 185–187. Available at: [URL] (accessed 17November 2008).
2010Early Modern English Medical Texts CD-Rom, compiled by Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Makinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkko, and software by Raymond Hickey. Published with a book Early Modern English Medical Texts. Corpus Description and Studies ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2000The Midwives of Seventeenth Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1990Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011 “Broadening Shared Knowledge within the Specialized Community in the 17th Century.” In Diachronic English for Specific Purposes. Special issue of Revista de Lenguas para Fines específicos 171: 121–145. Ed. by Francisco Alonso-Almeida, and Sandra Marrero-Morales.
Gray, Bethany, Douglas Biber
and Turo Hiltunen 2011 “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665-1712) Publications of The Philosophical Transactions and Other Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering Discourse.” In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 221–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
1970 “Functional Diversity in Language as Seen from a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English.” Foundations of Language 61: 322–361.
2009 “Epistemic Modality in English Popular Scientific Texts and their German Translations.” Trans-kom 2 (1): 26–41.
Langacker, Ronald. W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. W.
2010 “Control and the Mind/Body Duality: Knowing vs. Effecting.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Action. From Theory to Application and Back, ed. by Elzbieta Tabakowska, Michal Choinski, and Lukasz Wiraszka, 165–207. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2004 “Evidential and Epistemic Qualifications in the Discourse of Fact and Opinion: A Comparable Corpus Study.” In Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, ed. by Juana I. Marín Arrese, 153–184. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
2009 “Effective vs. Epistemic Stance, and Subjectivity/Intersubjectivity in Political Discourse. A Case Study.” In Studies on English Modality. In Honour of Frank R. Palmer. (Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication 111), ed. by Anastasios Tsangalidis, and Roberta Facchinetti, 23–52. Bern: Peter Lang.
2011 “Self-Mentioning: Authority, Authorship or Self-Promotion in 17thC Prefaces to Manuals on Obstetrics?” In Diachronic English for Specific Purposes. Special issue of Revista de Lenguas para Fines específicos 171: 147–166. Ed. by Francisco Alonso Almeida, and Sandra Marrero-Morales.
2008 “Introduction”. In Intensifiers. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 12 (2), 213–219. Ed. by Belén Méndez-Naya.
Moskowich, Isabel, and Begoña Crespo
(eds) 2012Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’. The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900. CD-Rom containing A Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy (CETA), compiled by Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo, Gonzalo Camiña, and Begoña Crespo, and software by Irlab (Information Retrieval Lab, Coruña). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2006An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2001 “Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 383–400. .
1996 “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by Joseph Gumperz, and Stephen Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(Ed.) 1989 “Introduction” In The Pragmatics of Affect. Special issue of Text 9 (1): 1–6. Ed. by Elinor Ochs.
1990Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2001Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.
2000 “Patterns of Stance in English.” PhD thesis, Northern Arizona University [Retrieved from UMI Microform 9982897].
1989Milestones in Midwifery and the Secret Instrument. San Francisco: Norman Publishing.
1998 “Language Is Not a Physical Object.” English for Specific Purposes 17 (3): 295–303.?
2000 “Procrustes’ Recipe: Hedging and Positivism.” English for Specific Purposes 19 (2): 175–187. .
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, and Gerard Defyves
1998 “From the Gentleman’s Courtesy to the Scientist’s Caution: A Diachronic Study of Hedges in Academic Writing (1810-1995).” In Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes, ed. by Inmaculada Fortanet, Santiago Posteguillo, Juan Carlos Palmer, and Juan Francisco Coll, 133–173. Filología: Universitat Jaume I. Collecció Summa. .
Sanders, Jose, and Walter Spooren
1996 “Subjectivity and Certainty in Epistemic Modality: A Study of Dutch Epistemic Modifiers.” Cognitive Linguistics 7 (3): 241–264. .
1927 “Wolveridge’s ‘Speculum Matricis’.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 20 (7): 1080–1086.
Strauss, Susan, and Sung-Ock Sohn
1998 “Grammaticalization, Aspect and Emotion: The Case of Japanese –te shimau
–a/e pelita.” In Japanese / Korean Linguistics 81, 217–230. Ed. by David Silva. Standford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
2001 “Evidentiality and Scientific Though-Styles: English Medical Writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English.” In Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st
Cerlis Conference, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Marina Dossena, 21–52. Bern: Peter Lang.
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Susan Fitzmaurice
2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It.” In Methodological Issues in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter,
1994 “Nicholas Culpeper, Father of English Medicine.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 871: 552–556.
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 651: 31–55. .
van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir Plungian
1998 “On Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 21: 79–124. .
Verstraete, Jean Christophe
2001 “Subjective and Objective Modality: Interpersonal and Ideational Functions in the English Modal Auxiliary System.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1505–1528. .
Cited by 7 other publications
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco José Álvarez-Gil
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.