Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp.36–61

From clause to pragmatic marker

A study of the development of like-parentheticals in American English

| University of Santiago de Compostela

Propositional attitude predicates, such as English think, guess and seem, occur parenthetically in many languages. In this article we pay attention to a group of propositional attitude predicates which can be labelled epistemic/evidential, namely appear, look, seem and sound, and which, in addition to degree of certainty, also give an indication of the evidential source. In this study we describe the different parentheticals available with these verbs, paying special attention to like-parentheticals (e.g. Going to be a big one, looks like), a development characteristic of American English. Using data from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA, Davies 2010-) and the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA, Davies 2008-), we explore whether these developments can be conceptualised in terms of grammaticalisation and (inter)subjectification. In the structural domain, these parentheticals show fixation, decategorialisation and fusion. In the semantic-pragmatic domain, they show signs of generalisation of meaning and increased (inter)subjectivity.

Keywords: parentheticals, evidentiality, grammaticalisation, (inter)subjectification
Published online: 28 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.1.03lop
References
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2007 “Complement-Taking Predicates. Usage and Linguistic Structure.” Studies in Language 31 (3): 569–606. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996  Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions . Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2008  The Comment Clause in English. Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2010 “Discourse Markers.” In Historical Pragmatics , ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 285–314. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005  Lexicalization and Language Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción.
2004 “Gramaticalización por subjectivización como pres­cindibilidad de la sintaxis [Grammaticalisation through subjectification as dispensability of syntax].” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica [New Journal of Hispanic Philology] LII (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, and Yordanka Kavalova
(eds) 2007  Parentheticals . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Diccionario da Real Academia Galega
[Dictionary of the Royal Academy of Galicia] 1997 1st edition. A Coruña: Real Academia Galega.
Gisborne, Nikolas, and Jasper Holmes
2007 “A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticalization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization , volume 11, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 1–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey Pullum
et al. 2002  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2007 “Spoken Parentheticals in English: A Taxonomy.” In Parentheticals , ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 25–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Explaining Diverging Evidence: The Case of Clause-Initial I Think .” In Converging Evidence. Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research , ed. by Doris Schönefeld, 81–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva
2011 “On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2007 “Epistemic Verbs and Zero Complementizer.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (3): 475–505. DOI logo.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José.
1996 “On the History of Methinks: From Impersonal Construction to Fossilized Expression.” Folia Linguistica Historica 171: 153–169.Google Scholar
2010 “Subjectification and Intersubjectification.” In Historical Pragmatics , ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 127–163. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José, and Belén Méndez-Naya.
2012 “On the Use of As If, As Though and Like in Present-day English Complementation Structures.” Journal of English Linguistics 40 (2): 172–195. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Meehan, Teresa
1991 “It’s Like, ‘What’s Happening in the Evolution of Like?’: A Theory of Grammaticalization.” Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 161: 37–51.Google Scholar
Miglio, Viola G.
2009 “ Tengo por cierto, hera fama que, diziendo que, dizque : Referencias a la realidad en el español de la Colonia [ Tengo por cierto, hera fama que, diziendo que, dizque: References to reality in Colonial Spanish].” In Realidades y Fantasías/Realities and Fantasies – In Memoriam Tim McGovern , ed. by Sara Poot-Herrera, 127–142. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana/UC-Mexicanistas.Google Scholar
2010 “Online Databases and Language Change: The Case of Spanish dizque .” In Proceedings of the American Association of Corpus Linguistics 2008 , ed. by Stephan Gries, Stefanie Wulff, and Mark Davies, 2–28. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1985 “Complementation.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description , volume 21, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OED =
The Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM 1992 2nd edition. Ed. by John A. Simpson, and Edmund S.C. Weiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella
2005 “ Dizque en el español andino ecuatoriano: conservador e innovador [ Dizque in Ecuadorian Andean Spanish].” In Encuentros y Conflictos: Bilingüismo y Contacto de Lenguas [Encounters and conflicts: Bilingualism and language contact], ed. by Hella Olbertz, and Pieter Muysken, 77–94. Madrid and Frankfurt am Main: Iberamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “ Dizque in Mexican Spanish: The Subjectification of Reportative Meaning.” Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 151–172.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna
1999  Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English . (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 55.) Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2001 “The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 349–357. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985  A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne, and Deborah Lange
1991 “The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress.” American Speech 661: 227–279. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2000  Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages . London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
2007  Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization , volume 21, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995 “Subjectification in Grammaticalisation.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives , ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2003 “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change , ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher
2002  Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert
1988 “ Like Is, Like, Focus.” American Speech 631: 234–246. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2006  English: Meaning and Cultur e. Oxford: Oxford University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000 “Grammaticalization versus Lexicalization: Methinks There Is Some Confusion.” In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English , ed. by Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, 355–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Yael
1985 “Parentheticals and Functional Grammar.” In Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar , ed. by A. Machtelt Bolkenstein, Casper de Groot, and J. Lachland Mackenzie, 181–199. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Brook, Marisa
2018. Taking it up a level: Copy-raising and cascaded tiers of morphosyntactic change. Language Variation and Change 30:2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Brook, Marisa
2020.  I feel like and it feels like: Two paths to the emergence of epistemic markers. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 DOI logo
Brook, Marisa
2023.  As if, as though, and like in Canadian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English DOI logo
Hasselgård, Hilde
2023. Seem and Appear and Their Norwegian Verbal Counterparts: A Cross-Register Contrastive Study. English Studies 104:1 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Hasselgård, Hilde
2023. Chapter 2. Impersonal passives in English and Norwegian. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2014. Processibility. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann
2016. Extra-clausal constituents. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
López-Couso, María José
2016. Continuing the dialogue between corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Three case studies. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1 DOI logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014. On the origin of clausal parenthetical constructions: Epistemic/evidential parentheticals withseem
and impersonalthink. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2015. Epistemic/evidential markers of the type verb + complementizer. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2016. From clause to adverb. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Mortelmans, Tanja
2017. Seem-type verbs in Dutch and German. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
MÉLAC, ERIC
2022. The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Rego, Vitor Miguez
2021. The diachrony of Galician certamente and seguramente. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
SERRANO-LOSADA, MARIO
2020. Analogy-driven change: the emergence and development of mirativeend upconstructions in American English. English Language and Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context [Studies in Language Companion Series, 187], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.