Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp.62–92

Truncation and backshift

Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions

| Fuji Women’s University and Hokkaido University of Education

This article deals with so-called sentence-final coordinating conjunctions in some dialectal varieties of English and Japanese. It emphasises that such final coordinating conjunctions derive from two syntactically different processes (“truncation” and “backshift”), and demonstrates that the final conjunctions stemming from each process differ accordingly in syntactic, prosodic, and discourse-pragmatic terms. In both English and Japanese, the backshift type of sentence-final coordinating conjunctions (i) can be fronted to sentence/clause-initial position with no semantic/logical contradiction, (ii) have a sentence-final contour, (iii) do not tolerate being followed by a filler or interjectory particle, and (iv) express emphatic or emotive meanings. On the other hand, the truncation type of sentence-final coordinating conjunctions show the opposite characteristics. The cross-linguistic commonality observed in each of the two types of sentence-final coordinating conjunctions strongly suggests that their discourse-pragmatic meanings are cross-linguistically associated with syntactic/grammatical repertoires, such as truncation, backshift, and sentence-final position.

Keywords: sentence-final coordinating conjunction, final but, final particle, truncation, backshift, grammaticalisation
Published online: 28 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.1.04izu
References
Aitken, Adam J.
1979 “Scottish Speech: A Historical View, with Special Reference to the Standard English of Scotland.” In Languages of Scotland , ed. by Adam J. Aitken, and Tom McArthur, 85–118. Edinburgh: W & R Chambers.Google Scholar
Australian Word Map
. ABC Radio. Available at: [URL] (accessed 15 February 2010).
Christensen, Lis
1996. A First Glossary of Hiberno-English . Odense: Odense University Press.
Cruttenden, Alan
1986. Intonation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dolan, Terence Patrick
2004  A Dictionary of Hiberno-English . 2nd edition. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research , ed. by Jane A. Edwards, and Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fritz, Clemens W. A.
2005  From English in Australia to Australian English 1788-1900 . Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fujii, Seiko
1995 “Nihongo no gojun no gyakuten nitsuite: Kaiwa no naka no nagare o chuushinni [Word order reversal in Japanese: With special reference to a flow of conversation].” In Nichieigo no uhooidoo koobun: Sono koozoo to kinoo [Rightward movement in Japanese and English: Its structure and function], ed. by Ken-ichi Takami, 167–198. Tokyo: Hitsuzi.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Yoichi
1982  Hoogen bunmatsushi ‘bunmatsujoshi’ no kenkyuu (Joo) [A study of ‘final particles’ in Japanese dialects, volume 1]. Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1990. Bunmatsushi no gengogaku [ A linguistic study of final particles ]. Tokyo: Miyai.
1993. Gengo ruikeiron to bunmatsushi [Linguistic typology and final particles] . Tokyo: Miyai. DOI logo
Hamada, Mari
1995 “ Soshite to sorede to sorekara [ Soshite, sorede, and sorekara].” In Nihongo ruigi hyoogen no bunpoo (ge) [A grammar of Japanese synonyms, volume 2] , ed. by Tatsuo Miyajima, and Yoshio Nitta, 575–583. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie
2009. The Role of Prosody in Affective Speech . Bern: Peter Lang.
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final Then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3603–3623. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007 “Coordination.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description . 2nd edition, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework . Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993  Grammaticalization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara M.
1985  Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
“It’s all about Hope.”
Encounter . ABC Radio. August 9 2009 Available at: [URL] (accessed 9 September 2009).
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita, and Katsunonbu Izutsu
2010 “ ‘Okashiisho soshite ’: Hokkaidoo hoogen no hanashi kotoba de mochiirareru sosite no imi/kinooteki hoogen tokusei [‘Strange, and ’: Semantic-functional properties of sosite in spoken discourse of the Hokkaido Dialect].” In Proceedings of the 25th Congress of the Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences , ed. by The Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences, 78–81.
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-Theoretic Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Koyama, Tetsuharu
1997 “Bunmatsushi to bunmatsu intoneeshion [Sentence-final particles and sentence-final intonation].” In Bunpoo to onsei [Grammar and sound], ed. by Onsei Bunpoo Kenkyuukai, 97–119. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Lenk, Uta
1998. Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English . Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Makimura, Shiyo
(ed) 1984  Oosaka kotoba jiten [A dictionary of the Osaka speech]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Makino, Takehiko
2005. Nihonjin notameno Eigo onseigaku ressun [English phonetics lessons for Japanese people]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Moore, Bruce
2008. Speaking Our Language: The Story of Australian English . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mulder, Jean, and Sandra A. Thompson
2006 “The Grammaticization of but as a Final Particle in English Conversation.” In Selected Papers From the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society , ed. by Keith Allan, 1–18. Available at: [URL] (accessed 27 June 27 2011).
2008 “The Grammaticization of but as a Final Particle in English Conversation.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions , ed. by Ritva Laury, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Sandra A. Thompson, and Cara Penry Williams
2009 “Final but in Australian English Conversation.” In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond , ed. by Pam Peters, Peter Collins, and Asam Smith, 339–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi
2006 “An Emotively Motivated Post-Predicate Constituent Order in a ‘Strict Predicate Final’ Language: Emotion and Grammar Meet in Japanese Everyday Talk.” In Emotive Communication in Japanese , ed. by Satoko Suzuki, 139–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Ryoko Suzuki
1992 “Word Order Variability in Japanese Conversation: Motivations and Grammaticization.” Text 121: 429–445. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Onoe, Keisuke
[1999] 2010. Oosaka kotoba gaku [A study of the Osaka speech]. Tokyo: Iwanami.
“
Oosakaben [The Osaka dialect].” Weblio. Available at: [URL] (accessed 16 February 2009).
Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985  A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richards, Kel, and The Macquarie Dictionary
2005  Word Map: What Words are Used Where in Australia . Sydney: ABC Books.Google Scholar
“Speight’s Southern Man Ad.” Online video clip. YouTube
. November 12 2006 Available at: [URL] (accessed 23 August 2009).
Takami, Ken-ichi
1995 “Nichieigo no koochibun to joohoo koozoo [Postposing and information structure in Japanese and English].” In Nichieigo no uhooidoo koobun: Sono koozoo to kinoo [Rightward movement in Japanese and English: Its structure and function ], ed. by Ken-ichi Takami, 149–165. Tokyo: Hitsuzi.Google Scholar
2001  Nichieigo no uhooidoo koobun: Sono koozoo to kinoo [Rightward movement in Japanese and English: Its structure and function]. Tokyo: Ootori.Google Scholar
The Daily English Show
. January 15 2007 Available at: [URL] (accessed 23 August 2009).
The Far East Asia News@2ch BBS
. March 9 2005 Available at: [URL] (accessed 8 December 2008).
The Jerry-Love Blog
. July 8 2009 Available at: [URL] (accessed 20 September 2009).
The Tabelog
. January 5 2009 Available at: [URL] (accessed 19 September 2009).
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs.
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65 (1): 31–55. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986. Dialects in Contact . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wells, John Christopher
2006  English Intonation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yoda, Yusuke
2010 “Sore wa hontooni tooikoozoo? [Is that really coordination?].” Nihongo nihonbunka kenkyuu [Studies in Japanese language and culture] 201: 65–75.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Cuenca, Maria Josep
2020. Defective Connective Constructions: Some Cases in Catalan and Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics 4:4 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Hancil, Sylvie
2018. (Inter)subjectification and paradigmaticization. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Hata, Kazuki
2016. Contrast-terminal: The sequential placement of trailoff but in extensive courses of action. Journal of Pragmatics 101 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Hofmockel, Carolin
2017. Patterns of (inter)subjectivity. Functions of Language 24:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2016. Exaptation and adaptation. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2014. “Final hanging but” in American English. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162], ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2017. Stopgap subordinators and and but: A non-canonical structure emergent from interactional needs and typological requirements. Cognitive Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2018. Cross-varietal diversity in constructional entrenchment. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2022. American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particles so and but. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Tanno, Koji
2017. Expanding to the peripheries: A corpus-based study of the development of the Japanese discourse marker toiuka. Ampersand 4 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 286], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.