Article published In:
Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp.123–147
Speech event analysis of seventeenth-century military protocol in Hamlet, 1.1
Changing of the guard and unknown persons approaching a sentry
The opening scene of Hamlet portrays two military-related speech events — changing of the guard and unknown persons approaching a sentry. This article utilizes insights from military history, Shakespearean playhouse practice, and military protocol pragmatics to analyze these speech events. Diachronic pragmatics investigation reveals military protocol for changing of the guard portrayed by Shakespeare has continued to be followed from the late 1500s to the present time.
Identifying early seventeenth-century military protocol for guard duty at night and analyzing the function of the opening scene in Shakespearean theater, the article compares use of direct and indirect speech acts, including use of conventional and institutional ellipses, in the 1603 Quarto and 1623 First Folio. Pragmatic stylistic analysis shows the Folio version violates military protocol through use of more indirect speech acts, including expressives, unusual in these two military speech events, more effectively portraying underlying tension through the sentries’ sense of an inward, personally disturbing threat than the Quarto’s presentation of straightforward military protocol regarding unknown persons approaching sentries on duty.
References
Army Study Guide: Soldiers Helping Soldiers Since 1999
1999–2011 [URL] (accessed 1 September 2011)
Austin, J. L
1975 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 
Baldick, Chris
2001 “Prologue.” In The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare, ed. by Dobson, and Michael Wells, Stanley 357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barret, Robert
1598 The Theorike and Practike of Moderne Warres. London: Printed for Roger Warde, dwelling at the signe of the Purse in the Olde-balie. The British Library.
Barrett, Henry
1562 The Captain’s Handbook. B.L. MS. Cotton Caligula E. V. London: The British Library.
Baugh, Albert C., and Thomas Cable
2002 A History of the English Language. 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bevington, David M
1984 Action Is Eloquence: Shakespeare’s Language of Gesture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black, Elizabeth
2006 Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Blake, Norman Francis
1990 An Introduction to the Language of Literature. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
. (eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Boxer, Diana
2002 Applying Sociolinguistics: Domains and Face-to-Face Interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Brown, John Russell
2006 Hamlet. New York: Palgrave.
Cheng, Winnie, and Martin Warren
1999 “Inexplicitness: What Is It and Should We Be Teaching It?” Applied Linguistics 20( 3): 293–315.
Clark, H. H
1979 “Responding to Indirect Speech Acts.” Cognitive Psychology 111: 430–477.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Dawn Archer
2008 “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts, 1640–1760.” In Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Jucker and Andreas H. Taavitsainen, Irma 45–84. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dal Bello, Dominic J
2002 (1999) Excerpts from: Instructions for Guards and Pickets. 2nd edn. Goleta, CA: Army of the Pacific Press. [URL]( accessed 1 September 2011)
Danson, Lawrence
1974 Tragic Alphabet: Shakespeare’s Drama of Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Darrow, Pierce
1821 Scott’s Military Tactics; Comprising the Duty of Infantry, Light Infantry and Riflemen. 2nd edn. Hartford: Oliver D. Cooke. [URL]( accessed 24 October 2011)
De Somogyi, Nick
1998 Shakespeare’s Theatre of War. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Edelman, Charles
2000 Shakespeare’s Military Language. London: The Athalone Press.
Egan, Gabriel
2001 “Theatres, Elizabethan and Jacobean.” In The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare, ed. by Dobson Michael, and Wells, Stanley 468–469. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elam, Keir
1984 Shakespeare’s Universe of Discourse: Language-Games in the Comedie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Field Manual 22-6 – Guard Duty
2005-2010 [URL]( accessed 24 October 2011)
Fishman, Joshua
1972 “Domains and the Relationship between Micro- and Macrosociolinguistics.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by Gumperz John Joseph, and Hymes, Dell 435–453. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fortescue, John W
1899 A History of the British Army. New York.
Foyer Library Theater Annex
2010a Hamlet( Quarto 1, 1603). Internet Shakespeare Editions, University of Victoria. [URL]( accessed 15 September 2011)
2010b Hamlet( Folio 1, 1623). Internet Shakespeare Editions, University of Victoria. [URL]( accessed 15 September 2011)
2010c Taming of the Shrew( Folio 1, 1623). Internet Shakespeare Editions, University of Victoria. [URL]( accessed 15 September 2011)
Furness, Horace Howard
(ed.) 1898 A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare, Volume 11, The Winter’s Tale. E-book. [URL]( accessed 15 September 2011)
Garrard, William
1591 The Arte of Warre: Beeing the Onely Rare Booke of Myllitarie Profession. London: The British Library.
Giaimo, Genie
2010 “Talking Back through ‘Talkin’ Black’: African American English and Agency in Walter Mosley’s Devil in a Blue Dress.” Language and Literature 19( 3): 235–247. Retrieved from Ebsco Host.
Greenblatt, Stephen
2005 Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. London: Pimlico.
Gregory, R. W
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Cole Peter, and Morgan, Jerry L. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Jakobson, Roman
1971 “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb.” In
Russian and Slavic Grammar Studies 1931–1981
, ed. by Linda R. Waugh and Morris Halle 41–58. The Hague: Mouton.
Kautz, August V
1864 Customs of Service for Non-commissioned Officers and Soldiers. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. [URL]( accessed 20 October 2011)
Kress-Rosen, Nicolle
1974 “The Analysis of the Speech Event in Stylistic Study.” Style 8( 10): 46-55. EJ124319. [URL]( accessed 1 September 2011)
Langsam, Gert Geoffrey
1951 Martial Books and Tudor Verse. New York: King’s Crown Press.
Mazzie, Claudia A
1987 “An Experimental Investigation of the Determinants of Implicitness in Spoken and Written Discourse.” Discourse Processes 10(1): 31–42.
Miller, Joseph Hillis
2001 Speech Acts in Literature. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mowat, Barbara A., and Paul Werstine
(eds.) 1992 The New Folger Library Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare. New York: Washington Square Press.
Nash, Walter
1989 Changing the Guard at Elsinore. In Language, Discourse, and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics, ed. by Carter Ronald, and Simpson, Paul 23–42. London: Unwin Hyman.
Petrey, Sandy
1990 Speech Acts and Literary Theory. London: Routledge.
Placencia, Maria Elena
1995 “Explicitness and Ellipsis as Features of Conversational Style in British English and Ecuadorian Spanish.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 33 (2): 129–141.
Pratt, Mary Louise
1977 Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
Searle, John R
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5( 1): 1–23.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker
2008 “Speech Acts Now and Then: Towards a Pragmatic History of English.” In Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. by Jucker Andreas H, and Taavitsainen, Irma 1–16. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Taguchi, Naoko
2005 “Comprehending Implied Meaning in English as a Foreign Language.” The Modern Language Journal 89( 4): 543–562.
Thompson, Ann, and Neil Taylor
(eds.) 2006 Hamlet. London: The Arden Shakespeare.
Von Steuben, Baron
1799 Regulations for the Order and Discipline of the Troops of the United States. [URL]( accessed 24 October 2011)
Watts, Cedric
(ed.) 2000 Romeo and Juliet: Complete and Unabridged. Hertfordshire, UK: Woodsworth Editions.
Wiggins, Martin
2001 “War.” In The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare, ed. by Michael Dobson and Stanley Wells, 5161. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Peter
2000 Mind the Gap: Ellipsis and Stylistic Variation in Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Murphy, Sean, Jonathan Culpeper, Mathew Gillings & Michael Pace-Sigge
2020. What do students find difficult when they read Shakespeare? Problems and solutions. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:3 ► pp. 302 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.