Article published in:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 16:2 (2015) ► pp. 218249
References
Corpus of Late Modern English Texts Extended Version (CLMETEV)
. (See: De Smet 2005, 2012.)Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2004– BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at: http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc/.Google Scholar
Early English Books Online (EEBO)
Hitchcock, Tim, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin, et al.
The Old Bailey Proceedings Online (OBP), 1674–1913, version 7.0, 24 March 2012 (OBC). Available online at: www​.oldbaileyonline​.org.
Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder
2007 “Complement-taking Predicates: Usage and Linguistic Structure”. Studies in Language 31 (3): 569–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “A Usage-based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization”. Language 88 (1): 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. and Minoji Akimoto
(eds) 1999Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1999 “On Mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 881–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, Ray
1984Composite Predicates in English. Sydney: Academic Press Australia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos and Barbara Ürögdi
2010 “Clearing Up the ‘Facts’ on Complementation”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (1): 41–50.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1994 “Fact Projection”. In Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), Perspectives on English, 259–86. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1999Categories of Experiential Grammar. (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics.) Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
2003 “A Corpus Check of the Factive Presupposition”. In Aline Remael and Katja Pelsmaekers (eds), Configurations of Culture: Essays in Honour of Michael Windross, 115–26. Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole and Anne Wichmann
2010 “Sentence-Initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic Evidence for Use as Main Clause, Comment Clause and Discourse Marker”. Studies in Language 34 (1): 36–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2005 “A Corpus of Late Modern English Texts”. ICAME Journal 291: 69–82.Google Scholar
2012Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik and Hubert Cuyckens
2005 “Pragmatic Strenghtening and the Meaning of Complement Constructions: The Case of like and love with the to-infinitive”. Journal of English Linguistics 33 (1): 3–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions, edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1989 “Layers and Operators in Functional Grammar”. Journal of Linguistics 25 (1): 127–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet and Hubert Cuyckens
2010 “Finite and Gerundive Complementation in Modern and Present-day English: Semantics, Variation and Change”. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari and Kathryn Allan (eds), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 132–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B
1975 “On Assertive Predicates”. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 41, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2009 “Initial I think: Main or Comment Clause?Discourse and Interaction 2 (1): 49–70.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1971 “Some Observations on Factivity”. Papers in Linguistics 4 (1): 55–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky
1970 “Fact”. In Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph (eds), Progress in Linguistics, 143–73. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Urmson, James O
1952 “Parenthetical Verbs”. Mind 611: 480– 96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven and Kristin Davidse
2009 “The Emergence and Structure of be like and Related Quotatives: A Constructional Account”. Cognitive Linguistics 20 (4): 777–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An and Kristin Davidse
2009 “The Clausal Complementation of Deontic-Evaluative Adjectives in Extraposition Constructions: A Synchronic–Diachronic Approach”. Folia Linguistica 43 (1): 171–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar