Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 20:1 (2019) ► pp.20–50
Articles

A corpus-based study of composite predicates in Early Modern English dialogues

| Stockholm University

Composite predicates (CPs), that is, complex predicate structures comprising a light verb and an eventive noun (e.g., make a move or give a speech) are common in Present-day English and are particularly characteristic of spoken language. The aim of the paper is to trace language changes involving CPs from 1560 to 1760, a period in which the use of CPs has not yet received adequate scholarly attention. Specifically, the study examines the frequencies, lexical productivity and syntactic patterns of CPs in two types of Early Modern English (EModE) dialogues, drawn from Trial Proceedings and Drama Comedy sampled in A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 – a 1.2-million word computerized corpus of EModE speech-related texts. The results reveal significant differences between the two types of dialogue and shed light on the development of CPs in association with grammaticalization and lexicalization.

Keywords: composite predicate, Early Modern English, dialogue, grammaticalization, lexicalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Material and methods
    • 2.1Material
    • 2.2Selection criteria and methods
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Token frequency
    • 3.2Lexical productivity
    • 3.3Syntactic flexibility
      • 3.3.1Morphological form of the deverbal noun
      • 3.3.2Articles
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpus
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16011.wan
References (30)

Corpus

A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED)
2006 Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar
Algeo, John
1995 “Have a Look at the Expanded Predicate”. In Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer (eds), The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, 203–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allerton, D. J.
2002 Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
2008 “ ‘Where Lexis and Grammar Meet’: Composite Predicates in English”. In Elena Seoane and Mariá José López-Couso (eds), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. and Minoji Akimoto
(eds) 1999 Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Introduction”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattel, Ray
1984 Composite Predicates in English. Sydney: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2000 Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gárate, T. Moralejo
2002 “Composite Predicates and Modification Flexibility in Middle English”. Atlantis 24 (1): 299–302.Google Scholar
Herman, Vimala
1995 Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto
1999 “Verbal Phrases and Phrasal Verbs in Early Modern English”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 133–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis
2001 “Composite Predicates in Middle English with the Verbs nimen and taken ”. Studia Neophilologica 73 (2): 143–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme
2008 “Phraseology and Language Pedagogy: Semantic Preference Associated with English Verbs in the British National Corpus”. In Fanny Meunier and Sylviane Granger (eds), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja
1999 “Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Verbs in Early Modern English”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker
2006 Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 130. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Paul Rayson and Andrew Wilson
2001 Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Meiko
1999 “Composite Predicates in Middle English”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 59–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “The Historical Development and Functional Characteristics of Composite Predicates with have and take in English”. English Studies 86 (5): 439–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1958 Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Nickel, Gerhard
1968 “Complex Verbal Structures in English”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
1998 WordSmith Tools. Version 3.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Gabriele
1991 “The Phrasal Verb Type ‘to have a look’ in Modern English”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 29 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Gabriele and Randolph Quirk
1991 “On Having a Look in a Corpus”. In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 197–203. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tanabe, Harumi
1999 “Composite Predicates and Phrasal Verbs in The Paston Letters ”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 97–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1982 “Why Can You have a drink When You Can’t *have an eat?” Language 58 (4): 753–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar