Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 17:1 (2016) ► pp.107–128

The three silences of Sir Thomas More

A pragmatic perspective

| Haifa University
The paper discusses three instances of silence in the life and writings of Sir Thomas More in terms of conversational and thematic silence. The first is the silence of the London citizenry in More’s History of Richard the Third (1513). The second is the House of Commons’ response of silence, in 1523, to Cardinal Wolsey’s request to provide him, the Chancellor, with a substantial grant for state affairs; at that time, More was Speaker of the House. The third is More’s fatal silence when he was required to take an oath supporting Henry VIII’s divorce from Catherine and subsequent marriage to Anne Boleyn, and his refusal to discuss Henry’s break from the Pope and the Roman Church.
Keywords: performatives, silence, speech acts, oaths, Thomas More
Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.1.05kur
References (35)
Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent and Robert Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, John. 1979. The Tudor Law of Treason: An Introduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berger, Charles R. 2004. “Speechlessness: Causal Attributions, Emotional Features and Social Consequences”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23 (2): 147–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croyland Chronicles. 1486. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 12 October 2014).Google Scholar
Derrett, J. Duncan M. 1960. “Neglected Versions of the Contemporary Account of the Trial of Sir Thomas More”. Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 331: 202–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964. “The Trial of Sir Thomas More”. The English Historical Review, 3071: 449–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Doerge, F.C. 2013. “Performative Utterances”. In Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics: Speech Actions, 204–56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Catherine. 2012. The Divorce of Henry VIII. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Gochnauer, Myron. 1991. “Oaths, Witnesses and Modern Law”. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 4 (1): 67–100.Google Scholar
Gurevich, Zely. 1989. “Distance and Conversation”. Symbolic Interaction 12 (2): 251–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, John. 2013. “For What Did Thomas More So Silently Die?” Available online at: [URL] (accessed 8 December 2013).
Harpsfield, Nicholas. 1963 [c. 1558]. The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More . In E.E. Reynolds (ed.), Lives of St. Thomas More, 51–175. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 25 August 2014).Google Scholar
Helmholz, R.H. 2011. “Natural Law and the Trial of Thomas More”. In Henry A. Kelly, Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer (eds), Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents, 53–70. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 1993. The Power of Silence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry A. 2011. “A Procedural Review of Thomas More’s Trial”. In Henry A. Kelly, Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer (eds), Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents, 1–52. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry A., Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer. 2011a. “Thomas More’s Trial: Docudrama”. In Henry A. Kelly, Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer (eds), Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents, 210–21. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
(eds). 2011b. Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis. 1992. “When Silence May Mean Power”. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (1): 92–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Discourse of Silence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Towards a Typology of Silence”. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (10): 1673–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Thematic Silence as Metaphor”. In Ken Turner (ed.), Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, 255–63. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “A Pragmatic Analysis of Silence in an American Constitutional Issue”. Łódź Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1): 49–66.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Moment of Silence: Constitutional Transparency and Judicial Control”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 29 (2): 195–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langbein, John H. 1994. “The Historical Origins of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination at Common Law”. Michigan Law Review 921: 1047–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linder, Douglas. 2006. “The Trial of Sir Thomas More: An Account”. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 20 July 2014).
Mancini, Dominic. 1969 (1483). The Usurpation of Richard III. Ed. by C.A.J. Armstrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. 1931 (c. 1513). “The History of Richard the Third”. In W.E. Campbell (ed.), The English Works of Sir Thomas More. Volume the First, 399–455. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Pursuing a Response”. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structure of Social Action, 152–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E.E. 1964. The Trial of St. Thomas More. London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
Roper, William. 2003 (c. 1556). The Life of Sir Thomas More. Ed. by Gerard B. Wegemer and Stephen W. Smith. Irving, TX: Center for Thomas More Studies.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Thomas. 1612 [1588]. Tres Thomae. Coloniae Agrippinae. (Cologne): S. Hemmerden.Google Scholar
Vergil, Polydore. 1844 [1534]. Three Books of English History Comprising the Reigns of Henry VI, Edward IV and Richard III. Ed. by Sir Henry Ellis. London: Camden Society.Google Scholar
Villaseñor, Gala. 2013. “Effects and Interpretation of Silence in Communication: The Case of Silence as an Answer to Requests”. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, September 2013, in New Delhi, India.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kurzon, Dennis
2018. Chapter 4. Literal interpretation and political expediency. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
2018. Introduction. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.