LP and RP in the development of discourse markers from “what” in Korean
Seongha Rhee |
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
This paper describes the development of two different DMs that emerged from the interrogative pronoun mwe (literally ‘what’). Both DMs acquired discursive functions as their source structures were used rhetorically (i.e., not to solicit an answer but to elicit attention). The DM mwe shifted from its original argument position to non-argument positions including LP, and then later to RP. On the other hand, the DM mwenyamyen (literally, ‘if (you) ask (me) what (it) is’), which originated from a subordinate clause, now invariably occurs at LP as a DM. From analyses with respect to (inter)subjectification, and exchange and action structures, I argue that even though peripheries are associated with (inter)subjectivity, the hypothesized correlation between LP versus RP and subjectivity versus intersubjectivity (Beeching and Detges 2014a) is not supported. Nor is the hypothesis supported that subjectified linguistic elements will shift their positions leftward in OV languages (Traugott 2010).
1997 “I think – An English Modal Particle”. In Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2011 “The Role of the Left and Right Periphery in Semantic Change”.
Panel introduction, IPrA-12 Conference
. 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
2014a “Introduction”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill.
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
(eds)2014bDiscourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill.
Bestgen, Yves
2009 “The Discourse Function of Sentence-initial Adverbials: Studies in Comprehension”. Paper presented at
Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches to Text Structuring (LPTS) Conference
. 21–23 September. Paris.
Blakemore, Diane
2005 “And-parentheticals”. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1165–81.
Bolinger, Dwight
1989Intonation and its Uses. London: Edward Arnold.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2014 “The Extremes of Insubordination: Exclamatory as if!”. Journal of English Linguistics 14 (2): 1–21.
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 “ ‘So very fast very fast then’ Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 151–178. Leiden: Brill.
2009 “On Identifying Basic Discourse Units in Speech: Theoretical and Empirical Issues”. Discours: Revue de lingustique, psycholinguistique et informatique 41. Available online at: [URL]. DOI:
Degand, Liesbeth and Anne Catherine Simon
2014 “Form and Function of the Left Periphery”. Paper presented at the
12th Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language (CSDL) Conference
. 4–6 November. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Degand, Liesbeth and Elizabeth C. Traugott
2013 “Pragmatic Role of Elements at Right Periphery”.
Panel introduction for the pragmatic role of elements at right periphery. IPrA-13
. 8–13 September. New Delhi.
Degand, Liesbeth, Anne Catherine Simon, Noalig Tanguy and Thomas Van Damme
1993 “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know”. Studies i Modern språkvetenskap 101: 76–92.
Ernst, Thomas
2004 “Domain Adverbs and the Syntax of Adjuncts”. In Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg and Gisa Rauh (eds), Adverbials: The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure, 103–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 “A Dynamic-interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 359–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ghesquière, Lobke
2010 “On the Subjectification and Intersubjectification Paths Followed by the Adjectives of Completeness”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 277–314. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goodwin, Charles
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-final then in Spoken English”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–36.
Haselow, Alexander
2012 “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final particles in English”. Language and Communication 321: 182–204.
2013 “Cross-linguistic Approach to Form-Function-Periphery (LP and RP) Mapping: With a Special Focus on ‘Exchange Structure’ and ‘Action Structure’”.
Panel introduction, IPrA-13
. 8–13 September. New Delhi.
Keith, William M. and Christian O. Lundberg
2008The Essential Guide to Rhetoric. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak
2011 “Rhetorical Questions as Catalyst in Grammaticalization: Deriving Korean Discourse Marker ketun from Conditional Connective”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (4): 1023–41.
Kim, Hi-Jean
2003(The)-fact-is-that and Related Constructions: A Usage-based Approach and Implications in English Education. PhD thesis. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul.
Kim, Tae-Yeop
2002 “A Study on the Grammaticalization of Discourse Marker”. The Korean Language and Literature 261: 61–80.
Kim, Min-Joo and Nathan Jahnke
2010 “The Meaning of Utterance-final even”. Journal of English Linguistics 39 (1): 36–64.
Koo, Hyun Jung and Seongha Rhee
2012 “On an Emerging Paradigm of Sentence-final Particles of Discontent: A Grammaticalization Perspective”. Language Sciences 371: 70–89.
Koo, Jong Nam
2000“Tamhwaphyoci ‘mwe’uy mwunpephwawa tamhwa kinung” [Grammaticalization of the discourse marker mwe and its discourse functions]. Kwukemwunhak 351: 5–32.
Lee, Han-gyu
1999 “The Pragmatics of the Discourse Particle mwe in Korean”. Discourse and Cognition 6 (1): 137–57.
2010 “(Inter)subjectification in the Domain of Modality and Mood: Concepts and Cross-linguistic Realities”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 385–430. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2014 “Setting up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 92–116. Leiden: Brill.
1999A Cross-linguistic Study of the Use of Contrastive Connectives in English, Korean and Japanese Conversation. PhD thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Rhee, Seongha
2009 “Through a Borrowed Mouth: Reported Speech and Subjectification in Korean”. LACUS Forum 341: 201–210.
Rhee, Seongha
2012 “Context-Induced Reinterpretation and (Inter)subjectification: The Case of Grammaticalization of Sentence-Final Particles”. Language Sciences 34 (3): 284–300.
Rhee, Seongha
2014 “ ‘I know you are not, but if you were asking me’: On Emergence of Discourse Markers of Topic Presentation from Hypothetical Questions”. Journal of Pragmatics 601: 1–16.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2014 “The Interplay of Discourse and Prosody at the Left and Right Periphery in Korean: An Analysis of kuntey ‘but’”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 221–249. Leiden: Brill.
Song, Inseong
2013 “Functions and Prosodic Features of Discourse Marker ‘mweo’”. Korean Linguistics 581: 83–106.
2011 “Japanese Quotatives: Another Peripheral Magnet”. Paper presented at
IPrA-12 Conference
. 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2010 “(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2011 “ ‘He withdrew, disconcerted and offended, no doubt; but surely it was not my fault’: On the Function of Adverbs of Certainty at the Left and Right Peripheries of Clause”. Paper presented at
IPrA-12 Conference
. 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2014a “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery”. In Lieslotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde (eds), Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse, 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2014b “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs surely and no doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.
Wales, Katie
2001A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman.
Zillman, Dolf
1972 “Rhetorical Elicitation of Agreement in Persuasion”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21 (2): 159–165.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff.
Kim, Mary Shin, Stephanie Hyeri Kim & Sung-Ock Sohn
2021. The Korean discourse particle ya across multiple turn positions: An interactional resource for turn-taking and stance-taking. Journal of Pragmatics 186 ► pp. 251 ff.
Lee, Heeju & Sung-Ock Sohn
2022. From interrogative to disaffiliative stance marker: An analysis of mwusun ‘what’ in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 198 ► pp. 73 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.