Article published in:
Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 255–281

LP and RP in the development of discourse markers from “what” in Korean

| Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

This paper describes the development of two different DMs that emerged from the interrogative pronoun mwe (literally ‘what’). Both DMs acquired discursive functions as their source structures were used rhetorically (i.e., not to solicit an answer but to elicit attention). The DM mwe shifted from its original argument position to non-argument positions including LP, and then later to RP. On the other hand, the DM mwenyamyen (literally, ‘if (you) ask (me) what (it) is’), which originated from a subordinate clause, now invariably occurs at LP as a DM. From analyses with respect to (inter)subjectification, and exchange and action structures, I argue that even though peripheries are associated with (inter)subjectivity, the hypothesized correlation between LP versus RP and subjectivity versus intersubjectivity (Beeching and Detges 2014a) is not supported. Nor is the hypothesis supported that subjectified linguistic elements will shift their positions leftward in OV languages (Traugott 2010).

Keywords: action structure, discourse markers, exchange structure (inter)subjectivity, rhetorical question, left/right periphery
Published online: 06 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.2.05rhe
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
1997 “ I think – An English Modal Particle”. In Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia
2000 “A Lovely Little Example: Word Order Options and Category Shift in the Premodifying String”. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Jennifer R., Stefan Engelberg and Gisa Rauh
2004 Adverbials: The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2011 “The Role of the Left and Right Periphery in Semantic Change”. Panel introduction, IPrA-12 Conference . 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
2014a “Introduction”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(eds) 2014b Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bestgen, Yves
2009 “The Discourse Function of Sentence-initial Adverbials: Studies in Comprehension”. Paper presented at Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches to Text Structuring (LPTS) Conference . 21–23 September. Paris.
Blakemore, Diane
2005 “ And-parentheticals”. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1165–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1989 Intonation and its Uses. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008 The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The Extremes of Insubordination: Exclamatory as if! ”. Journal of English Linguistics 14 (2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 “ ‘So very fast very fast then’ Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 151–178. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard
2011 “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Anne Catherine Simon
2009 “On Identifying Basic Discourse Units in Speech: Theoretical and Empirical Issues”. Discours: Revue de lingustique, psycholinguistique et informatique 4. Available online at: http://​discours​.revues​.org​/5852. DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Form and Function of the Left Periphery”. Paper presented at the 12th Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language (CSDL) Conference . 4–6 November. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Degand, Liesbeth and Elizabeth C. Traugott
2013 “Pragmatic Role of Elements at Right Periphery”. Panel introduction for the pragmatic role of elements at right periphery. IPrA-13 . 8–13 September. New Delhi.
Degand, Liesbeth, Anne Catherine Simon, Noalig Tanguy and Thomas Van Damme
2014 “Initiating a Discourse Unit in Spoken French: Prosodic and Syntactic Features of the Left Periphery”. In Salvador Pons Bordería (eds), Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages, 243–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas
1993 “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know ”. Studies i Modern språkvetenskap 10: 76–92.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2004 “Domain Adverbs and the Syntax of Adjuncts”. In Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg and Gisa Rauh (eds), Adverbials: The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure, 103–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 “A Dynamic-interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 359–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2010 “On the Subjectification and Intersubjectification Paths Followed by the Adjectives of Completeness”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 277–314. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-final then in Spoken English”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final particles in English”. Language and Communication 32: 182–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2008 “Utterance-final Conjunctive Particles and Implicature in Japanese Conversation”. Pragmatics 18 (3): 425–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
1991 “The Grammaticalization of Rhetorical Questions in Tamil”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, (Volume 1), 253–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko and Noriko O. Onodera
2013 “Cross-linguistic Approach to Form-Function-Periphery (LP and RP) Mapping: With a Special Focus on ‘Exchange Structure’ and ‘Action Structure’”. Panel introduction, IPrA-13 . 8–13 September. New Delhi.
Keith, William M. and Christian O. Lundberg
2008 The Essential Guide to Rhetoric. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak
2011 “Rhetorical Questions as Catalyst in Grammaticalization: Deriving Korean Discourse Marker ketun from Conditional Connective”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (4): 1023–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hi-Jean
2003 (The)-fact-is-that and Related Constructions: A Usage-based Approach and Implications in English Education. PhD thesis. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul.Google Scholar
Kim, Tae-Yeop
2002 “A Study on the Grammaticalization of Discourse Marker”. The Korean Language and Literature 26: 61–80.Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo and Nathan Jahnke
2010 “The Meaning of Utterance-final even ”. Journal of English Linguistics 39 (1): 36–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Hyun Jung and Seongha Rhee
2012 “On an Emerging Paradigm of Sentence-final Particles of Discontent: A Grammaticalization Perspective”. Language Sciences 37: 70–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Jong Nam
2000 “Tamhwaphyoci ‘mwe’uy mwunpephwawa tamhwa kinung” [Grammaticalization of the discourse marker mwe and its discourse functions]. Kwukemwunhak 35: 5–32.Google Scholar
Lee, Han-gyu
1999 “The Pragmatics of the Discourse Particle mwe in Korean”. Discourse and Cognition 6 (1): 137–57.Google Scholar
Lee, Won Pyo
2001 Tamhwapwunsek [Discourse Analysis]. Seoul: Hankook Publisher.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002 [1982] Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Newcastle: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lenk, Uta
1998 Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991 “Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization”. Language 67 (3): 475–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Kil-im and Ji-hyeon Cha
2010 “Usage Patterns and Functions of Discourse Marker mwo ”. Hangeul 288: 92–119.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2007 “Modality and Grammaticalization in Japanese”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 269–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “(Inter)subjectification in the Domain of Modality and Mood: Concepts and Cross-linguistic Realities”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 385–430. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O.
2007 “Interplay of (Inter)Subjectivity and Social Norm”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 239–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Setting up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 92–116. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. and Ryoko Suzuki
2007 “Historical Changes in Japanese: With Special Focus on Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity: Introduction”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 153–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Yong Yae
1999 A Cross-linguistic Study of the Use of Contrastive Connectives in English, Korean and Japanese Conversation. PhD thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2009 “Through a Borrowed Mouth: Reported Speech and Subjectification in Korean”. LACUS Forum 34: 201–210.Google Scholar
2012 “Context-Induced Reinterpretation and (Inter)subjectification: The Case of Grammaticalization of Sentence-Final Particles”. Language Sciences 34 (3): 284–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “ ‘I know you are not, but if you were asking me’: On Emergence of Discourse Markers of Topic Presentation from Hypothetical Questions”. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2007 “(Inter)Subjectification, Japanese Syntax and Syntactic Scope Increase”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 171–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock and HyeRi Stephanie Kim
2014 “The Interplay of Discourse and Prosody at the Left and Right Periphery in Korean: An Analysis of kuntey ‘but’”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 221–249. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Song, Inseong
2013 “Functions and Prosodic Features of Discourse Marker ‘mweo’”. Korean Linguistics 58: 83–106.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko
2007 “(Inter)Subjectivification in the Quotative tte in Japanese Conversation: Local Change, Utterance-ness and Verb-ness”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 207–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Japanese Quotatives: Another Peripheral Magnet”. Paper presented at IPrA-12 Conference . 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2010 “(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “ ‘He withdrew, disconcerted and offended, no doubt; but surely it was not my fault’: On the Function of Adverbs of Certainty at the Left and Right Peripheries of Clause”. Paper presented at IPrA-12 Conference . 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
2014a “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery”. In Lieslotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde (eds), Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse, 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs surely and no doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
2001 A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Zillman, Dolf
1972 “Rhetorical Elicitation of Agreement in Persuasion”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21 (2): 159–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff. Crossref logo
Sohn, Sung-Ock S.
2016. Development of the discourse marker kulentey (‘but, by the way’) in Korean. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.