This study examines an unexplored type of speech act named jian, which took place uniquely in the
context of ancient China. Taking it as a Power Threatening Act rather than a commonly studied Face Threatening Act, this study
examined remonstrators’ strategic modulation of their jian, and the factors that might have influenced the choice
of modulation strategies. The data come from Zizhi Tongjian. The major findings are as follows: first, the speech
act of jian contained both ritualised and non-ritualised aspects; second, remonstrators would adopt different
modulation strategies when performing jian, which can be generally divided into three modulation orientations of
redress, aggravation, and a combination of redress and aggravation, with different degrees of rituality; third, the choices of
modulation strategies reflected the game playing of the requirements of affiliational propriety and illocutionary effect within
the jian act.
2010 “Epistolary Presentation Rituals Face-work, Politeness and Ritual Display in Early Modern Dutch Letter-Writing”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical (im)Politeness, 37–85. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 [1978]Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chao, Zhongchen[晁中辰]
2010 “中国古代谏议思想与谏议制度刍议” [“A Modest Proposal on the Theory and System of Ancient Chinese Remonstration”]. Dongyue Tribune (9): 63–67.
Chao, Zhongchen (ed.) [晁中辰等(编)]
2015中国谏议制度史 [The History of Ancient Chinese Remonstration System]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Chen, Qian. [陈谦]
2008 “从‘协调关系’的传播功能看中国古代谏议” [“Ancient Chinese Remonstration Revisited from the Perspective of the Communicative Function of ‘Coordinating Relation’”]. Guangxi Social Sciences 71: 99–103.
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–67.
2007 “The Pragmatics of Advice Giving: Cross-Cultural Perspectives”. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (3): 319–42.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N.
1992The Political System of Empires. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing House.
Enfield, Nick J.
2009 “Relationship Thinking and Human Pragmatics”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (1): 60–78.
Flor, Alicia M.
2005 “A Theoretical Review of the Speech Act of Suggesting: Towards a Taxonomy for Its Use in FLT”. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 181: 167–87.
Fu, Shaoliang. [傅绍良]
2006 “唐代谏诤风气与文学家谏官的命运” [“Remonstration Atmosphere and the Fate of Literati as Remonstrators in the Tang Dynasty”]. The Journal of Humanities 51: 95–101.
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company.
2008An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (Third edition revised by Christian M. I. M. Mathiessen.) Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press and Hodder Arnold.
Han, Weizhi. [韩维志]
2005 “儒家对强谏的抑扬与强谏者形象的形成” [“Confucian Modulation of Forced Admonishment and the Formation of the Images of Admonishers”]. Seeking Truth 51: 113–18.
He, Ziran and Wei Ren
2016 “Current Address Behaviour in China”. East Asian Pragmatics 1 (2): 163–80.
Hinkel, Eli
1994 “Appropriateness of Advice as L2 Solidarity Strategy”. RELCJournal 251: 71–93.
Hinkel, Eli
1997 “Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data”. Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 1–26.
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness”. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 8 (2–3): 223–48.
Jucker, Andreas H.
1994 “The Feasibility of Historical Pragmatics”. Journal of Pragmatics 22 (5): 533–46.
2007 “On Historical Chinese Apology and Its Strategic Application”. Journal of Politeness Research Language, Behaviour, Culture 3 (1): 125–50.
Kádár, Daniel Z.
2010 “Exploring the Historical Chinese Polite Denigration/Elevation Phenomenon”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (im)Politeness, 117–45. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Kádár, Daniel Z.
2012 “Historical Chinese Politeness and Rhetoric. A Case Study of Epistolary Refusals”. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 81: 93–110.
Kádár, Daniel Z.
2013Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kádár, Daniel Z.
2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Daniel Z. and Yuling Pan
2011a “Politeness in China”. In Daniel. Z. Kádár and Sara Mills (eds), Politeness in East Asia, 125–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Daniel and Yuling Pan
2011bPoliteness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
1976 “Für eine historische Analyse von Sprechakten” [“For a Historical Analysis of Speech Acts”]. In Heinrich Weber and Harald Weydt (eds), Sprachtheorie und Pragmatik [Language Theory and Pragmatics], 113–19. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte
1983Tradition des Sprechens: Elemente einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichtsschreibung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
2015 “宪政结构中的谏议制度及其现代意义” [“The Remonstration System in the Constitutional Structure and its Modern Implication”]. Tian Fu Xin Lun (31): 41–52.
Shi, Wei. [史伟]
2012 “言谏政风与贞观谏议制度之发展” [“The Political Climate of the Remonstrance and the Development of the Remonstrance System in the Zhenguan Period”]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (31): 131–35.
Sima, Guang. et al. (eds). [司马光等(编)]
2011Comprehensive Mirror in Aid of Governance. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. Available online at: [URL]
Skewis, Malcolm
2003 “Mitigated Directness in Honglou Meng: Directive Speech Acts and Politeness in Eighteenth Century Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2): 161–89.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
2010 “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 3–30. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wang, Changhua and Pengge Zhao. [王长华、赵棚鸽]
2010 “《毛诗》美、刺与唐代谏诤精神” [“Chanting and Irony in Mao’s Annotations of Book of Songs and Persuasion and Remonstration in Tang”]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (61): 36–42.
Wang, Jin. [王谨]
2008 “中国上古谏政制度” [“The System of Remonstrative Politics in Ancient China”]. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy and Social Science) (41): 44–48.
Wang, Xueyu and Xinren Chen
2013 “Studies on Historical Pragmatics Abroad”. Modern Foreign Languages 36 (3): 308–14+331.
Watts, Richard J.
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, Jing. [吴兢]
2011Zhen Guan Zheng Yao. Changsha: Yeulu Press.
Xiao, Zhanpeng and Wei Liu. [肖占鹏、刘伟]
2008 “试议谏诤精神对唐代文学写实倾向的影响” [“The Influence of Remonstrant Spirit on Literature in the Tang Dynasty”]. Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition) 61: 99–104.
Zeng, Zhenyu. [曾振宇]
2007 “孟子孝论对孔子思想的发展与偏离 – 从‘以正致谏’到 ‘父子不责善’” [“Inheritance and Departure: Mencius’s Idea on Confucius’ Filial Thoughts – From ‘Exhortation between Father and Children’ to ‘Nonexhortation between Father and Children’”]. Journal of Historical Science 111: 29–36.
Zha, Qinglan. and Qingping Zha. [查清兰、查清平]
2009 “婉转曲折辞简意深 –《左传》谏说辞令的解读” [“Implicit yet Profound – an Interpretation of the Remonstration Language in Zuo Zhuan
”]. Masterpieces Review 91: 10–12.
Zhang, Gui. [张贵]
2015 “宋仁宗朝谏官活动与怪奇文风研究” [“Study on Remonstration of Officials during the Reign of Song Renzong and Eccentric Style”]. Seeking Truth (21): 128–34.
Zhang, Yushu and Tingjing Chen (eds) [张玉书、陈廷敬等(编)]
2004Kangxi Dictionary. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. Available online at: [URL]
Zhou, Yu and Shuiyuan Huang [周妤、黄水源]
2010 “清人论纳谏与谏铮之道” [“The Qing Dynasty People’s Discussions about the Methods of Accepting Opinions and Advising”]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition) 41: 57–60.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu & Yulong Song
2021. Admonishing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Ridealgh, Kim & L. Unceta Gómez
2020. Potestas and the language of power: Conceptualising an approach to Power and Discernment politeness in ancient languages. Journal of Pragmatics 170 ► pp. 231 ff.
Wu, Yujun
2024. Research on Text Value and Linguistic Characteristics in Ancient Literature Based on Text Mining Technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.