Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.1–33

A Grammar of Authority?

Directive speech acts and terms of address in two single-genre corpora of Classical French

ORCID logo | Universität Potsdam
 | Université de Neuchâtel
Directive Speech Acts (dsas) are a major feature of historical pragmatics, specifically in research on historical (im)politeness. However, for Classical French, there is a lack of research on related phenomena. In our contribution, we present two recently constructed corpora covering the period of Classical French, sermo and apwcf. We present these corpora in terms of their genre characteristics on a communicative–functional and socio-pragmatic level. Based on the observation that, both in sermo and apwcf, dsas frequently occur together with terms of address, we analyse and manually code a sample based on this co-occurrence, and we compare the results with regard to special features in the individual corpora. The emerging patterns show a clear correspondence between socio-pragmatic factors and the linguistic means used to realise dsas. We propose that these results can be interpreted as signs of an underlying “grammar of authority”.
Keywords: corpus, correspondence, directive speech acts, politeness, sermons, terms of address
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Presentation of the two corpora
    • 2.1 sermo
    • 2.2 apwcf
    • 2.3Synthesis: Pragmatic perspectives on sermo and apwcf
  • 3.Politeness and speech act analysis in diachronic (corpus) pragmatics
    • 3.1General problems
    • 3.2Linguistic analysis of dsa in historical corpora
  • 4.Methodological decisions and coding
    • 4.1Retrieving dsa
    • 4.2The structure of dsas: Bottom-up classification and coding
  • 5.Comparative analysis
    • 5.1Terms of address and dsas
    • 5.2Expressions introducing a dsa (P1)
    • 5.3The action to be performed (P2)
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17006.ger
References (119)
Sources
apw
apwcf = Gerstenberg, Annette. 2014–. Linguistic corpus of APW II B1-APW II B6, based on XML version APW digital. Berlin and Potsdam. [URL]
apw digital = Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Universität Bonn, and Zentrum für Historische Forschung. 2013. Acta Pacis Westphalicae (APW) digital. München: BSB; Münchner Digitalisierungszentrum (MDZ). APW digital. [URL]
APW II B 1 (1979) = Acta Pacis Westphalicae. Serie II: Korrespondenzen. Abteilung B: Die französischen Korrespondenzen. Bd. 1: 1644. Bearbeitet von Ursula Irsigler unter Benutzung der Vorarbeiten von Kriemhild Goronzy. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
APW II B 2 (1986) = Acta Pacis Westphalicae. Serie II: Korrespondenzen. Abteilung B: Die französischen Korrespondenzen. Bd. 2: 1645. Bearbeitet von Franz Bosbach unter Benutzung der Vorarbeiten von Kriemhild Goronzy und unter Mithilfe von Rita Bohlen. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
APW II B 3/1–2 (1999) = Acta Pacis Westphalicae Serie II: Korrespondenzen. Abteilung B: Die französischen Korrespondenzen. Bd. 3/1–21: 1645–1646. Unter Benutzung der Vorarbeiten von Kriemhild Goronzy bearbeitet von Elke Jarnut (†) und Rita Bohlen mit einer Einleitung und einem Anhang von Franz Bosbach. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
APW II B 4 (1999) = Acta Pacis Westphalicae. Serie II: Korrespondenzen. Abteilung B: Die französischen Korrespondenzen. Bd. 41: 1646. Bearbeitet von Clivia Kelch-Rade und Anuschka Tischer unter Mithilfe von Michael Rohrschneider und unter Benutzung der Vorarbeiten von Kriemhild Goronzy. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
APW II B 5/1–2 (2002) = Acta Pacis Westphalicae. Serie II: Korrespondenzen. Abteilung B: Die französischen Korrespondenzen. Bd. 5/1–21: 1646–1647. Bearbeitet von Guido Braun unter Benutzung der Vorarbeiten von Kriemhild Goronzy und Achim Tröster sowie unter Mithilfe von Antje Oschmann am Register. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
APW II B 6 (2004) = Acta Pacis Westphalicae. Serie II: Korrespondenzen. Abteilung B: Die französischen Korrespondenzen. Bd. 61: 1647. Bearbeitet von Michael Rohrschneider unter Benutzung der Vorarbeiten von Kriemhild Goronzy und unter Mithilfe von Rita Bohlen. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
sermo
sermo: Corpus of Sermons, result of a project financed by the Swiss National science foundation. sermo: Corpus of Sermons, [URL], the result of a project financed by the Swiss National science Foundation, sermo i: “Méthode d’annotation et d’exploitation de corpus paralittéraires pour l’analyse en linguistique diachronique”.
1555_Calvin = Calvin, J. (1555). Deux Sermons sur la premiere Epistre à Timothée, Genève, Jean Gérard.Google Scholar
1567_Calvin = Calvin, J. (1567). Sermon sur le Deuteronome, Genève, Thomas Courteau.Google Scholar
1593_de_Bèze = de Bèze, Th. (1593). Sermons sur l’histoire de la resurrection de nostre Seigneur Iesus Christ. Genève, Jean Le Preux.Google Scholar
1594_Merlin = Merlin, P. (1594). Sermons sur le livre d’Ester, Genève, François Le Preux.Google Scholar
1598_Séguier = Séguier, N. (1598). Vintquatre Homelies, ou, Sermons familiers, sur le LIII. Chap. du Livre des Revelations du prophete Esaïe, Genève, Jaques Chouët.Google Scholar
1604_Du_Buc = Du Buc, G. (1604). XXIIII Homelies ou Sermons sur l’oraison dominicale. Genève, Jean Le Preux.Google Scholar
1613_de_Combes = de Combles, F. (1613). Trois Sermons touchant la preparation requise pour communiquer deuëment & dignement à la Cene de nostre Seigneur, Genève, Pierre & Jacques Chouët.Google Scholar
1615_de_Bèze = de Bèze, Th. (1615). Sermons sur les trois premiers chapitres du Cantique des Cantiques de Salomon, Genève, Pierre & Jacques Chouët.Google Scholar
1624_Primerose = Primerose, G. (1624). Six Sermons de la réconciliation de l’homme avec Dieu, Sedan.Google Scholar
1627_Durant = Durant, S. (1627). L’Histoire de la tentation de Nostre Seigneur Iesvs Christ. Exposée en XVIII. Sermons, en l’Eglise Reformée de Paris, Genève, Pierre Aubert.Google Scholar
1630_Turrettin = Turrettin, B. (1630). Profit des chastimens ou sept sermons sur l’exhortation contenue en l’Epist. aux Hebrieux chap. XII. v. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11, Genève, Pierre Aubert.Google Scholar
1632_Le_Faucheur = Le Faucheur, M. (1632). Sermon des souffrances des Fidelles & de leur gloire, Charenton, Pierre Auvray.Google Scholar
1645_Mestrezat = Mestrezat, J. (1645). Sermon, sur le pseaume CXXX. Vers. 1. 2. 3. & 4, Charenton, Samuel Petit.Google Scholar
1649_Spanheim = Spanheim, F. (1649). Les Thrones de Grace. de Iugement. de Gloire, Genève, Etienne Maupeau.Google Scholar
1658_Daillé = Daillé, J. (1658). Melange de Sermons, Prononcés par Jean Daillé à Charenton pres de Paris, en divers temps, & sur differens sujets. Amsterdam, Jean de Ravesteyn.Google Scholar
1660_Le Faucheur = Le Faucheur, M. (1660). Sermons sur divers textes de l’Escriture Sainte, Seconde Partie. Genève, Pierre Chouët.Google Scholar
1665_Drelincourt = Drelincourt, Ch. (1665). Le Salutaire Lever du soleil de iustice ou Sermon sur Malachie, Chap. IV. Vers. 2. Prononcé au Synode de Saintonge, à Taillebourg, le Dimanche 9 Août 1665, Genève, Jean Antoine & Samuel De Tournes.Google Scholar
1670_Tronchin = Tronchin, L. (1670). SERMON SVR CES PAROLES du Ps. XCV. vers. VII. Aujourdui, si vous oyez sa voix, n’endurcissez point vôtre cœur ; Prononcé au jour du Ieusne celebré à Geneve, le 30. de Ianvier 1670. à l’occasion de l’Incendie arrivé le I8. du mesme mois. Genève, Pierre Chouët.Google Scholar
1674_Spanheim = Spanheim, F. (1674). Recueil de Sermons pour la consolation de l’Eglise, Leide, Pierre van der Aa.Google Scholar
1676_Claude = Claude, J. (1676). Les Fruits de la repentance, ou Sermon sur ces paroles de Salomon = Il y aura propitiation pour l’iniquité par gratuité & verité : Et par la crainte de l’Eternel, on se détourne du mal. Quand l’Eternel prend plaisir aux voyes de l’homme il appaise mesme enuers luy ses ennemis. Proverb. 16. v. 6. & 7. Charenton, Olivier de Varennes.Google Scholar
1680_Chevalier = Chevalier, J.-J. (1680). Presche fait à la Breuine à l’heureuse arriuée de Son Altesse Sérenissime Madame la Duchesse De Nemours. Manuscrit.Google Scholar
1690_Brousson = Brousson, C. (1690). La Manne mystique du désert, Amsterdam, Henry Desbordes.Google Scholar
1691_Le Gendre = Le Gendre, Ph. (1691). La Priere de saint Etienne, ou Sermon sur le 7. Ch. des Actes des Apôtres v. 60. Rotterdam, Pierre Vander Slaart.Google Scholar
1701_Rossal = Rossal, P. (1701). Les Droits de Dieu, & ceux des Souverains, ou Sermon sur le Couronnement de Sa Majestê, Frederic Roi de Prusse… Halberstadt, Jean-David Bergmann.Google Scholar
1715_Pictet = Pictet, B. (1715). L’Examen des chrétiens. Ou Sermon sur Apoc. III. v. 1. 2. 3, Genève, Jean Antoine Querel.Google Scholar
1716_Dubourdieu = Dubourdieu, J.-A. (1716). La Faction de la Grande-Bretagne Caractérisée & Confonduë. Ou Sermon sur ces Paroles de la II. Epître de St. Paul aux Corinthiens Chap. 11. v. 26. Londres, Moïse Chastel.Google Scholar
1727_Rival = Rival, P. (1727). Sermon prononcé le 25 de Juin, 1727 à l’occasion de l’avenement du Roy George II, Londres, de Sam. Jallasson.Google Scholar
1728_Faigaux = Faigaux, F.-L. (1728). Le Triomphe de Jésus-Christ, et de ses ministres. Ou Sermon sur ce Texte : Graces à Dieu qui nous fait toûjours triompher en Jesus-Christ. 2. Cor. II. 14. Berne, Jean Bondeli.Google Scholar
1737_Le Maître = Le Maître, J.-H. (1737). Sermons sur divers textes de l’Ecriture sainte prononcez dans des occasions extraordinaires, Lemgo, Chez Jean Henri Meyer.Google Scholar
1745_Des Vœux = Des Vœux, V. (1745). Trois Sermons. I. Sur la véritable Patrie des François Réfugiés. II. Sur l’interposition singulière de la Providence dans la Révolution de 1688. III. Sur l’obligation indispensable de soutenir les Droits du Roi contre les Rebelles. Dublin, S. Powell.Google Scholar
Tools
presto Parameters for treetagger = Diwersy, Sascha et al. (2014): Modèle panchronique d’étiquetage morphosyntaxique pour le français (16e–20e siècles). Köln, Nancy.Google Scholar
The reference corpus of the French-German project presto ([URL]) covering the time span from the sixteenth to the twentieth century consists of texts originating from the following databases: frantext ([URL]; V. Montémont, G. Souvay), bvh (Bibliothèques Virtuelles Humanistes, [URL]; L. Bertrand, M.-L. Demonet), artfl (American and French Research on the Treasury of the French Language, [URL]; R. Morrissey, M. Olsen), and cepm (Corpus électronique de la première modernité, [URL]). The resources and tools elaborated in the context of presto were improved by the tool kits of lgerm (lemmatisation of the graphical variation in Old French and its morphological and lexical inventory, G. Souvay [URL]), analog (M.-H. Lay), and the lexicon morphalou ([URL]), [URL]
treetagger = Schmid, Helmut. 2008. “TreeTagger – a Language Independent Part-of-speech Tagger”. Accessed 19 September 2012 at: [URL]. (14.04.2017).
txm = Heiden, Serge. “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme”. TXM. Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 24). 4–7 November 2010, Sendai. TXM.
txm = Heiden, Serge, Jean-Philippe Magué, and Bénédicte Pincemin. 2010. “TXM : Une plateforme logicielle open-source pour la textométrie – conception et développement”. Journées internationales d’Analyse Statistique des données Textuelles 71.Google Scholar
References
Amattuzzi, Antonella, Wendy Ayres-Bennet, Annette Gerstenberg, Lene Schøsler and Carine Skupien Dekens. 2020. “Changement linguistique et périodisation du français (pré)classique: deux études de cas à partir des corpus du RCFC” [‘Linguistic Change and Periodization of (pre)Classical French: Two Case Studies from the RCFC Corpora’]. Journal of French Language Studies 30 (3): 301–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 2014. “From l’usage to ‘le bon usage’ and Back: Norms and Usage in Seventeenth-Century France”. In Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters and Wim Vandenbussche (eds), Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective, 173–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy and Philippe Caron. 2016. “Periodization, Translation, Prescription, and the Emergence of Classical French”. Transactions of the Philological Society 114 (1): 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badiou-Monferran, Claire. 2004. “Négation et coordination en français classique: le morphème ‘ni’ dans tous ses états” [‘Negation and Co-ordination in Classical French: The Morpheme “ni” in All its Facets’]. Langue française 1431: 69–92.Google Scholar
de Balzac, Guez. 1934. Les premières lettres de Guez de Balzac 1618–1627. Édition critique précédé d’une introduction par H. Bibas et K.-T. Butler [‘The First Letters of Guez de Balzac 1618–1627. Critical Edition with an Introduction by H. Bibas and K.-T. Butler’]. (Volume 21.) Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Bennett, Paul, Martin Durrell, Silke Scheible and Richard J. Whitt (eds). 2013. New Methods in Historical Corpora. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bon usage = Grevisse, Maurice. 2008. Le bon usage [‘Good Use (of Language)’]. Brussels: De Boeck Duculot.Google Scholar
Bost, Hubert. 2013. “La prédication protestante au creuset de l’épreuve et de la persécution” [‘Protestant Preaching between Commitment and Persecution’]. Revue Bossuet 41: 235–251.Google Scholar
Braun, Guido. 2014. “La formation des diplomatà l’époque moderne” [‘The Education of Diplomats in the Modern Period’]. Revue d’histoire diplomatique 1281: 231–249.Google Scholar
Brian, Isabelle. 2014. Prêcher à Paris sous l’Ancien Régime. XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles [‘Preaching in Paris under the Ancien Régime: 17th–18th Centuries’]. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca und Revere D. Perkins. 1991. “Back to the Future: Approaches to Grammaticalization”. In Bernd Heine and Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–58. (Volume II: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers .) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbonnier-Burkard, Marianne. 2015. “Une prédication laïque. Les prêches des prédications du ‘premier Désert’ (1685–1700)” [‘Secular Preaching: The Sermons of the “First Desert” (1685–1700)’]. In Monique Vénuat and Christian Jérémie (eds), L’éloquence ecclésiastique de la pré-Réforme aux Lumières [‘The Ecclesiastical Eloquence from pre-Reformation to Enlightenment’], 221–246. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Christ, Günter. 2004. “Der Exzellenz-Titel für die kurfürstlichen Gesandten auf dem Westfälischen Friedenskongreß” [‘The Title Excellency for the Electoral Ambassadors at the Congress of Westphalia’]. Parliaments, Estates and Representation 191: 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combettes, Bernard. 2003. “L’évolution de la forme en ‘–ant’: aspects syntaxiques et textuels” [‘The Evolution of ‘–ant’ Forms: Syntactic and Textual Aspects’]. Langages 149 (37): 6–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Diachronic Linguistics and Electronic Corpora”. In Henry Tyne, Virginie André, Christophe Benzitoun, Alex Boulton and Yan Greub (eds), French through Corpora, 2–11. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1979. “On the Sociolinguistic Relevance of Routine Formulae”. Journal of Pragmatics 3 (3–4): 239–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denoyelle, Corinne. 2006. “La textualité dialogique dans le Lancelot en prose” [‘Dialogical Textuality in Prose Lancelot’]. Verbum 11: 81–107.Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Les réalisations des actes de langage directifs dans les ‘Manières de langage’” [‘The Realisation of Directive Speech Acts in “Linguistic Manners”’]. In Amalia Rodríguez Somolinos (ed.), Les marques de l’oralité en français medieval [‘Marks of Orality in Medieval French’], 149–175. Paris: Presses Universitaires Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “La formulation des requêtes dans quelques textes littéraires médiévaux” [‘The Formulation of Request in Some Medieval Literary Texts’]. In Dominique Lagorgette (ed.), Représentations du sens linguistique [‘Representations of Linguistic Meaning’], 91–114. (Volume 51.) Chambéry: Université de Savoie Labo LLS.Google Scholar
DHLF = Rey, Alain. 2000. Dictionnaire historique de la langue française [‘Historical Dictionary of the French Language’]. Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana. 2015. “Politeness”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics, 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engammare, Max. 2013. “Reformed Preaching in the Sixteenth Century. The Use of Lectionaries in Zurich”. Zwingliana 42 (1–2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Ford, James Thomas. 2001. “Preaching in the Reformed Tradition”. In Larissa Taylor (ed.), Preachers and People in the Reformations and Early Modern Period, 65–88. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fournier, Nathalie. 1998. Grammaire du français Classique [‘Grammar of Classical French’]. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Frank, Birgit. 2011. Aufforderung im Französischen: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte sprachlicher Höflichkeit [‘Request in French: A Contribution to the History of Linguistic Politeness’]. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerstenberg, Annette. 2014. “Diskursive Spezialisierung infiniter Verbformen in den französischen Texten der APW” [‘Discursive Specialisation of Infinite Verb Forms in the French Texts of the APW’]. In Annette Gerstenberg (ed.), Verständigung und Diplomatie auf dem Westfälischen Friedenskongress. Historische und sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge [‘Agreement and Diplomacy at the Congress of Westphalia: Historical and Linguistic Approaches’], 172–194. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleßgen, Martin-Dietrich. 2005. “Diskurstraditionen zwischen pragmatischen Vorgaben und sprachlichen Varietäten” [‘Discourse Traditions between Pragmatic Constraints and Linguistic Varieties’]. In Angela Schrott and Harald Völker (eds), Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik. Traditionen, Methoden und Modelle in der Romanistik [‘Historical Pragmatics and Historical Variational Linguistics: Traditions, Methods and Models in Romance Studies’], 207–228. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.Google Scholar
Goeury, Julien. 2018. “Des sermons prononcés comme ils ont été écrits, ou bien écrits comme ils ont été prononcés?” [‘Sermons Delivered as They Were Written, or Written as They Were Delivered?’]. In Gabriel Aubert, Amy Heneveld and Cinthia Meli (eds), L’éloquence de la chaire. Entre écriture et oralité (XIIIe-XVIIIe siècles) [‘The Eloquence of the Pulpit: Between Writing and Orality (13th–18th Centuries)’], 131–146. Paris: Honoré Champion Editions.Google Scholar
Hotman, Ian. 1613. De la charge et dignité de l’ambassadeur: Troisieme edition augmentée, & meilleure [‘On Duty and Dignity of the Ambassador: Third Edition, Increased and Improved’]. Düsseldorf: Bernard Busius.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1994. “The Feasibility of Historical Pragmatics”. Journal of Pragmatics 22 (5): 533–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 178–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2014. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Intersections and Interactions”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2013. From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. “Corpora and Speech Acts: the Study of Performatives”. In Christian Mair (ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory: Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), Freiburg Im Breisgau 1999, 177–186. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Towards a History of English Directives”. In Andreas Fischer and Therese Lutz (eds), Text Types and Corpora: Studies in Honour of Udo Fries, 165–175. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Text Types and Methodology in Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139–166. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?” In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Religious Discourse”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 523–547. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kremos, Helene. 1955. Höflichkeitsformeln in der französischen Sprache: Aufforderungs- und Bittformeln; Dankesbezeugungen (mit historischem Rückblick bis ins 16. Jahrhundert) [‘Courtesy Formulas in the French Language: Asking and Request; Acknowledgment (with an Historical Look Back to the 16th Century)’]. Zürich: Schippert.Google Scholar
Lagorgette, Dominique. 1994. “Termes d’adresse, acte perlocutoire et insultes: la violence verbale dans quelques textes des XIVème, XVème et XVIème siècles” [‘Terms of Address, Perlocutionary Acts and Insults: Verbal Violence in Some Texts from the 14th, 15th and 16th Centuries’]. In Presses universitaires de Provence (ed.), La violence dans le monde medieval [‘Violence in the Medieval World’], 207–216. (Volume 361.) Aix-en-Provence: CUER MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Termes d’adresse et verbes de parole en Moyen Français” [‘Terms of Address and Verba Dicendi in Middle French’]. In López Muñoz, Juan Manuel, Sophie Marnette and Laurence Rosier (eds), Le discours rapporté dans tous ses états: Actes du colloque international, Bruxelles, 8–11 novembre 2001 [‘Reported Speech in All its Facets: Proceedings of the International Conference, Brussels, 8–11 November 2001’], 194–203. Paris, Budapest, Torino: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Du vocatif à l’apostrophe: Problèmes terminologiques et théoriques, termes d’adresse et détachement en diachronie en français” [‘From Vocative to Apostrophe: Terminological and Theoretical Problems, Terms of Address and Detachment in Diachrony in French’]. L’information grammaticale 1091: 38–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lebsanft, Franz. 1988. Studien zu einer Linguistik des Grusses: Sprache und Funktion der altfranzösischen Grussformeln [‘Studies in Linguistics of Greeting: Language and Function of the Old French Greeting Formulas’]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Léonard, Julien. 2017. “L’imposition des mains données aux nouveaux pasteurs en France” [‘The Laying on of Hands Given to New Pastors in France’]. In Olivier Christin and Yves Krumenacker (eds), Les Protestants à l’époque moderne. Une approche anthropologiquem [‘Protestants in the Modern Period: An Anthropological Approach’], 317–333. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
van der Linden, David. 2015. Experiencing Exile: Huguenot Refugees in the Dutch Republic 1680–1700. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Maag, Karin. 2006. “Preaching Practice: Reformed Students’ Sermons”. In Wim Janse and Barbara Pitkin (eds), The Formation of Clerical and Confessional Identities in Early Modern Europe, 133–146. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Magendie, Maurice. 1970. La politesse mondaine [‘Worldly Politeness’]. Genève: Slatkine.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 2008. “L’évolution de l’ordre des mots en français: Chronologie, périodisation, et réorganisation du système” [‘The Evolution of Word Order in French: Chronology, Periodisation, and Reorganisation of the System’]. In Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert and Bernard Laks (eds), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF’08 [‘World Congress of French Linguistics – CMLF’08’], 103–113. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina and Andrea Sansò. 2011. “How Directive Constructions Emerge. Grammaticalization, Constructionalization, Cooptation”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3489–3521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mentzer, Raymond A. 2017. “L’introduction des méreaux et des bancs dans les Eglises réformées de France aux XVIe et XVIIe siècle” [‘The Introduction of ‘méreaux’ and Banks in the Reformed Churches of France in the 16th and 17th Centuries’]. In Olivier Christin and Yves Krumenacker (eds), Les Protestants à l’époque moderne. Une approche anthropologiquem [‘Protestants in the Modern Period: An Anthropological Approach’], 39–51. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Moessner, Lilo. 2010. “Directive Speech Acts: A Cross-generic Diachronic Study”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (11/2): 219–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montémont, Véronique. 2011. “Bâtir une ressource lexicale: l’aventure de Frantext” [‘Building a Lexical Resource: The Adventure of Frantext’]. In Jean-Paul Bravard, Natalia Del Fatti, Ioan Negrutiu and Cristina Vieira (eds), Les ressources [‘Resources’], 315–326. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar
Oppermann-Marsaux, Evelyne. 2000. Les emplois injonctifs du futur en français medieval [‘The Use of Command Forms of the Future in Medieval French’]. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Injonction et interjection: l’évolution des emplois de l’impératif ‘allons’” [‘Instruction and Interjection: The Evolution of Imperative “allons” [‘let’s go’]’. In Bernard Combettes, Céline Guillot, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux, Sophie Prévost and Amalia Rodríguez Somolinos (eds), Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique [‘Change in French: Studies in Diachronic Linguistics’], 311–324. Bern, Berlin, Brussels, Frankfurt am Main, New York (NY), Oxford and Wien: Lang.Google Scholar
Osthus, Dietmar. 2014. “Der Friedenskongress als Ort metasprachlicher Konflikte” [‘The Peace Congress as a Place of Metalinguistic Conflicts’]. In Annette Gerstenberg (ed.), Verständigung und Diplomatie auf dem Westfälischen Friedenskongress. Historische und sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge [‘Agreement and Diplomacy at the Congress of Westphalia: Historical and Linguistic Approaches’], 89–104. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 2015. “Changing Genre Conventions and Socio-cultural Change: Person-mention in 19th-century English Advertisements”. In Birte Bös and Lucia Kornexl (eds), Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse, 81–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie. 2015. “Diachronie du français et linguistique de corpus: une approche quantitative renouvelée” [‘Diachrony of French and Corpus Linguistics: A New Quantitative Approach’]. Langages 1971: 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radtke, Edgar. 2006. “Historische Pragmalinguistik: Aufgabenbereiche” [‘Historical Pragmalinguistics: Topics’]. In Gerhard Ernst, Martin-Dietrich Gleßgen, Christian Schmitt and Wolfgang Schweickard (eds), Romanische Sprachgeschichte: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Geschichte der romanischen Sprachen [‘Romance Language History: An International Handbook on the History of Romance Languages’], 2292–3302. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellat and René Rioul. 2009. Grammaire méthodique du français [‘Methodical Grammar of French’]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Introduction. Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selig, Maria. 2005. “Schreiberprofile und Sprachstandardisierung. Bemerkungen zur mediävistischen Korpuslinguistik” [‘Writers’ Profiles and Language Standardisation: Remarks on Medieval Corpus Linguistics’]. In Angela Schrott and Harald Völker (eds), Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik. Traditionen, Methoden und Modelle in der Romanistik [‘Historical Pragmatics and Historical Variational Linguistics: Traditions, Methods and Models in Romance Studies’], 255–68. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst. 2003. “From Pragmatics to Grammar: Tracing the Development of Respect in the History of the German Pronouns of Address”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 85–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skupien-Dekens, Carine. 2014. “Reste-t-il des marques de l’oral dans les sermons de Calvin?” [‘Are There Traces of Spoken Language in Calvin’s Sermons?’]. In Dorothée Aquino-Weber, Federica Diémoz, Laure Grüner and Aurélie Reusser-Elzingre (eds), Toujours langue varie…: Mélanges de linguistique historique du français et de dialectologie galloromane offerts à M. le Professeur Andres Kristol par ses collègues et anciens élèves [‘The Language Always Changes…: Mélanges of Historical Linguistics of French and Gallo-Roman Dialectology Offered to Professor Andres Kristol by His Colleagues and Alumni’], 83–97. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Un genre sous-exploité en histoire du français pré-classique et classique: le sermon” [‘An Understudied Genre in the History of Pre-classical and Classical French: The Sermon’]. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett and Sophie Prévost (eds), Nouvelles voies d’accès au changement linguistique [‘New Ways to Access Language Change’], 69–84. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Spillebout, Gabriel and Gérald Antoine. 2007. Grammaire de la langue française du XVIIe siècle [‘Seventeenth Century French Grammar’]. Paris: Eurédit.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Richard. 1980. Interprètes de la Bible, études sur les Réformateurs du XVIe siècle [‘Translators of the Bible: Studies of the Reformers of the 16th Century’]. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara. 2008. Des Kaisers alte Kleider. Verfassungsgeschichte und Symbolsprache des Alten Reiches [‘The Emperor’s Old Clothes: Constitutional History and Symbolic Language of the Holy Roman Empire’]. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan M. Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical Pragmatics: What it is and how to do it”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2008a. “Speech Acts Now and Then. Towards a Pragmatic History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 107–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tischer, Anuschka. 1999. Französische Diplomatie und Diplomaten auf dem Westfälischen Friedenskongress. Außenpolitik unter Richelieu und Mazarin [‘French Diplomacy and Diplomats at the Congress of Westphalia: Foreign Policy under Richelieu and Mazarin’]. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Vaugelas, Claude Favre de and Wendy Ayres-Bennett. 2018 [1647]. Remarques sur la langue françoise [‘Notes on the French Language’]. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Kwong-Cheong Wong
2024. Language games and their types. Linguistics and Philosophy 47:1 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Linzmeier, Laura
2022. La houle et la plume : la scripturalité des groupes d’experts maritimes en France aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles entre document institutionnel et égo-document. Linx :85 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.