This paper explores the representation of speech in Early Modern English witness depositions. We demonstrate that Semino and Short’s (2004) framework of description, which has for the most part been used in explorations of present-day texts, is generally applicable to our historical data. Our study shows that factors such as the importance of the evidence cited and the clarity of the deposition narrative were crucial considerations in representing speech in different contexts.
An Electronic Text Edition of Depositions 1560–1760 (ETED)
2011 Edited by Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker. Available on the CD accompanyingTestifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England by Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baynham, Mike and Stef Slembrouck
1999 “Speech Representation and Institutional Discourse”. Text 19 (4): 439–457.
Bednarek, Monika
2006 “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text-Driven Approach”. Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660.
Busse, Beatrix
Forthcoming. Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in 19th-Century Narrative Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Camiciotti, Gabriella Del Lungo
2000 “Orality and Written Texts: The Representation of Discourse in the Book of Margery Kempe”. In Gabriella di Martino and Maria Lima (eds), English Diachronic Pragmatics, 143–157. Napoli: CUEN.
Camiciotti, Gabriella Del Lungo
2007 “Discoursal Aspects of the Legends of Holy Women by Osbern Bokenham”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 285–305. Berlin: Mouton.
Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig
1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations”. Language 66 (4): 764–805.
Clift, Rebecca and Elizabeth Holt
2007 “Introduction”. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2011 “Chapter 2: Genre Characteristics”. In Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker, Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England, 15–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (Second edition.) London: Edward Arnold.
Holt, Elizabeth and Rebecca Clift
(eds)2007Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2006 “ ‘but ’tis believed that…’: Speech and Thought Presentation in Early English Newspapers”. In Nicholas Brownlees (ed.), News Discourse in Early Modern Britain: Selected Papers of CHINED 2004, 105–125. Bern: Peter Lang.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Manuel Berger
2014 “ ‘We are happy to be able to state that …’: The Development of Discourse Presentation in The Times, 1833–1988”. Media History 20 (1): 67–87.
Leech, Geoffrey and Mick Short
2007 [1981]Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. (Second edition.) Harlow: Pearson.
Lutzky, Ursula
2015 “Quotations in Early Modern English Witness Depositions”. In Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds), The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, 343–367. Berlin: Mouton.
McHale, Brian
1978 “Free Indirect Discourse: A Survey of Recent Accounts”. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 31: 249–287.
2002 “Reporting Direct Speech in Early Modern Slander Depositions”. In Donka Minkova and Robert Stockwell (eds), Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective, 399–416. Berlin: Mouton.
2011Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myers, Greg
1999 “Unspoken Speech: Hypothetical Reported Discourse and the Rhetoric of Everyday Talk”. Text 19 (4): 571–590.
Philips, Susan U.
1986 “Reported Speech as Evidence in an American Trial”. In Deborah Tannen and James E. Alatis (eds), Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data and Application, 154–170. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Schuelke, Gertrude L.
1958 “ ‘Slipping’ in Indirect Discourse”. American Speech 33 (2): 90–98.
Semino, Elena
2004 “Representing Characters’ Speech and Thought in Narrative Fiction: A Study of England, England by Julian Barnes”. Style 38 (4): 428–451.
Semino, Elena and Mick Short
2004Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.
Semino, Elena, Mick Short and Martin Wynne
1999 “Hypothetical Words and Thoughts in Contemporary British Narratives”. Narrative 7 (3): 307–334.
Short, Mick, Elena Semino and Martin Wynne
2002 “Revisiting the Notion of Faithfulness in Discourse Presentation Using a Corpus Approach”. Language and Literature 11 (4): 325–355.
Slembrouck, Stef
1992 “The Parliamentary Hansard ‘Verbatim’ Report: The Written Construction of Spoken Discourse”. Language and Literature 1 (2): 101–119.
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Geoff
1996 “Voices in the Text: Discourse Perspectives on Language Reports”. Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–530.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive – Functional Approach. Berlin: Mouton.
Walker, Terry
2011 “Chapter 4: Legal Background”. In Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker, Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England, 101–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2007Pragmatic Aspects of Reported Speech: The Case of Early Modern English Courtroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Wooffitt, Robin
2007 “The Dead in the Service of the Living”. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 244–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2023. Disgusting, obscene and aggravating language: speech descriptors and the sociopragmatic evaluation of speech in theOld Bailey Corpus. English Language and Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 517 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.