Review published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.142151
Brownlees, Nicholas, Gabriella Del Lungo and John Denton
(eds) 2010The Language of Public and Private in a Historical Perspective. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Daybell, James
2012The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Susan M. Fitzmaurice
(eds) 2006Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas and Joanna Kopaczyk
(eds) 2013 Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
1985 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 361: 15–43.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko and Anita Auer
2014 “Letters of Artisans and the Labouring Poor (England, c. 1750–1835): Approaching Linguistic Diversity in Late Modern English”. In Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier (eds), Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English, 187–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Landert, Daniela
2013Personalisation in Mass Media Communication. British Online News between Public and Private. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martineau, France
2013 “Written Documents”. In Marijke J. van der Wal and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Touching the Past: Studies in the Historical Sociolinguistics of Ego-Documents, 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlund, Taru
2013 “Letter-Writing as a Communicative Practice – Polyphony in Finnish Emigrant Letters in the 19th Century”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics (special issue) 49 (3): 381–398.Google Scholar
Nurmi, Arja, Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin
(eds) 2009The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin
Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke J. van der Wal
Tamošiūnaitė, Aurelija
2013 “Lithuanian on both sides of the Atlantic: Toward the ‘intended’ standard”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics (special issue) 49 (3): 355–380.Google Scholar
Thaisen, Jacob
2014 “Initial Position in the Middle English Verse Line”. English Studies 95 (5): 500–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid M.
2014 In Search of Jane Austen: The Language of the Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosters, Rik, Mike Kestemont and Folgert Karsdorp
2015 “Open-set Authorship Verification and Language History from below: Determining Authorship in a Corpus of 18th-Century Correspondence”. Paper presented at the Data to Evidence Conference. 19–23 October. Helsinki.
Watts, Richard J.
2008 “Grammar Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain: A Community of Practice or a Discourse Community?” In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing, 37–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wood, Johanna L.
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2013 “1820 Settler Petitions in the Cape Colony: Genre Dynamics and Materiality”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14 (1): 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Włodarczyk, Matylda and Irma Taavitsainen
eds Forthcoming Historical (Socio)Pragmatics Journal of Historical Pragmatics special issue 18 2 DOI logo