Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.3468
References
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “I Think – An English Modal Particle”. In Toril Swan and Olaf J. Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi. S.
2001 “Commas and Canaries: The Role of Punctuation in Speech and Writing”. Language Sciences 23 (1): 15–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2006 “Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a “Compositional” Meaning”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 449–464. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H.
2006Political Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt
1998 “Between Brackets: (Some Properties of) Parenthetical Clauses in Latin. An Investigation of the Language of Cicero’s Letters”. In Rodie Risselada (ed.), Latin in Use: Amsterdam Studies in the Pragmatics of Latin, 1–17. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “The Development of I Mean: Implications for the Study of Historical Pragmatics”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 37–79. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Discourse Markers”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle
2008 “Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin: linéarisation, délimitation et insertion” [“Syntactic characteristics of parenthesis in Latin: linearization, delimitation and insertion”]. Discours (online) 31. Published 23 May 2009 and downloaded 10 October 2012. Available online at: [URL]
Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick
2010 “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 167–192. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conte, Gian Biagio
2003Dějiny římské literatury [‘History of Roman Literature’]. Translated by Daša Bartoňková, Petr Kyloušek, Jana Nechutová, Petra Psíková, Daniela Urbanová and Šárka Vilasová-Freddo. Praha: Koniasch Latin Press (KLP).Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2010 “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging”. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider (ed.), New Approaches to Hedging, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fugier, Huguette
1991 “Nominal Anaphora, Text, Argumentation (from Plautus to Cicero)”. In Robert Coleman (ed.), New Studies in Latin Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 4th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 382–399. Cambridge, UK. April 1987 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geymonat, Mario
2008 “Grafia e interpunzione nell’ antichità greca e latina, nella cultura bizantina e nella latinità medievale” [“Writing and punctuation in Greek and Latin Antiquity, Byzantine Culture and Medieval Latinity”]. In Bice Mortara Garavelli (ed.), Storia della punteggiatura in Europa [‘History of Punctuation in Europe’], 27–62. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014 “The Development of Discourse and Pragmatic Markers”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 10–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli
2015 “Attention Getters: Pragmatic Paths and Diachronic Developments from Latin to Italian”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 221: 21–47. Available online at: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2008Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
2013English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ker, Walter C. A.
1957Cicero Philippics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press and London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2015 “The Impact of Input and Output Domains: Towards a Function-based Categorization of Types of Grammaticalization”. Language Sciences 471: 172–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molinelli, Piera
2010 “From Verbs to Interactional Discourse Markers: The Pragmaticalization of Latin Rogo, Quaeso ”. In Gualtiero Calboli and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), Papers on Grammar XI1, 181–192. Roma: Herder. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Verb-based Functional Markers in Latin: Morphosyntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics at a Crossroads [on-line]”. (submission version). Available online at: [URL]
2014 “The Development of Functional Roles and Romance Languages: Processes and Patterns”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 261–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Cicli di pragmaticalizzazione tra latino e lingue romanze: la formazione di marcatori interazionali” [“Cycles of Pragmaticalization between Latin and Romance Languages: Formation of Interactional Markers”]. In Michèle Fruyt, Gerd V. Haverling and Rosanna Sornicola (eds), Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013) [‘Proceedings from the 27th International Conference on Linguistics and Romance Philology (Nancy, 15–20 July 2013)’]. Section 2: Linguistique latine/linguistique romane [‘Section 2: Latin Linguistics/Romance Linguistics’], 151–162. Nancy: ATILF. Available online at: [URL]
Parkes, M. B.
1992Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
2015The Oxford Latin Syntax. (Volume I: The Simple Clause .) Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risselada, Rodie
1989 “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals”. In Marius Lavency and Dominique Longrée (eds), Actes du cinquième Colloque de Linguistique Latine. Louvain-la-Neuve/ Borzée, 31 mars – 4 avril 1989 [‘Proceedings from the 5th Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Louvain-la-Neuve/ Borzée, 31 March – 4 April 1989’]. = Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 15 [‘Journal of The Department of Linguistics at Louvain’], 367–378. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange
1991 “The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress”. American Speech 66 (3): 227–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosén, Hannah
2009 “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-part Modification : The Contribution of Particles”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 317–442. (Volume 1: Syntax of the Sentence .) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2010Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
2007 “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taous, Tatiana
2017 “The Dico Form: An Autonymous Marker”. Journal of Latin Linguistics 16 (2): 219–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unceta Gómez, Luis
2009 “Elementos parentéticos en la organización discursiva de la oratoria de Cicerón” [‘Parenthetical elements in the discourse organization in Cicero’s oratory’]. In Trinidad Arcos Pereira, Jorge Fernández López and Francisca Moya del Baño (eds), Pectora mulcet. estudios de retórica y oratoria latinas [‘Pectora mulcet. Studies in Latin Rhetoric and Oratory’], 247–258. Logroño: Instituto de Estudios Riojanos.Google Scholar
2017 “Pragmaticalización y lenguas clásicas: el caso de latín abi ” [‘Pragmaticalization and Classical Languages: The Case of Latin Abi’ ]. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22 (1): 207–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Diane and Sylvie Dubois
1996 “A Study of the Use of Reported Speech in Spoken Language”. In Jennifer Arnold, Renee Blake and Brad Davidson (eds), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis. Selected Papers from NWAV 23 at Stanford, 361–374. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Yonge, Charles Duke
2014The Tusculan Disputations. (Online.) Last updated 17 December 2014. Accessed 8 February 2017 at: [URL]

Texts and dictionaries

Tombeur, P. et al.
2015Library of Latin Texts – Series A [database]. Centre Traditio Litterarum Occidentalium. Turnhout: Brepols. Available online at: [URL]. Thesaurus linguae Latinae 2004 [DVD-ROM: col.]. Third edition. Leipzig: K. G. Saur.