The subjunctive in Renaissance French
An exploratory study through personal correspondence
The aim of this study was to explore why the subjunctive, despite its lack of modal productivity, might persist in
French. I argue that the subjunctive is a modally void fossil, persisting due to repeated usage following highly entrenched
constructions. The focus here is on the behaviour of the subjunctive in Renaissance French, specifically in the sixteenth and
early-seventeenth centuries. Content analysis of personal correspondence identified the real subjunctive usage that lies beneath
the French polish applied by standardisation. Through analysis of the structures that trigger the subjunctive in complement clause
environments, I explore the grammatical behaviour of the subjunctive. The subjunctive was routinised after regularly occurring
verbal and non-verbal constructions, strengthening the subjunctive’s position in certain complement clause environments. This
study has diachronic importance in identifying which salient forms might persist in French. There are insights into the
behaviour – perhaps the foundations – of the subjunctive paradigm in French as it stands today.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The situation at hand
- 1.2Theoretical framework and background
- 1.3This study
- 2.Method
- 3.Results
- 3.1Overview of subjunctive-triggering constructions
- 3.1.1Jean Calvin
- 3.1.2Marguerite de Valois
- 3.1.3Catherine de Bourbon
- 3.1.4Michel de Montaigne
- 3.1.5Overall trigger distribution
- 3.2Cross-data similarities
- 3.2.1Non-verbal triggers
- 3.2.2Verbal triggers
- 3.3Other observations
- 3.3.1Present participle and gerund triggers
- 3.3.2Context dependency of the subjunctive in complement clauses
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Note
-
References